Imma run some calcs real quick just to see what happens. If we need to, we can lower the level or remove rollout or something, but I don't see a moody mon 6-0ing the trainer just by virtue of moody. I'm going to assume that the trainer has 6 level 12s by the time he hits the first TLS grunt.Too strong for this stage of the game. TLS is not only known for breaking rules, but also for using crappy unviable Pokemon. The player should get used to effortlessly beating the crap out of TLS grunts before having a fight with one that is an actual challenge.
Otherwise lots of good storyline stuff. I would like this idea if the bidoof didn't have Moody (and the grunt was wondering why his bidoof couldn't win).
0+ SpA level 12 Charmander ember vs. 0 HP / 0 SpD level 13 Bidoof: 9-12 (21.4 - 28.5%) -- 12.7% chance to 4HKO
0 Atk Bidoof level 13 Tackle vs. 0 HP / 0 Def level 12 Charmander: 10-13 (28.5 - 37.1%) -- 48.9% chance to 3HKO
Frick, they buffed tackle, but not the rest of the plethora of 40 BP moves out there? Gdi trollfreak, way to make starter pokemon flat out worse then regional rodents for the first 20-30 levels
0 Atk level 13 Bidoof Rollout(30 BP) vs. 0 HP / 0 Def level 5 Golett: 3-4 (13.6 - 18.1%) -- possible 6HKO
0 Atk level 13 Bidoof Rollout(60 BP) vs. 0 HP / 0 Def level 5 Golett: 7-8 (31.8 - 36.3%) -- 75.6% chance to 3HKO
0 Atk level 13 Bidoof Rollout(120 BP) vs. 0 HP / 0 Def level 5 Golett: 13-16 (59 - 72.7%) -- guaranteed 2HKO
Well, at least golette can buy a couple of turns
Hmmm, lemme try lowering the level a bit, I forgot about the tackle buff actually makes STAB tackle the best move out there at this point.
0+ SpA level 12 Charmander ember vs. 0 HP / 0 SpD level 10 Bidoof: 10-13 (29.4 - 38.2%) -- 84.4% chance to 3HKO
0 Atk level 10 Bidoof Tackle vs. 0 HP / 0 Def level 12 Charmander: 7-10 (20 - 28.5%) -- 81.1% chance to 4HKO
0+ SpA level 12 Charmander ember vs. +2 0 HP / 0 SpD level 10 Bidoof: 6-7 (17.6 - 20.5%) -- possible 5HKO
+2 0 Atk level 10 Bidoof Tackle vs. 0 HP / 0 Def level 12 Charmander: 15-18 (42.8 - 51.4%) -- 0.4% chance to 2HKO
Ok, at least now it takes 2 moody boosts in attack before bidoof starts 2 shotting everyone. I think level 10 would be better.
0 Atk Bidoof level 13 Tackle vs. 0 HP / 0 Def level 12 Charmander: 10-13 (28.5 - 37.1%) -- 48.9% chance to 3HKO
Frick, they buffed tackle, but not the rest of the plethora of 40 BP moves out there? Gdi trollfreak, way to make starter pokemon flat out worse then regional rodents for the first 20-30 levels
0 Atk level 13 Bidoof Rollout(30 BP) vs. 0 HP / 0 Def level 5 Golett: 3-4 (13.6 - 18.1%) -- possible 6HKO
0 Atk level 13 Bidoof Rollout(60 BP) vs. 0 HP / 0 Def level 5 Golett: 7-8 (31.8 - 36.3%) -- 75.6% chance to 3HKO
0 Atk level 13 Bidoof Rollout(120 BP) vs. 0 HP / 0 Def level 5 Golett: 13-16 (59 - 72.7%) -- guaranteed 2HKO
Well, at least golette can buy a couple of turns
Hmmm, lemme try lowering the level a bit, I forgot about the tackle buff actually makes STAB tackle the best move out there at this point.
0+ SpA level 12 Charmander ember vs. 0 HP / 0 SpD level 10 Bidoof: 10-13 (29.4 - 38.2%) -- 84.4% chance to 3HKO
0 Atk level 10 Bidoof Tackle vs. 0 HP / 0 Def level 12 Charmander: 7-10 (20 - 28.5%) -- 81.1% chance to 4HKO
0+ SpA level 12 Charmander ember vs. +2 0 HP / 0 SpD level 10 Bidoof: 6-7 (17.6 - 20.5%) -- possible 5HKO
+2 0 Atk level 10 Bidoof Tackle vs. 0 HP / 0 Def level 12 Charmander: 15-18 (42.8 - 51.4%) -- 0.4% chance to 2HKO
Ok, at least now it takes 2 moody boosts in attack before bidoof starts 2 shotting everyone. I think level 10 would be better.
Well, good news is that the player can lead with a mon with toxic (please tell me we're introducing TM toxic in either route two or very shortly into the forest) or lead slowpoke with yawn and then just wail on him while he's helpless. I think the purpose of TLS is to show why we ban this kind of stuff, because it forces you into running stupid crap just to beat it.