Yeah really. What really bugged me the most is how you treat every lucky turn for him as gamebreaking for you like how Overheat crited on Arbok completely ignoring that a -2 Thunderbolt from a defensive Rotom (At least thats what I think it was) probably won't do much to Arbok. And it seemed extremely hypocritical how you ignored how game breaking all those lucky poisons were for your opponent.You complained about the guy's Special Defense downs, but then you fail to see that you got a turn 1 shed skin like 3 times, as well as getting Poison Fang's bad poison every time you used it...
All in all I'd say you haxed him more than he haxed you.
The (BAN ME PLEASE) was the Machamp, not Urban Legend. Don't be so poke-loving because that machamp was just annoying as hell to me, my fault but still annoying. I guess many people felt like that when Garchomp was OU and it sweep'd unprepared teams; "fucking Garchomp of hell!" or so... I can imagine it.Your not supposed to mock your opponent.
K, I will have that in count ^^Or at least replace some of the "fucks" with "shit". Heh. That'll help.
I don't think anyone need to grow up because they find excessive swearing not amusing.OH MY GOD HE SWORE EXECUTE HIM NOW
not that i am saying this was a good warstory, the comments were atrocious, but the swearing wasnt the worst bit, or even bad at all. grow up.
Then I would suggest replacing Poison Fang with Toxic.Thank you, thank you very much.
Great warstory. The swearing actually didn't bother me too much. And the fact that you used Arbok to great effect, of course, makes this automatic win. I tell you, I'm going to raise an Arbok like yours. Actually, my shiny Arbok has Shed Skin, I'll have to check the nature.... Please have a Careful nature....
...Oh, wait, Poison Fang's an egg move.
Oh, I can breed Poison Fang onto an Ekans easy. This just means that I'd have to use Toxic if I were to do up my shiny Arbok this way. I didn't check, but I don't think it has a careful nature anyway.Then I would suggest replacing Poison Fang with Toxic.
Not defending the commentary or anything, but he just said, like 5 posts up, that he was hating on the Machamp, not on its player, when he used the word "(BAN ME PLEASE)." In a way, he was actually complimenting his opponent for building/using a Pokemon in such a way that it was able to frustrate his gameplan so much. I would actually be gratified to hear that an opponent had responded to one of my Pokemon in this way.Nice warstory, had a cool niche with a unique pokémon and decent commentary. I think people are really overreacting to the whole swearing bit, but what I don't approve of is calling your opponent a (BAN ME PLEASE).