Justifying the decision with the excuse that giving a rematch could be abused by a player to hack himself or give his password to a friend is completely nonsensical, since it ignores the precedent of handing an instant loss to whoever gets hacked and how it would be even worse.
Basically, by setting this precedent you are allowing any banned user with the required knowledge to control SPL by simply hacking whoever they want to lose, while having no way to punish it at all (what are you going to do? Double permaban them?)
On the other hand, allowing for a rematch would only allow for the previously mentioned method, in where if found out the player would be severely punished and thus creates a reason NOT to do it which is lacking on the other possibillity. And if detecting said cheating method would be a concern, i'd like to point out how since we do not have to post videos playing our games, ghosting via discord PMs is basically undetectable aside from a confession, and yet i don't see anybody clamoring for a way to detect it, so that is clearly not an issue.
Making a decision without leaving a precedent is probably the best choice seeing the flaws of the other ones, but if this case doesn't amerit a rematch i seriously don't know what does.
Basically, by setting this precedent you are allowing any banned user with the required knowledge to control SPL by simply hacking whoever they want to lose, while having no way to punish it at all (what are you going to do? Double permaban them?)
On the other hand, allowing for a rematch would only allow for the previously mentioned method, in where if found out the player would be severely punished and thus creates a reason NOT to do it which is lacking on the other possibillity. And if detecting said cheating method would be a concern, i'd like to point out how since we do not have to post videos playing our games, ghosting via discord PMs is basically undetectable aside from a confession, and yet i don't see anybody clamoring for a way to detect it, so that is clearly not an issue.
Making a decision without leaving a precedent is probably the best choice seeing the flaws of the other ones, but if this case doesn't amerit a rematch i seriously don't know what does.