Serious The Politics Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
as a non american

why did they pick up consultants of a widely disliked figure that lost against trump?
Because politics is a lucrative industry and both parties are beholden to big donors. Follow the money. Donors call the shots. The consultant class has to justify their existence which means placating the donors.

And yes, I’ll go back to saying fuck all the big donors that stabbed Biden in the back. Fuck their consultants too. The old man is still to this day the only one that handed Trump a political ass kicking. If he was that weak, you shoulda funded a primary challenge. Cowards.
 
You still have not answered the question. Do you like Baku's new PFP or not?earn to follow the rules.
it looks fine

You're right, it's unfair for me to ask you to solve all of our problems. However I believe that goes for you as well. Socialists do not argue that Socialism (or a centrally planned economy?) will solve all of our problems. One common definition of Socialism is that of a transitory state moving away from a Capitalist system to a different system, usually some form of Communism, under the idea that we need to prioritize our collective needs (food, water, shelter, stability, etc.) before anything else.
what u basically described here is socialists wanting to go towards a centrally planned economy, do u know why? if u saw the countless replies to me talking about imperialism, the reason why so many people here brought this up as a counter is cause markets are inherently profit driven systems, which gives bigger countries the incentive to invade smaller ones and exploit them. In a socialist's head, this alternative system that stops imperialism is a centrally planned economy, which in theory stops this profit driven system that is the cause of modern day imperialism (at least in their head)

any honest socialist can agree with this. this new system is essentially the core belief of ur entire world view. u either dont know enough about ur own system (within my expectation), or ur not the person im talking to

I'm curious, even if you dislike Socialism (or centrally planned economies??), do you disagree with that sentiment? Should we not prioritize our collective needs first?t learn to follow the rules.
im a huge believer in social safety nets, and helping the ones in need. i dont disagree with the sentiment, hence why i support a lot of socialist ideas. my problem is always with the method to get the resources to help those people. Just cause they are delusional and want to overthrow an already fairly working system that the entire world has basically adopted because it just works better than everything else, it does not mean people who don't agree with their measures to implement those ideas cant sympathize with their sentiments.

this moral high ground simply because they are delusional enough to believe in fairy tale theories is pretty annoying, especially when they keep mentioning poverty, starvation and etc, as if our current system has not been a demonstrable change for the better of the entire world, unlike a centrally planned economy

Socialism is a relativistic, highly contextual umbrella term that can refer to a lot of things. Is your problem with Socialism or centrally planned economies? There are instances within our current system that you could say are, or at least resemble, centrally planned economies. Supermarkets are one commonly cited example. What is your take on this? Do you feel that these systems are doomed to collapse? Are they simply unable to operate on larger scales? If so, then how much do you think such a system would be able to expand before it collapses? What would bring about the collapse?learn to follow the rules.
yes, my problem lies with a centrally planned economy. I dont have too much of a concern with other types of variation (which is maybe 1% out of the 99%)

There are instances where there is a small resemblance of a centrally planned economy theory present in social programs. For example, health care in canada or some parts of EU. But those are tax funded social institutions, to call these anything close to a centrally planned economy besides the fact that the prices are controlled and etc is just ridiculous. Supermarkets are probably the furthest things away from a centrally planned economy. its probably the single best representation of how effective markets can be with supply and demand, it goes against ur point here.

given that ur talking about these "centrally planned economies" existence in our current system, im gonna replace ur supermarkets example cause its wrong and replace it with health care cause its more appropriate. These system can continue to function, at however large scale as the funding it gets provides. The problem here is that all these stuff HEAVILY rely on markets, that produce the most value with the best efficacy that gets in the most tax money for these stuff to function. for a socialist, they want to get rid of this system for a no profit driven one (centrally planned economy)
If your problem is with Socialism, could you please be more specific about what you mean when you refer to Socialism?

Also, I would like to see your work when you mention that Socialism and/or centrally planned economies have been "wildly disproven". Could you please elaborate on that some more?

1. basically every person advocating for the abolition of our current profit driven system for something like a centrally planned one.(go back to my first paragraph in this post and remember that is like the vast vast majority of socialists, especially the ones who mention imperialism as a counter argument against capitalism, in support for socialism, its the logical conclusion unless they have 0 idea about their own system they are preaching for which is within my expectation lol)

2. not sure what u mean by "my work". do u want me to link like 1000 research papers on this, or ur looking to see where exactly I got the my ideas from on socialism. i watch an solid amount of debates on a lot of topics that has to do with the economy, socialism vs capitalism being one, i used to be way more invested in this topic years ago and i would learn a lot about some core ideas behind this centrally planned shit so I would have an easier time understanding it when i talk about it(to see if its even worth to try it out in this modern age). been a while since i bothered to think about this tho

Or at least learn to follow the rules.
i call this a violent revolution, comrade.
 
Last edited:
as a non american

why did they pick up consultants of a widely disliked figure that lost against trump?
Clinton, Biden, and Harris are all products of the same political establishment, and they all have the same fundamental priorities. A lot of the same people are behind all three campaigns. Biden did the same shit that Harris is doing right now: After running on a platform of defeating Trump at all costs because of imminent danger to American liberal democracy, he quickly started talking the same talk about reaching across the isle, bipartisan compromise, and so on. It's what these people do.
 
Clinton, Biden, and Harris are all products of the same political establishment, and they all have the same fundamental priorities. A lot of the same people are behind all three campaigns. Biden did the same shit that Harris is doing right now: After running on a platform of defeating Trump at all costs because of imminent danger to American liberal democracy, he quickly started talking the same talk about reaching across the isle, bipartisan compromise, and so on. It's what these people do.
Yep. It’s important to point out that Clinton being a progressive policy wonk, Biden being adamantly pro-worker, Obama being hopelessly optimistic, and Harris / Walz being astute and sassy really are who they are. The donors create this shift. Can’t piss off their Republican golf buddies!
 
Yep. It’s important to point out that Clinton being a progressive policy wonk, Biden being adamantly pro-worker, Obama being hopelessly optimistic, and Harris / Walz being astute and sassy really are who they are. The donors create this shift. Can’t piss off their Republican golf buddies!
I don't think this is right either. Even in the case of dems who had more left leaning pasts, being influenced by donors and participating in the war machine is still a choice theyve decided to pursue. Also biden was a segregationist, that bozo has been a conservative chud since the day he stepped inside political chambers
 
I don't think this is right either. Even in the case of dems who had more left leaning pasts, being influenced by donors and participating in the war machine is still a choice theyve decided to pursue. Also biden was a segregationist, that bozo has been a conservative chud since the day he stepped inside political chambers
Nope, this is completely wrong and bordering on disinformation. It is not choice. You think Biden wanted to drop out?

You do what the donors say or your campaign becomes broke. That means all those staffers you hired and campaign offices lose their jobs. Down ballot candidates are the first to abandon ship as they need to most financial help from the party-donor apparatus. No money = no operation.
 
Gents, I don’t know quite how to say it - but you did watch the debate between Biden and Trump, right?

It is pretty obvious to the rest of the world that Biden was going to lose this election badly. Trump hasn’t got to his level of senility, and though he’s an - absolutely terrible - human being, politician, liar, etc etc - he was still going to be beat Biden.

I have to say though, I think Harris is about to lose badly, as Hilary Clinton did, regardless. She could have gone a different direction, right now it looks like she is too ideologically invested in Israel to understand that only some firm changes to her policy - that ultimately wouldn’t hurt Israel’s security, it would improve it - and the improve the plight of the Palestinians - she could have won this easily.

I’m predicting a Trump whitewash.
 
Nope, this is completely wrong and bordering on disinformation. It is not choice. You think Biden wanted to drop out?

You do what the donors say or your campaign becomes broke. That means all those staffers you hired and campaign offices lose their jobs. Down ballot candidates are the first to abandon ship as they need to most financial help from the party-donor apparatus. No money = no operation.

I'm saying that for you to still play by the rules of american politics means any leftist morals you had were weak and easy to bend in reality. None of these candidates were idiots, they knew about the american war machine and still played alongside it for political power. If you play by donor money, you are as bad as the donors, even if that's the only way to play the game.
 
I wonder why American politics are so hopelessly fucked. :tymp:
Well, people decided to sit out or protest vote 2016, guaranteeing a conservative Supreme Court supermajority for a generation. Knowing Clinton was running on campaign finance reform. But at least the Democrats were taught a lesson!

I'm saying that for you to still play by the rules of american politics means any leftist morals you had were weak and easy to bend in reality. None of these candidates were idiots, they knew about the american war machine and still played alongside it for political power. If you play by donor money, you are as bad as the donors, even if that's the only way to play the game.
If you are implying that Obama, Clinton, Biden, and Harris are deriving benefits beyond book deals and lucrative speaking engagements, do provide specifics. You seem to know much about their personal morals.
 
If you are implying that Obama, Clinton, Biden, and Harris are deriving benefits beyond book deals and lucrative speaking engagements, do provide specifics. You seem to know much about their personal morals.

the job of US president is one of the most powerful ones in the world. Anything that benefits the us hegemony will benefit them. Their personal morals mean nothing to me, frankly, because what matters is how they drive the us war machine, and not a single one has done anything that makes inclined to believe they have good intentions or true strong politics beyond the US status quo. They are not people, they're tools and they do a pretty good job for that
 
So a new book from acclaimed author Ta-Nehisi Coates called “The Message” is out. He went on CBS Mornings to discuss it and was interviewed by a few American journalists. Here is the interview right here:


Since that interview over a week ago, there’s been an astonishing (to me anyway) complete reframing of that interview and the book being talked about by some sections of America’s media. Such as this recounted in the interview below:


IMG_1633.jpeg


IMG_1634.jpeg


Like what the hell is this other than a blatantly racist commentary by Helen Andrews? She either didn’t read the book, or felt it her job to defend Israel at all costs by accusing him of being anti-Israel?

Also, historical point here, “Jews carved Israel out of the desert”.

What is this nonsense? Palestine, 1945, Bethlehem.

1728854992864.jpeg


Source: https://www.palestineremembered.com/GeoPoints/Nativity_Church_4633/Picture_15542.html

How many racist tropes could you fit into a few lines of so called authorial critique?

Also - Wakanda is a fictional place. Another racist trope.

Americans in this thread - are you not frightened by this blatant racism against a black author on television, going completely unchallenged?

This is lunacy - putting humankind back centuries at this rate.
 
So a new book from acclaimed author Ta-Nehisi Coates called “The Message” is out. He went on CBS Mornings to discuss it and was interviewed by a few American journalists. Here is the interview right here:


Since that interview over a week ago, there’s been an astonishing (to me anyway) complete reframing of that interview and the book being talked about by some sections of America’s media. Such as this recounted in the interview below:


View attachment 678185

View attachment 678186

Like what the hell is this other than a blatantly racist commentary by Helen Andrews? She either didn’t read the book, or felt it her job to defend Israel at all costs by accusing him of being anti-Israel?

Also, historical point here, “Jews carved Israel out of the desert”.

What is this nonsense? Palestine, 1945, Bethlehem.

View attachment 678189

Source: https://www.palestineremembered.com/GeoPoints/Nativity_Church_4633/Picture_15542.html

How many racist tropes could you fit into a few lines of so called authorial critique?

Also - Wakanda is a fictional place. Another racist trope.

Americans in this thread - are you not frightened by this blatant racism against a black author on television, going completely unchallenged?

This is lunacy - putting humankind back centuries at this rate.
Likening Israel to Wakanda is farcical. I'd be mortified at this rhetoric if it wasn't so completely laughable.
 
Also, historical point here, “Jews carved Israel out of the desert”.

The israeli settler project uses similar wording to the genocide of australia: terra nulis, a place where no one lives and thus is free for taking. Of course, people do live there, so for the rhetoric to work, you must dehumanize the current population into a category of non-humans, so that real humans may take charge of it, and then exterminate them. It uses the same steps of most genocide escalation, but tends to escalate much faster, as we've seen with israel.

It's also why israel cant stop killing. The entire settlement requires palestinians to be seen as inhuman, and any stops will allow the world to pause and have a chance to humanize them again. Its why most israelis, despite whatever news you see of "disliking the Netanahyu" government, are pretty happy with the bombings and wish for faster escalation and cleansing. They are just as guilty as their government, as most settlers are
 
I'm not gonna read a reflexive defense of Israel but just to be sure, you are aware that the overwhelming majority of Coates' literary output over the past decade is literally Black Panther and other superhero comics, right? Like it's not just some completely contextless racist dogwhistle
 
So a new book from acclaimed author Ta-Nehisi Coates called “The Message” is out. He went on CBS Mornings to discuss it and was interviewed by a few American journalists. Here is the interview right here:


Since that interview over a week ago, there’s been an astonishing (to me anyway) complete reframing of that interview and the book being talked about by some sections of America’s media. Such as this recounted in the interview below:


View attachment 678185

View attachment 678186

Like what the hell is this other than a blatantly racist commentary by Helen Andrews? She either didn’t read the book, or felt it her job to defend Israel at all costs by accusing him of being anti-Israel?

Also, historical point here, “Jews carved Israel out of the desert”.

What is this nonsense? Palestine, 1945, Bethlehem.

View attachment 678189

Source: https://www.palestineremembered.com/GeoPoints/Nativity_Church_4633/Picture_15542.html

How many racist tropes could you fit into a few lines of so called authorial critique?

Also - Wakanda is a fictional place. Another racist trope.

Americans in this thread - are you not frightened by this blatant racism against a black author on television, going completely unchallenged?

This is lunacy - putting humankind back centuries at this rate.

horrifying but not rly surprising ~ internally within the so called us, black people are very often the primary targets of philosemitic accusations of antisemitism. the whole function and operation of philosemitic ideology is to use "protecting the jews" as a trojan horse for colonial violence, and in this white supremacist settler colony that means anti-black violence.
sometimes black ppl dont even have to be antizionists to be subjected to such attacks, but ofc the attacks are more intensified toward black people (and organizations) who speak in support of palestinian liberation; for example throughout ~2016-2020 or so, white supremacist philosemitism organizations such as the ADL regularly carried out smear campaigns directed at 'black lives matter' organizations and members that for example may have spoken out against the many police departments that receive training from the IDF/IOF on how to 'be more effective' ie on strategic and tactical operations as a militarized occupation force in black communities. many 'blm' organizations and activists were placed on lists of extremists, to be targetted for surveillance. (to be clear this is not that new, we now know the ADL aggressively infiltrated and surveilled and informed on individuals and groups organizing in solidarity against apartheid south africa in the 80s as well as black liberation and other "civil rights" movements in the 60s-70s.
https://droptheadl.org)

anti-black philosemitic violence isnt even limited to "the left" tho, eg the attacks on whoopi goldberg from the center-right show "the view" a year or two ago played out similar tropes. she essentially put forward propaganda that philosemitism itself is responsible for, erasing that nazism was a cohesive white nationalist ideology that targetted not only jews but roma and black people and broadly everyone who it excluded from whiteness, and instead saying that the sho'ah "wasnt about race" [meaning race as it is defined in a current "us" context, not recognizing that racialization varies (somewhat) across different places and times] obv this is wrong but since critcizing this position in a substantive way would expose the contradictions of philosemitism, instead she is j accused of "being antisemitic", and forced to say that she needs to "Educate herself on antisemitism" and apologize to the ADL (an organization directly responsible for the miseducation of her and so many others in this area, which is not rly a issue of her being antisemitic, these comments have nothing to do with hatred or prejudice of jewish people, rather they reflect a lack of understanding of the long history of white supremacy, and nazism as a 'culmination' of that history.)
furthermore this forced apology is intended to propagandize the idea/myth that all black people "naturally" have anti-semitic tendencies and need to prioritize "educating themselves on antisemitism", as well as the threat/message of how any black person who does not do so will be treated in media discourse.
in general, basically any instance of alleged "Black antisemitism" is spotlighted and blown up in the media, i mean this was being talked about everywhere for weeks and weeks, if u criticized all the nonsense that u encounter in daytime talk shows youd never talk about anything else.

across these various situations, the media is pushing forward philosemitism, and in particular the presumption that black people are 'antisemitic until proven otherwise' (with "proof" meaning accepting the philosemitic redefinition of antisemitism). this serves to justify not only the palestinian genocide but also white supremacist settler violence within us borders.

"Under the philosemitic redefinition and wielding of antisemitism, Jews don’t exist as real people who are harmed but as abstractions with which state policy decisions can be justified or rejected. A state may increase its police presence in a certain area to “protect Jews” or it can reject policies, such as bail reform, claiming they “endanger the Jews....
"Over the past few years, there has been a massive spike in google searches for “Black antisemitism.” This spike in searches is greatest in New York, where there have been some attacks against Jewish people, some of which have been by non-Jewish Black people. Politicians, leaders in major Jewish organizations, and zionist activist groups began to demand major changes to protect the Jewish community against the threat that Black people allegedly pose. In the Tablet, one article by Liel Leibovitz claimed that a recent bail reform poses a threat to the Jews. Leibovitz writes “letting violent, hate-filled bigots walk free to commit more violent hate crimes as a matter of public policy is the definition of insanity. It’s evil. In practice, it seems, criminal justice reform and condemning police occupation are euphemisms for sacrificing the safety of real, live Jews on the altar of progressive claptrap.”
Over a dozen zionist organizations held a rally at the NYC City Hall which they called “Name it to Fight It! It’s Antisemitism! At this rally, Dov Hikind exclaimed that the work of fighting antisemitism “is on all of us — the Jewish community, as well as the non-Jewish minority communities where these attackers are coming from.” Mort Klein, the founder of the Zionist Organization of America, took his moment at the podium to assert “now is the time for African-American and Hispanic leaders to speak out against the brutal and regular and mindless attacks on innocent Jews” in New York. Most succinctly, Mort Klein demanded that the mayor not criticize the police and said that “compassion should be reserved for the innocent law-abiding victims, not the violent criminals.” Philosemitism asserts that Black people, who are antisemites until they prove otherwise, do not deserve compassion but instead must be policed. One potential solution, according to Mort Klein, was that the NYPD dress up as Orthodox Jews and patrol communities where Jews live to catch the Black people who allegedly endanger them. Whether or not Mort Klein sincerely believes this would be a good idea, I could think of no better way to increase actual hatred of Jews. Deneed Borelli said “most of the violent incidents against Jews in New York City are by Black men,” however this is literally a lie. In fact, white people commit antisemitic hate crimes in NYC at twice the rate Black people commit them. You might think that this can be explained by the fact that white people are a larger proportion of the NYC population. However, the number of hate crimes committed by white people in NYC is almost 25% higher than the proportion of white people in NYC’s population. Yet, there are no calls against “white antisemitism.” This is the philosemites justifying their colonial goals of increased policing of Black people in NYC ostensibly to “protect the Jews.” This is philosemitism."
(https://emcohen.medium.com/on-the-dangers-of-fighting-antisemitism-c888c0bbd79f)
 
I'm not gonna read a reflexive defense of Israel but just to be sure, you are aware that the overwhelming majority of Coates' literary output over the past decade is literally Black Panther and other superhero comics, right? Like it's not just some completely contextless racist dogwhistle
You are aware that what you’ve just written is inaccurate, surely?

A simple google search shows all of his other range of publications outnumbers and outweighs the success he had on the comics.

He has published poetry, papers, books giving treatise on a variety of subjects alongside various serious fictions he has written.

What you’ve written is basically a racist dog whistle in itself - as if the comics themselves are worth nothing and somehow invalidate any other output he has had?

I wonder, if he had been a white american writer, would you have criticised him in this way or undermined him in the way you are seeking to do so?

And yes, the interview WAS a racist dogwhistle. The transcript of the interview is appalling:

For all of Coates’ honors as a writer, Dokoupil said that the essay “would not be out of place in the backpack of an extremist.” He wondered why Coates’ writing did not include references to Israel being surrounded by enemies that want to eliminate the country.

“Is it because you just don’t believe that Israel in any condition has a right to exist?” he asked.

Coates said there was no shortage of places where Israel’s viewpoint is represented, and that he wanted to speak for those who don’t have a voice.

“I wrote a 260-page book,” Coates said. “It is not a treatise on the entirety of the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians.”

https://www.boston.com/news/media/2...ny-dokoupil-ta-nehisi-coates-interview-video/

Let’s be serious here please?

Dokoupil is divorced from an Israeli woman and has two children with her.

His questions were based on the Israeli narrative that there is no apartheid there and that all of its citizens have equal rights (which every, and I really do mean every, human rights group fundamentally disagrees with).

Dokoupil received a rebuke because he asked questions that were based on flawed premises, and were one sided in their meaning, giving the Palestinians no actual legitimacy.

The interview is hideous on so many different levels. A refusal to accept criticisms of Israel - check, racist dogwhistles on a black author - check, backlash against CBS for actually doing the right thing and citing editorial standards - check.

By all accounts and from watching the interview and reading the transcript, if you can’t conclude Dokoupil was racist in his questioning on a variety of levels, then I can’t help you.
 
Last edited:
Well, people decided to sit out or protest vote 2016, guaranteeing a conservative Supreme Court supermajority for a generation. Knowing Clinton was running on campaign finance reform. But at least the Democrats were taught a lesson!

Except that Bernie voters turned out and voted for Hillary at a higher percentage than Hillary voters did for Obama. wtf man, this talking point is ages debunked.
 
Also Farkin saying that Socialists address none of their arguments when they say "worker elected management would just be more incompetent" with zero proof.

Let's think through this for a second--

Which Board of Directors is likely to hire a more competent C-Suite Executive Team for Google, aiming at Google's long-term success?
-Board of Directors hired by Wallstreet Bankers
-Board of Directors hired by a system of Townhall Meetings & Elections lead by teams of Google Engineers, Finance, Sales, HR, Governance, and other key Professionals that Google workers themselves have tasked to research and lead that system

Saying, "it's capitalism by a different name," that's wrong-- because Socialism is defined again, by "WHO these systems work for, WHO has power."

If the criticism is that a worker-managed corporation will still be incentivized to do many bad things, and exploit the global south, sure that's true-- but now you're making a "leftier than though" criticism. Capitalism isn't great but we're not going back to Slavery, or Imperial Corporate Colonialism, or Feudalism. Socialism doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to be better than Capitalism.

And if you are making those arguments regardless, welcome to being a fringe leftist I guess-- that's the same criticism Bakugames would make. But as Divine has pointed out, these are not the same problem, and the world is a complex place of many humanitarian problems, not all can be fixed just by saying "well we have socialism now". Socialism can be a part of a solution for a broader human egalitarianism, and solving for the history of colonialism-- but I don't think it's useful or meaningful to say "you have to solve everything in the world or else it's not socialism." Especially if it's liberals telling socialists that that's the new bar to reach or trying to define what socialism is-- that's waaayyy too rich.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile Israel is fire bombing tents in a refugee camp - again.

Oh, and the North of Gaza has had no humanitarian aid, no fuel supplies no medical evacuations for a week.

Every day, a new atrocity, every day a new low, every day a new norm for Israel/Palestine.

How much longer can the world watch this and do nothing?


Also, great summing up from an American doctor who has been on the ground in Gaza.
 
Last edited:
Jill Stein is an irrelevant person who absolutely is not going to get anything more than a few thousand votes at most nationwide. The fact that Kamala's campaign could even consider her worth enough time to commit an ad for shows complete misunderstanding that when Leftists get annoyed with her, it isn't leading them to vote for other people, it's creating voter apathy and making people not want to vote at all.

This is why I always say that the way Kamala wins is by being hype and making people want to vote in general. Gen Z is now mostly at voting age and Gen Z is more progressive (as usual with most new generations), and it's been proven like several elections in a row that Gen Z is a voting block you can absolutely get to the booth. If you make them want to. Increase the number of voters in the election, not try to court voters from Trump.

I personally know people who got hyped to vote in 2020 because Biden promised college debt relief, and did in fact vote.
 
Jill Stein is an irrelevant person who absolutely is not going to get anything more than a few thousand votes at most nationwide. The fact that Kamala's campaign could even consider her worth enough time to commit an ad for shows complete misunderstanding that when Leftists get annoyed with her, it isn't leading them to vote for other people, it's creating voter apathy and making people not want to vote at all.

This is why I always say that the way Kamala wins is by being hype and making people want to vote in general. Gen Z is now mostly at voting age and Gen Z is more progressive (as usual with most new generations), and it's been proven like several elections in a row that Gen Z is a voting block you can absolutely get to the booth. If you make them want to. Increase the number of voters in the election, not try to court voters from Trump.

I personally know people who got hyped to vote in 2020 because Biden promised college debt relief, and did in fact vote.
Only issue is that no one in the thread is arguing that the strategy is good— even the liberals in the thread are silent or mostly also calling Kamala’s strategy terrible from a partisan or even progressive perspective.

Kamala has unified the party (against her post DNC campaigning lol/cry)
 
I saw an anti trump sesame street ad.

It wasn't directly calling him out, but it basically was saying the vote count is trustworthy.

Based sesame street.

Anyways, every day the Republican political ads get worse. There was one that said you shouldn't vote for a candidate because they support peaceful protests, and there are so many ones that are explicitly transphobic, like not just thinly veiled, but like directly calling trans women not just biological men, but men period. But then, there is this one, that takes the cake.
RSLC ads target Dems in 3 Assembly races – WisPolitics

This is an ad that says that this candidate is deciding where your children go to school, citing... him saying that he will just defund private schools.
I've also seen many ads saying that he said that political opponents should be executed, showing tweets that are entirely blurred out except for "deserves a traitor's fate" or "deserves worse than prison". I could not find the tweets in question, but I am fairly certain that they are taking this incredibly out of context.

There really needs to be a law making sure political ads don't just straight up lie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top