i'm very sorry why is voting skipper relevant here?The other part is AP was also mega towny to literally everyone in the game + he was voting skipper
building adjacent wagons
prob town, i dunno (gth towny), i dunno (I think there’s max 1 scum in these 3 ppl u mentioned and my first pick is realiti)
this is the lowest confidence ive had in a game in ages
i'm very sorry why is voting skipper relevant here?
i'm sorry, i'm not trying to be densethats more like what he did before he died (his reads), the other part was nobody scumread him (take that as what you will)
i'm sorry, i'm not trying to be dense
i quoted AP's readslist cos he got shot
you said that AP was mega towny (so maybe he wasnt shot for reads) and he was voting skipper
i cannot figure out why you mentioned that he was voting skipper, and this quote doesn't make sense to me, could you reword?
"you will learn if your target is vanilla or not, or at least whether you believe they are." so this returns a role, not an alignment, correct?Town Bunyip
why are you telling me to ignore that? as far as i can tell the only scumreads he had were skipper and pulsar (now ehmcee)where his vote was by eod is relevant to his legacy, u don’t have to think it’s relevant to why he died (i don’t think it’s relevant either)
why are you telling me to ignore that? as far as i can tell the only scumreads he had were skipper and pulsar (now ehmcee)
gotcha makes sense. i thought you were telling me to take his readslist with a grain of salt because he was universally townread. so i thought you adding the note about skipper was in service to that point.when i responded to ur quote of the post, it wasn’t a discount to anything, it was just adding information beyond that post
more generally and strategically, i don't get the sense that anyone is really happy with their understanding of the game, m2h is scumreading realiti and you at least doesn't sound like you've sorted him, why are we sat here voting nothingburger slots like flanders and ehmcee?
when you say "if i'm wrong on realiti/tommy/etc without being fully confident it's a hit it's just bad" as an explanation for why you're voting nulls on day 3, can you help me understand why your initial reaction to seeing my sub in was in fact to just vote realiti?honestly i got tilted a bit after eod1 and i still havent read back through d1, i honestly dk if i will both cos of laziness/dunno if ill actively gleam anything new
both slots were dropping to me and seemed like they can be weaklink hits + different wagons that can build to shake the day a bit
Rather than "yea if im wrong on realiti/tommy/etc without being fully confident it's a hit it's just bad"
##Vote realiti i guess
the read was dropping since eod71-72 confuses me:
you voted flanders
jalmont asked why we're voting people who haven't posted in a week
you said you're trying to build wagons
you then said you want dbd/flander wagon by EOD (noticeably ehmcee is not included)
jalmont then just votes for flander...and then follows that up with two posts that feel like they continue to doubt the usefulness of a flanders wagon
why did you say flanders was dropping throughout the day when he hasn't posted for a week
why did jalmont just vote flanders lmao
when you say "if i'm wrong on realiti/tommy/etc without being fully confident it's a hit it's just bad" as an explanation for why you're voting nulls on day 3, can you help me understand why your initial reaction to seeing my sub in was in fact to just vote realiti?