Metagame SV OU Metagame Discussion v4

ice beam and freeze-dry deal consistent damage regardless of their secondary effect. meanwhile with OHKO moves you either hit them or you don't. quite a big difference
 
was about to build a Kommo-o team (probably my 100th one) when i noticed that its sets were updated, i knew special clangorous was a thing, but when did physical clangorous soul pop off?
Screenshot 2024-11-25 002852.png
 
There are very limited clauses in the game, and all of them are no brainers.
Species Clause: Something that is already in the in game, and even still some people have argued about removing it.
OHKO Clause: Basically just a ban on OHKO moves, and this one is so obvious.
Evasion Items/Moves Clause: Same as OHKO Clause in that its obvious why this is around
Endless Battles Clause: Yeah, uhh, self explanatory
HP Percentage Clause: Just some QOL improvements, and something you can replicate in game by using a ruler or smthing and approximating the HP ranges.
Sleep Moves Clause: Basically a sleep moves ban.
The only times we have used specific clauses are 1. Sleep Moves Clause, which we just got rid of because it didn't work in practice. and 2. Freeze Clause in some old gens, which was because in those gens, freeze was WAY worse then it is now. Gen 1 freeze you literally can never unthaw from, so it is actually an OHKO.

Freeze Clause is nowhere close to the other clauses listed, and the only one its close to is Old Gen Freeze Clause, which again, are way, way more destructive then modern freeze.

Most of these things seem to be from Kyurem, which honestly just shows this is you wanting for Kyurem to be banned because it can abuse freeze like nothing else.
Also, you missed Moltres, a really big mon.

So should we ban critical hits? They can potentially lose you the game on the spot if you have an utimely one. Or what about para? That is another status condition that has a way higher payoff because it sticks around. Or what about flinching? I think we all know a certain waterfall gyarados moment...
But I think you get the point, pokemon is full of RNG. We accept that. But removing an entire mechanic, from what I could read, to nerf one, maybe two mons (every other mon that uses ice moves is nowhere close to being a problem due to freeze), isn't really good. You haven't really given any reasoning why we should change the status quo beyond "well, it potentially loses you the game" which can also be said for way more RNG mechanics.
Everyone has lost (and won) many more games due to a timely crit or full para or even flinch than freeze, but we are talking about freeze for some reason.
 
was about to build a Kommo-o team (probably my 100th one) when i noticed that its sets were updated, i knew special clangorous was a thing, but when did physical clangorous soul pop off?
I don't think I've ever seen a physical Kommo-o that wasn't sub/drain punch. Special Bulletproof Kommo-o to me is super sick, especially on web teams. You can fish for a Court Change from Cinderace, and get a free Clanging Scales boost. Paired with throat spray, its super fun to set up.
 
So anyway, according to Pikalytics, Kyurem is 17th in usage only 2 percentage points avobe Percharunt (hopefully OU soon), who is itself barely avobe Darkrai. What are we thinking?
 
We are likely at a (brief) standstill. There is not substantial support to act on much of anything at this moment. Gliscor did not get banned, but can be discussed in the distant future. Kyurem did not get banned, but can be discussed in the near future. Other Pokemon like Ogerpon-Wellspring (among others) can remain on our radar, but nothing stands out to a damning degree.

We will re-open topics on process oriented matters in the near future in all likelihood, but more on that will come.

I do expect further engagement in the near future (perhaps survey? perhaps prompting topics here? TBD), so stay tuned for that.
 
So anyway, according to Pikalytics, Kyurem is 17th in usage only 2 percentage points avobe Percharunt (hopefully OU soon), who is itself barely avobe Darkrai. What are we thinking?
I mean, Kyurem is just hard to build with and always has been. It's a scary threat but it needs strong hazard control and help getting in on the field. Kyurem's always had less usage than it deserves because it's not as splashable as everything else. If you look at the mons above it, you get staples like the grounds, booster mons, Gambit, Zama, Oger, mons that are just way easier to slap on a team and do well with. Although I will say all the top mons rn are offense staples, which Kyurem doesn't do as amazing against. That might be keeping it down too.
 
We are likely at a (brief) standstill. There is not substantial support to act on much of anything at this moment. Gliscor did not get banned, but can be discussed in the distant future. Kyurem did not get banned, but can be discussed in the near future. Other Pokemon like Ogerpon-Wellspring (among others) can remain on our radar, but nothing stands out to a damning degree.

We will re-open topics on process oriented matters in the near future in all likelihood, but more on that will come.

I do expect further engagement in the near future (perhaps survey? perhaps prompting topics here? TBD), so stay tuned for that.
when do you think the next survey will be released? It is hard to say what people want atm until we get concrete data imo
 
Even though I’m not usually one to bring up old topics, I wanted to revisit the discussion about Hoopa Unbound and its Custap Berry set. I’m also wondering if Roaring Moon could make good use of Incinerate. Do you think Wish passing on Roaring Moon, with the threat of Dragon Dance and no webs, would make people look at it differently? It’s funny, but Primarina, which is a core pick on fat teams, also runs a Custap Berry set. Do you think this could lead to another suspect test, especially if Primarina (or one of its sets) keeps fat teams strong in the meta? Oh, and don’t forget, Great Tusk sometimes runs the berry too.
My brother in christ knock off is literally moon's best move
 
Tera blast ranked as a concern as much as gliscor but not even on the radar at this time. Guard railed discussion is how it appears.

Just be honest has a directive come from Big Smogon to resist even a Tera Blast ban?

If you were to tell people in the thread to discuss X as broken the conversation would go there and they would likely be lead to supporting a X suspect. Tera Blast organically gets gliscor level support and its not worth discussing when there's never been a more clear time to look at it, if ever. Just tell us that BigSmogon doesn't want it and you don't think it's a big enough deal to fight against. Tell me that and I'll never bring it up again. I know there's some -resistance- to banning generational mechanic but does Tera blast fall under that umbrella?
 
Tera blast ranked as a concern as much as gliscor but not even on the radar at this time. Guard railed discussion is how it appears.

Just be honest has a directive come from Big Smogon to resist even a Tera Blast ban?

If you were to tell people in the thread to discuss X as broken the conversation would go there and they would likely be lead to supporting a X suspect. Tera Blast organically gets gliscor level support and its not worth discussing when there's never been a more clear time to look at it, if ever. Just tell us that BigSmogon doesn't want it and you don't think it's a big enough deal to fight against. Tell me that and I'll never bring it up again. I know there's some -resistance- to banning generational mechanic but does Tera blast fall under that umbrella?
I may not personally want a tera blast ban but clearly there is much support for a suspect. I agree that if smogon is refusing they should at least tell us. It is crazy to me that they banned sleep without even giving it a chance (I am still disgusted they didn't even let us have a suspect that) and now they are doing the same with Tera blast on the opposite end of the spectrum. When does this injustice end?
 
There is no conspiracy from the OU Council to not do anything to ban Tera Blast. The support is just not there for there to be action on Tera Blast, and the next survey in December will confirm that to be the case.
1_GI-td9gs8D5OKZd19mAOqA.png

Tera Blast organically gets gliscor level support and its not worth discussing when there's never been a more clear time to look at it, if ever.
From what the guy above is saying there is plenty of support for a Tera blast suspect so why would the survey prove that untrue?
 
Pecharunt is 100% rising to OU imo, it’s just that good and not that hard to fit on balance / BO teams imo. A T-Spikes absorber with Hex that win long term vs non tera Steel Zama, 1v1 utility Gliscor, Spread Poison easily, check Waterpon, non Psyshock Valiant, chipped Prim…
It’s insane how good its bulk is (bulkier physically than SKARMORY). Even while being useless usually vs steel mons without tera I’d say it‘s at least a top 25 mon in OU
 
View attachment 691063

From what the guy above is saying there is plenty of support for a Tera blast suspect so why would the survey prove that untrue?

That was from the previous survey of OLT qualifers in which Tera Blast scored a 3.0. In any case, I'd bank on there not being enough support with how few mons commonly run Tera Blast with Tera Blast even becoming less common on some of its most common users since then.
 
That was from the previous survey of OLT qualifers in which Tera Blast scored a 3.0. In any case, I'd bank on there not being enough support with how few mons commonly run Tera Blast with Tera Blast even becoming less common on some of its most common users since then.
You know what you are right that was last survey and there aren't as many tera blast abusers right now. However for one thing they acted on both kyurem and gliscor and Tera blast had a similar amount of support. And for another thing those few Tera blast abusers are some of the best pokemon in the tier (kingambit iron moth etc) so I don't think it is a stretch to say that we could get a similar amount of support as last survey. You do make some good points tho and I am sorry if my last post was a bit too harsh
 
I dunno why we should ban tera blast specifically, its not used in most teams and the main reason most of the people who want it banned want it banned because they are aware of the lack of support for a tera ban, with some of them even outright against the ban of such

Furthermore, when was the last time you saw tera blast itself tampering with the meta? emphasis on the itself part
 
I dunno why we should ban tera blast specifically, its not used in most teams and the main reason most of the people who want it banned want it banned because they are aware of the lack of support for a tera ban, with some of them even outright against the ban of such

Furthermore, when was the last time you saw tera blast itself tampering with the meta? emphasis on the itself part
Tera Blast is a contributing factor in Kyurem’s set variety which was a primary target of its second suspect. Banning it would make Kyurem even more manageable. This isn’t a Kyurem issue, because this also happened with Volcarona and is arguably making Iron Moth to deal with because of Tera Blast Ground.

Tera Blast is arguably uncompetitive because it exacerbates Tera’s ability to allow mons to win matchups that they otherwise wouldn’t, but it’s one thing to change your type and another to just flat out gain coverage that you wouldn’t have otherwise.
 
Really hope tera blast is the next suspect. The tier would benefit a lot from having Volc back and that move gone. Would also kill off physical DD kyurem, which is good to limit that mon.
Why would Volc benefit the meta? Just seems annoying to me as another Flame Body user who will incentivize more Fire types in the meta which will incentivize more Grounds and as a result more Waters and... hmm. As I type this, I realize it might actually result in more metagame diversity.

I don't really understand the DD Kyurem thing though,
+1 252+ Atk Kyurem Scale Shot (5 hits) vs. 80 HP / 252 Def Volcarona: 350-420 (105.7 - 126.8%) -- guaranteed OHKO

You mean special Kyurem?
 
Why would Volc benefit the meta? Just seems annoying to me as another Flame Body user who will incentivize more Fire types in the meta which will incentivize more Grounds and as a result more Waters and... hmm. As I type this, I realize it might actually result in more metagame diversity.

I don't really understand the DD Kyurem thing though,
+1 252+ Atk Kyurem Scale Shot (5 hits) vs. 80 HP / 252 Def Volcarona: 350-420 (105.7 - 126.8%) -- guaranteed OHKO

You mean special Kyurem?
I mentioned physical DD Kyurem mainly in the context of a tera blast ban and not Volc, as it would no longer have physical coverage for Steels. Regarding special Kyurem, Volc would be the perfect SubTect Kyurem answer, with reliable recovery and breaking through sub with Bug Buzz. I think a Tera Blast ban and Volc unban would ease the concerns of those who thought Kyurem was broken. Also, Volc's defensive profile would help a lot with top tier threats such as Val, Ghold, Zama, Gambit, Kyurem, and discourage Rai/Bolt special spam stuff.
 
Back
Top