Was going to laugh react for the agenda but you want a woger ban.I disagree on your take on Kingambit. Although it's certainly powerful, using it effectively in endgame requires you to play the rest of the game skillfully and without using Tera on another mon. Being in a situation where a game comes down to a Kingambit 50/50 means that either your team wasn't sufficiently equipped to handle Kingambit or you simply got outplayed. Gambit's non-Sucker moves lack priority, obviously, and it's incredibly slow. This means that offensive counterplay is prevalent, as Gambit is not so powerful that it can KO dark resists with Sucker unless they're already incredibly chipped. Defensively countering it is also, although admittedly not particularly easy, quite possible, with Dondozo handling most sets (although admittedly only really fitting on stall) and combos of other solid defensive mons being able to take it on as well. Sure, Kingambit can clean up if its counters are all gone, but that applies to basically every offensive threat in the metagame, and without its counters gone Gambit can't really sweep, unlike mons like Moon which can blast past both offensive and defensive checks alike if they're allowed to setup.
I also disagree with Gliscor being unhealthy. It provides a unique combination of absorbing Knock Off and passive recovery that nothing else can provide to stall in a generation where stall generally struggles to be viable, while also providing good utility to other types of teams. In my opinion, Waterpon is more unhealthy than both Gambit and Gliscor, as there is exactly one mon that defensively checks all sets (Amoongus) and it gets 2HKOd by +2 Tera Water Ivy Cudgel. Unlike other insane stallbreakers like Ursaluna and Hoopa-Unbound, however, Waterpon is fast enough to also work well into more offensive teams.
Better players than me have already made all of these points, but I figured I'd say it since the Likeshop thing is incentivising me to be more active on forums.