This conversation has, once again, long outlived any usefulness, and gone wildly off-topic. Reminder that unban discussion are not allowed on this thread, and for everyone to be more civil in their discussions.
I don't particularly know if this is answering the question, but I think Clefable is currently ranked too high. I do not believe that Clefable is in the same tier of viability as pokemon like Hatterene or Alomomola (same for Walking Wake but that isn't my point). The only place I really see Clefable (though tbf I don't see it that often in general) is on stall teams which are not very good at the moment. Clefable's bulk is also not really the same anymore as thanks to power creep it is tanking a lot more powerful hits than in gens 6-8. We have such insane monsters like Wogerpon and Kingambit that are easily able to put the pressure on Clefable and there isn't that much it can do in return aside from spreading status and using knock off. Still though, both of those things are useful and Clefable still has good bulk so it isn't out right bad. I just don't think it deserves to be in A-. I think it could reasonably be ranked B as I feel the same about it as I feel a lot of pokemon ranked there (at least the ones that actually make sense there) but I would understand if it was ranked B+ instead.yeah let's go ahead and change the subject
i've had this question bouncing around in my head for a while and i wanted to ask everyone:
what are your hottest positive and negative viability-related takes?
i.e., what's the most obscure low-tier mon that everyone thinks is garbage but you think is great? and what's the biggest meta mon that everyone thinks is great but you think is garbage?
The removal of one of the only strong, splashable knock + pivoting options (Moon, who also served as a check to Woger) directly drives up the usage of it's competitors in that slot, Woger being by far the biggest one. Other beneficiaries of Moon's ban also indirectly benefit Woger, such as the rise of both Scarf and Metal Coat Ghold (the #2 and #3 most used items on Ghold during OLT). With Woger checking both of these sets, it also serves crucial defensive utility in some games. Woger-Glim-Gambit has also been a very notable core recently that helped multiple players qualify for OLT and also has won recently in tour, which is definitely healthier than webs and veil cheese.I think the fact Ogerpon has only gotten more relevant with time vs less goes to show its not exactly going anywhere. It's had some downs, but overall it's stayed conssitently good and consistently around. Which is precisely the reason i think its worth investigating as Ogerpon innovations have only really increased.
1.yeah let's go ahead and change the subject
i've had this question bouncing around in my head for a while and i wanted to ask everyone:
what are your hottest positive and negative viability-related takes?
i.e., what's the most obscure low-tier mon that everyone thinks is garbage but you think is great? and what's the biggest meta mon that everyone thinks is great but you think is garbage?
I mean, it's not like Moltres is letting Ogerpon come in every time bc of the possibility of Wisp or Brave Bird on switch in, and it also commonly runs U-turn or Roar with hazards as well. And even then if you're team ends up being weak to it you can always run tera Dragon + Wisp on Molt to turn the tables on it. I don't think a defensive pokemon is bad just because one of the biggest threats in the tier easily kills it. Nobody is saying Gliscor is bad because Ogerpon beats it.1.Meowscarada is A tier if not A+. It's able to enter on View attachment 769614 and u turn to do Major damage, kill View attachment 769611View attachment 769612and View attachment 769613![]()
with triple axel, flower trick can kill wellspring After tera, Garganacl and is in general great. And either knock off to, well.. Knock off or use scarf trick to practically destroy defensive pokemon while outspeeding even booster valiant or band to do GREAT damage. and yes. it has defensive counters. but by using choice trick it can beat them and...
2. I think Moltres and Zapdos are Overrated with a capital O. other than defensive utility Zapdos and especially Moltres are forced to use boots because of rocks. they aren't especially fast or bulky or want to use power. Moltres is horrible against wellspring (so there's a 25% chance Moltres is useless) and Zapdos just is really passive and a huge momentum sink
1.Meowscarada is A tier if not A+. It's able to enter on View attachment 769614 and u turn to do Major damage, kill View attachment 769611View attachment 769612and View attachment 769613![]()
with triple axel, flower trick can kill wellspring After tera, Garganacl and is in general great. And either knock off to, well.. Knock off or use scarf trick to practically destroy defensive pokemon while outspeeding even booster valiant or band to do GREAT damage. and yes. it has defensive counters. but by using choice trick it can beat them and...
2. I think Moltres and Zapdos are Overrated with a capital O. other than defensive utility Zapdos and especially Moltres are forced to use boots because of rocks. they aren't especially fast or bulky or want to use power. Moltres is horrible against wellspring (so there's a 25% chance Moltres is useless) and Zapdos just is really passive and a huge momentum sink
yeah let's go ahead and change the subject
i've had this question bouncing around in my head for a while and i wanted to ask everyone:
what are your hottest positive and negative viability-related takes?
i.e., what's the most obscure low-tier mon that everyone thinks is garbage but you think is great? and what's the biggest meta mon that everyone thinks is great but you think is garbage?
Moltres and Zapdos are more pivots than breakers in SV OU right now. I don't think either are that overrated at all. Having Roost + U-turn + random status haxxing at the right moment always has a spot with their bulk (and yes, Zapdos does run U-turn over Volt Switch on some pivot sets to get out against bulky Ground types). I wouldn't switch Moltres on to Wellspring of course, but if I need to get chip on Tusk I'd roll the dice.1.Meowscarada is A tier if not A+. It's able to enter on View attachment 769614 and u turn to do Major damage, kill View attachment 769611View attachment 769612and View attachment 769613![]()
with triple axel, flower trick can kill wellspring After tera, Garganacl and is in general great. And either knock off to, well.. Knock off or use scarf trick to practically destroy defensive pokemon while outspeeding even booster valiant or band to do GREAT damage. and yes. it has defensive counters. but by using choice trick it can beat them and...
2. I think Moltres and Zapdos are Overrated with a capital O. other than defensive utility Zapdos and especially Moltres are forced to use boots because of rocks. they aren't especially fast or bulky or want to use power. Moltres is horrible against wellspring (so there's a 25% chance Moltres is useless) and Zapdos just is really passive and a huge momentum sink
Woger does provide defensive utility yes, however is that worth keeping such an oppressive Pokémon in the tier? Aside from the fact that most people, myself included don't consider Gholdengo to be broken (and the main argument for it's brokeness is its ability to block defog, not ghold itself). In fact Woger's ability to switch into guys like Great Tusk, Iron Treads, Hrott, and Walking Wake (none of which are anywhere near passive) is part of what makes it so difficult to deal with, since these pokemon, especially the first two, are so essential to so many teams.The removal of one of the only strong, splashable knock + pivoting options (Moon, who also served as a check to Woger) directly drives up the usage of it's competitors in that slot, Woger being by far the biggest one. Other beneficiaries of Moon's ban also indirectly benefit Woger, such as the rise of both Scarf and Metal Coat Ghold (the #2 and #3 most used items on Ghold during OLT). With Woger checking both of these sets, it also serves crucial defensive utility in some games. Woger-Glim-Gambit has also been a very notable core recently that helped multiple players qualify for OLT and also has won recently in tour, which is definitely healthier than webs and veil cheese.
Woger hardly needs perfect coverage honestly. Let's take your example of play rough. Even without it, resists like kyurem and bolt (especially the former with it's SR weakness, struggle to switch into Ivy cudgel more than once and both despise knock off. Not to mention you don't even know it's set to begin with.We need to be very careful about bans going forward, because the tier relies on these interactions to keep threats in check. The term "broken checks broken" is thrown out a lot, but this is a situation where 'mons are preventing each other from reaching broken status by limiting usage or movesets (such as Kyurem/Bolt making Woger run PRough). These are healthy dynamics that need to be preserved to ensure that a variety of viable styles.
Winrate isn't as important as you might think. After all the "best" pokemon in the tier, Zamazenta, is consistently posting winrates around 40-50%. Not to mention 20 games isn't even close to a sufficient sample size. It's effectiveness is undeniable and is reflected in how it has risen to the #2 pokemon on ladder and is always near the top in tours as well. It's clear winrate is a shaky metric to determine brokenness atp.Woger's overall winrate also fails to paint it as this unstoppable threat: despite its high usage, it maintains a similar winrate to most other top tier Pokemon in WCoP, sitting comfortably around 50%. In fact, its usage and winrate actually dropped greatly during playoffs, winning only 8/20 games. This was despite the presence of plenty of balance, demonstrated by the high usage rates of bulky staples like Gliscor, Corviknight, Glowking, Ting-Lu, and Weezing-Galar. Usage was driven to it by the ban of its biggest teambuilding competitor, but that number is just an indicator that the tier needs its unique traits.
Instead of just saying this, what should we be retesting? Gouging and Volcarona where overwhelmingly banned, and despite what CTC glazers would like you to believe a retest won't change that. The idea of freeing moon is also asinine, considering it was banned only a few months ago and it's vote wasn't particularly close either.The current metagame, while I find it boring, does not have any 'mons that I feel are currently banworthy. I agree with the sentiment above that we should look into retests instead for progression. Gen 9 is very unique as a tier and we should treat it as such.
Not them, but I'm going through the list of Tiering Actions, and unless you can convince a majority of, well lets just go with Qualified Voters on a Survey given these were all either =<70% ban support or 7/9 council bans, to unban Iron Bundle, Annihilape, Ogerpon-H, or Roaring Moon (this one is the least likely because it "just" happened), I don't think any of them will actually happen.Instead of just saying this, what should we be retesting?
My low-tier that's good is Hydrapple, and my meta that's shit has got to be Pecharunt. Being walled by Steel types which are quite common on teams has to suck.i.e., what's the most obscure low-tier mon that everyone thinks is garbage but you think is great? and what's the biggest meta mon that everyone thinks is great but you think is garbage?
yeah let's go ahead and change the subject
i've had this question bouncing around in my head for a while and i wanted to ask everyone:
what are your hottest positive and negative viability-related takes?
i.e., what's the most obscure low-tier mon that everyone thinks is garbage but you think is great? and what's the biggest meta mon that everyone thinks is great but you think is garbage?
I would even argue you don't have to run boots on Zapdos if you have the right support. It is only 2x weak to rock so it can come in more often than Moltres could without boots and due to that it can afford to run leftovers or rocky helmet which I think is quite useful in this tier considering physical pivoters are quite common in this tier. Meowscarada, Cinderace, Wogerpon, (Choice Scarf) Hamurott, and Corviknight already hate Zapdos for the potential to get paralyzed when they click their precious U-Turn/Flip Turn so the extra chip from rocky helmet is all the more useful.As for the Zap/Molt take, I can’t even understand it. They’re both bulky enough to do their job well, as evidenced by their continued success and tenure in this tier. Being forced to use boots is not the end of the world, they’re quite fast for the defensive pokemon they tend to be and even if they weren’t… why is that relevant? They’re doing their defensive duty well.
Maushold and Hydrapple are OU. Maushold as a sweeper is something I've been leaning more into as of late outside of just an encore bot, and it seriously rocks. I've had great success with a unique TB set up for it and it's been preforming outstandingly well. I need to tinker the team more before I share, but I love this thing.yeah let's go ahead and change the subject
i've had this question bouncing around in my head for a while and i wanted to ask everyone:
what are your hottest positive and negative viability-related takes?
i.e., what's the most obscure low-tier mon that everyone thinks is garbage but you think is great? and what's the biggest meta mon that everyone thinks is great but you think is garbage?
Ok so for my low tier mon it'll be fezandipiti, volcanion, and hydrapple. These guys have insane amount of defensive utility, with Fezan checking rai val and bolt, volcanion sits on alo and being a wisp bot vs stuff like gambit, and hydrapple checking wellspring and zamayeah let's go ahead and change the subject
i've had this question bouncing around in my head for a while and i wanted to ask everyone:
what are your hottest positive and negative viability-related takes?
i.e., what's the most obscure low-tier mon that everyone thinks is garbage but you think is great? and what's the biggest meta mon that everyone thinks is great but you think is garbage?
yeah let's go ahead and change the subject
i've had this question bouncing around in my head for a while and i wanted to ask everyone:
what are your hottest positive and negative viability-related takes?
i.e., what's the most obscure low-tier mon that everyone thinks is garbage but you think is great? and what's the biggest meta mon that everyone thinks is great but you think is garbage?
why male and not female?
I'm not too familiar with Smogon formats but in my experience indeedee male is really only better than female in psyspam
Male is the more used one between the two (still niche), female has more bulk so it might be worth tinkering with tho.
| 98 | Indeedee | 1.08835% | 24447 | 1.088% | 21272 | 1.194% |I'm not too familiar with Smogon formats but in my experience indeedee male is really only better than female in psyspam
as I said I'm not familiar with Smogon I'm trying to learn it so all my prior knowledge will come from vgc please explain why instead of just giving stats I was told here was a good place to learn and improve on my singles skills I'm sorry if I'm being hard| 98 | Indeedee | 1.08835% | 24447 | 1.088% | 21272 | 1.194% |
| 267 | Indeedee-F | 0.16650% | 3740 | 0.166% | 3111 | 0.175% |
Source
From my understanding Indeedee-F's main niche in VGC aside from setting psyterrain is sitting on the field and using doubles-only supporting moves like follow me and helping hand. In singles, as Hon07rial mentioned, it barely does anything else outside of psyterrain. This means that a) You would only ever use either Indeedee form on a psyspam team and b) If you do use it, you want it to output damage with expanding force to be able to do something while it's on the field.as I said I'm not familiar with Smogon I'm trying to learn it so all my prior knowledge will come from vgc please explain why instead of just giving stats I was told here was a good place to learn and improve on my singles skills I'm sorry if I'm being hard