• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

NOC WikiMafia 2 Game Thread [Day 2]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Psypsypsypsypsythe said:
in a scenario where tommy, through some means, is made to target flandrs separately but myself and bliz in tandem based on other roles, and he can only have a maximum of two other players in his neighbor chat, how do you resolve who gets added to the chat? Celever
Click to expand...
rewording because I can only answer hypotheticals so it's ofc not player-specific

in answer to the question (according to Tommy's claim):

in a scenario where a neighbouriser who can usually only recruit two people, through some means, is made to target player a separately but players b and c in tandem based on other roles, and he can only have a maximum of two other players in his neighbor chat, how do you resolve who gets added to the chat?

The answer is all three players would be added to the chat. Simultaneous resolution means there's no way to determine who should be added over anyone else under normal conditions.
 
Blizihguh said:
If this is unusually strong play for saber then that explains a lot tbh. I don't mean that as a dig at saber, just, some people view this game very differently from me, I have seen people play similar to this as town occasionally. But I didn't know that was their meta, and in general I think this sort of play comes more often from scum. Do other people agree about the meta thing? If other people want to confirm that saber's play is in line with their meta I might reconsider my vote, but at this point I feel like my strongest non-saber scumreads/people I'd vote are like:
1. Tommy (nobody is going with me on this so what's the point in voting them)
2. liquid (should probably be replaced anyway? I mean they've made like eight posts and apparently they don't have access to the forum, idk)
3. HydrogenHydreigon (I was fairly sus on them but I think Tommy and bd make a good point that their claim would be very weird play as scum)
4. DeadByDaylight (this read is somewhat weaker than my read on HH, and significantly weaker than my reads on saber and Tommy. But they'd be next in line for my vote I suppose)
Click to expand...
this is a bit of a hasty progression on saber
Blizihguh said:
Oh Phoopes is on and catching up now (he liked my post)

Hi Phoopes, excited to read your takes

...tomorrow. Bye Phoopes
Click to expand...
phoopes has done this a couple times where hes popped into thread to drop a like on a post but doesnt actually make any posts or talk about anything
Tommy said:
Honestly I think it’s too little too late for bluedoom to salvage himself in my eyes now, the only way is if he survives and votes mafia

You pulled the same thing last game and I gave you grace after being right that you just disengage as mafia, then when you’re about to be voted or under pressure you come on and do a flurry and put on a show as you’re capable of doing when you’re invested, but you’re even bringing up stuff about pebble which I found scummy last game, when you were scum

Your posts are fine now but I have to kind of trust that you’re able to make good posts as mafia, but the way to read you is how last minute you care, and it’s only when you seem to come under pressure imo which is mafia you
Click to expand...
would be wild if bluedoom just did the exact same thing as mafia lol
liquidrelief said:
im also sus on psy for meaninglessly targeting gen and flanders is also on my sight
Click to expand...
liquidrelief said:
mostly due to agreeing with psy
Click to expand...
you think im suspicious but you also agree with me about flandrs? and if my push on them is meaningless why do you agree with it? inherently if there is the ability for it to be agreed with there would have to be substance and meaning within it
liquidrelief said:
ik im not des but bluedoom might be maf due to his article
Click to expand...
no no no no do not vote based off of this
 
Tommy said:
Honestly I think it’s too little too late for bluedoom to salvage himself in my eyes now, the only way is if he survives and votes mafia

You pulled the same thing last game and I gave you grace after being right that you just disengage as mafia, then when you’re about to be voted or under pressure you come on and do a flurry and put on a show as you’re capable of doing when you’re invested, but you’re even bringing up stuff about pebble which I found scummy last game, when you were scum

Your posts are fine now but I have to kind of trust that you’re able to make good posts as mafia, but the way to read you is how last minute you care, and it’s only when you seem to come under pressure imo which is mafia you
Click to expand...
i really DO NOT LIKE that no one has really engaged with this post at all, including bluedoom. this is a complete and utter damnation of his play in this game, but instead people are trusting the catchup and shifting more towards saber. it all feels kind of weak to me

##VOTE: bluedoom
 
VOTECOUNT 2.3

saber (6) - pulsar512b, Blizihguh, phoopes, genisu, bluedoom, HydrogenHydreigon
bluedoom (5) - realiti, des121, Tommy, liquidrelief, Psy
Psy (1) - Peum
pulsar512b (1) - saber
genisu (1) - Flandrs

Not Voting (4) - a fairy, ShyPebble, Dead by Daylight, AirC

3 hours 20 mins remain

With 18 players alive, it takes 10 voteweight to hammer.

Also I'm gonna be afk for like between a bit and a while
 
Psypsypsypsypsythe said:
in a scenario where tommy, through some means, is made to target flandrs separately but myself and bliz in tandem based on other roles, and he can only have a maximum of two other players in his neighbor chat, how do you resolve who gets added to the chat? Celever
Click to expand...

I already asked and confirmed it would go over 3 in this scenario privately, said this earlier in thread

So I didn’t end up on bliz for some reason confirmed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top