• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

Process Guide Workshop for Create-A-Pokemon.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Righteo. I came up with this a while after the post before my last. I PMed DJD, and he said to post it here for feedback (inb4stealing)

I would like to post a poll, similar to the one that asked "Would you participate in the CAP Project". It would be the named Upgrade project.

Running parallel to the CAP Project, it would have the intention of upgrading pokemon that are in NU or UU that haven't been cut enough slack and would like to see the light of day.

Heres how it would Hypothetically run:

(Bear with me, this is off the top of my head. Adjustments will be made as necessary)

Part 1: Poll 1: Pick type (17, Bold vote. May be limited.)

Part 2: Poll 2: Pick a Pokemon that is of the type chosen in Poll 1, for us to Upgrade. (Bold vote.)

Part 3: Poll 3: Pick a typing for that Evolution. (Bold vote)

Part 4: Poll 4/Discussion 1: Discuss the Base stats and Movepool adjustments needed to bring that Pokemon into the light of day.

Part 5: Art thread 1: Submissions are taken for art of the evo, based on Typing and pre-existing game art.

Part 6: Poll 5: The most popular submissions are polled, and official art chosen. (Thread poll)

Part 7: Discussion 2: Based on the official art, movepool, base stats, and ability are chosen. The viability of things from poll 4 are discussed. Additional egg groups are also discussed, along with additional egg moves if needed. (Run off of poll 4.)

Part 8: Poll 6: The most popular of each of these discussed in poll 7 are ran up and voted (Thread vote, perhaps bold.)

Part 9: Art thread 2: Sprite submissions for the official art are taken.

Part 10: Poll 7: Sprite submissions are voted on. (Thread poll)

Polls can and will be subtracted or added as necessary.

The reason this takes less time then the CAP is because we have a template made to work with. This also serves to bring out everyones Inner Fanboy/girl and lets the CAP deal strictly with Metagame balancing issues. I'll provide additional detail if people approve.

Thoughts?
 
I kinda figured someone would ask Doug if we could do that and I said it's a good idea. For all the people who seriously want to make a evolution/fanboy pokemon can finally stop whining about us not allowing it. I don't have much of a problem with how the process for it look atm.
 
Thanks for the feedback G_T.

Still looking for some more though. This would also free up the CAP to strictly let it balance the metagame; and this would bring UU/NU Pokes out of the shadow of Never being used.
 
I like this idea. Only thing you need to make sure of is that the art threads for Evolution and New Pokemon don't run together at the same time, or else we'll see diminishing quality on both sides. Same for spriting.

Also for Part 2, the "pick a Pokemon of that type to evolve", I believe this should be a discussion, followed up with a vote. This way you don't get people going "I wntz teh Pikachu to be Pikablu!" or other crap like that. You have people submit choices for evolution, along with reasoning. Any choices that are applicable and have proper reasoning moves on to the poll.

On Part 4, I'd also add ability to that list, as some Pokemon can change abilities upon evolution, which can be the kick in the pants some Pokemon need.

For Part 7 and apparently Part 8 as well, I think egg moves are something that should not be touched. That's one of the problems with an evolution, you can only work foward, not backwards. As such, egg moves would be altering the base line of that Pokemon, not the new evolution.
 
In general, I like this idea.

We have talked about running concurrent projects before. I like that if we had multiple projects that filled two different purposes, it would make it easier to distinguish. Obviously, there are a lot of people interested in new evolutions. Based on the activity level on this project, I think we probably have enough participation to sustain two projects at one time. We had multiple qualified candidates for TL and we regularly have to drop good art submissions and sprites.

I'm not sure about the mission statement for an evolution project. Do we just acknowledge that it's a fan effort and not try to make it balance the metagame? If we did that, it would make an even clearer distinction from the new pokemon projects. We would have one "serious" project, and one "fun" project. I can see the appeal of something like that.

On the other hand, maybe we should make the evolution project hold to the same standard of competitiveness as the new pokemon project? If we do that, we have both projects aligned from a purpose standpoint, which would avoid confusion when moving back-and-forth between projects. Basically, the same conceptual rules would apply equally to both projects.

I do think a project timeline would need to be developed. An evolution project should take less time overall. I agree with Dane that the projects should be staggered so as to not overlap on any of the art or spriting threads.

Also, the project would need to have a TL selected, just like the regular project. Just because Aki posted the idea here, would not mean he is named the TL by acclimation.

I am worried this will be perceived as purely a fanboy effort. I'm concerned that would hurt the credibility of the entire CAP project, which is something that all of us have worked very hard to establish. If we manage it properly, I think we can "do it right". But, we need to make sure we plan it properly before jumping in.

I'm interested to hear what others have to say on this.
 
I don't see creating evolutions as inherently "non-competitive." Sure, it might appeal to the fanboy in all of us, but I don't see that as a bad thing. Creativity isn't stifled, it's just a slightly different framework to work in than usual. Hell, if they evolve early with some sort of stone you even have a whole lot of liberty with the move listings and can give whatever ability you want :/
 
For the EaP Project (so as to differentiate it in thread titles), it should have the following fall into each catagory:

Competitive:
Stat increases
Movepool changes
Ability Changes
Secondary Type Changes

Fan:
Art
Pokemon chosen to evolve


This way, the "fanboys" can create their evolved Pokemon by assisting in choosing the art and the Pokemon evolved. As I stated previously though, the Pokemon chosen to evolve will need reasons to back it up, otherwise we leave ourselves open to alternate Charizards, alternate Pikachus, etc etc.

Then, the competitive battlers can have a usable Pokemon by assisting in the movepool, abilities, secondary typing changes, and stats. Since these are the important aspects of competitive battling, it would still be serious, but can be fun too.
 
I like this idea a lot, but I think you're polling order needs reworking quite seriously I have edited in all the changes I propose.

Also I have changed the "part X: poll X" bit to the EaP X:part 1 a/b/c: <what we are polling> format.

EaP X: Part 1: Topic Leader Discussion
Chose topic leader, same format as CaP.

EaP X: Part 2a: Pokemon Poll
Pick a Pokemon for us to evolve, give explanations for choice. (Bold vote.)

EaP X: Part 2b: Pokemon Poll
Pick a Pokemon for us to evolve, only the top 2-4 (depending on how close Part 2a was, TL's choice) Pokemon from Part 2a are options, OP should have quotes of arguments for each Pokemon. (Bold vote.)

EaP X: Part 3: Typing Poll
Pick a typing for the new Evolution, options on the poll should be any that where suggested in previous polls. (Thread poll)
Begin discussing Base Stat spreads, Movepool additions and possible Ability changes.

EaP X: Art thread
Open the art thread now. Submissions are taken for art of the evo, based on Typing and pre-existing game art.

EaP X: Part 4a: Base stat Discussion
Continue discussing the Base stats, Movepool adjustments and Ability changes needed to bring that Pokemon into the light of day.
Base Stat spreads should be submitted here.

EaP X: Part 4b: Base stat spread poll
5-8 options submitted by chosen individuals or ones that lots of people in the last thread liked. (Thread Poll)
If the result is close do a Part 4c with the top 2-3 options.
Movepools should be submitted here.

EaP X: Part 5a: Art poll
The most popular art submissions from the art thread are polled. (Thread poll)
Add in a Part 5b if the results are close.

EaP X: Sprite Thread: Open this now; sprite submissions for the official art are taken.

EaP X: Part 6a: Movepool Poll
Vote on movepools; put the most popular 3 from the last threads on the poll. (Thread Poll)
If there are disagreements about a few particular moves poll them (by bold text voting) in a Part 6b.
Discuss Ability changes.

EaP X: Part 7: Ability Poll
The most popular ability changes from the previous polls, one option should be leaving them as they are. (Thread poll)
Add in a Part 7b if it's close.

EaP X: Part 8: Sprite Poll
Sprite submissions are voted on. (Thread poll)

EaP X: Part 8: Finishing Touches
Discuss and vote on (by bold text) the final details like height and weight.

Return to Part 1

Polls should be added if the results of any vote are close, they should be subtracted only if there is a VERY clear winner in the previous thread.

Additional egg groups are also discussed, along with additional egg moves if needed.
Has any Pokemon ever changed egg groups when evolving? Also adding egg moves to existing Pokemon is kinda against the CaP idea, though it could be done.
 
Actually eric, I think the idea of voting on typing first is more efficient. That way when you get to the Pokemon themselves, it's a more concise list and you don't have the same 20 Pokemon being explained every time.
 
Yes limit creativity, get a list together of pokemon that should evolve and don't be dumb and say what needs it.
Then let people make arguments for whatever the fuck they want out of that list, then you can bold vote it.
 
There are 400 some odd Pokemon. If you made that list, it would likely have between 100 and 200 Pokemon. If you don't have a poll first on type to filter out some of them, you'll end up with a bold poll result tally where about 50 things have 1-2% of the votes.

Step 1: Filter down to a reasonable amount (type)
Step 2: Vote
Step 3: ????
Step 4: Profit
 
So what happens when we end up with a typing that doesn't fit anything or only fits something which is only BL/OU, you give people the option to evolve shit like arcanine,tangrowth etc and alot will take it over evolving an UU pokemon where the typing wouldn't fit.
 
So what happens when we end up with a typing that doesn't fit anything or only fits something which is only BL/OU, you give people the option to evolve shit like arcanine,tangrowth etc and alot will take it over evolving an UU pokemon where the typing wouldn't fit.
What are you talking about? You vote on the main type like Aki posted originally, that I backed up. Don't even try giving me any BS about nothing in a specific type not being able to evolve, I just checked and every type has at least one Pokemon that could use an evolution.

Obviously Arcanine and Tangrowth wouldn't be options until other things that needed it in those typings evolved first. Especially Tangrowth. What would the reasons for evolving that be in the submission thread be? "This thing used to be OU but isn't anymore, FORCE IT INTO OU AGAIN!"?
 
I meant you obviously need to set a criteria for what you will be allowing to evolve, there is always going to be some smart arse trying to defend shit like arcanine and tangrowth getting an evolution.
 
My two cents on the matter

I always taught that evo for old good idea in the cap project but later.Why because you can say the cap project is for filling holes in the metagame but is that really happening? Not quite; what happening is competitive types for combinations all ready not in the game and since is what is happening pokemon maybe force in types or rolls that don't fit them.

I like the idea of another separate cap project that is for pokemon evo.The pokemon will get correct attention and they don't have to be force into something don't have be.We don't have make Banette into a duel type which is what would have happen in the cap poll if it was chosen.We now have choice of

A.side evo with different stats distribution (aka Gallade)
B.Pure upgrade same type (aka Dusknoir or Mismagius)
C. Upgrade with a duel type(aka Swampert)

The current cap project would not have given you these choices.As long as the same time an methodically effort is put in the Cap project it will be good thing.
 
Perhaps there could be a Evolution Candidates thread run at the same time TL candidates are being submitted. A selection panel would pick the TL and they could narrow down the list of evo candidates to a list of 10 or so. Then have a poll based on those. In that way, everyone could throw out whatever ideas they want. The panel could see which pokemon have interest and support, and they could prevent stupid stuff.

After the pokemon poll, you could do a typing poll to see what the evo type will be.
 
Has any Pokemon ever changed egg groups when evolving? Also adding egg moves to existing Pokemon is kinda against the CaP idea, though it could be done.

Well sorta yes all the baby pokemon change from "no eggs" group to whatever their breedable form egg grouping is.

they share "no eggs" egg grouping with unbreedables legendarys and ubers only to gain a breedable grouping on evolving
 
Thanks to everyone for the feedback; i'm now gonna do a short run-through of some shit i need to clarify:

In general, I like this idea.

Good.

We have talked about running concurrent projects before. I like that if we had multiple projects that filled two different purposes, it would make it easier to distinguish. Obviously, there are a lot of people interested in new evolutions. Based on the activity level on this project, I think we probably have enough participation to sustain two projects at one time. We had multiple qualified candidates for TL and we regularly have to drop good art submissions and sprites.

I'm not sure about the mission statement for an evolution project. Do we just acknowledge that it's a fan effort and not try to make it balance the metagame? If we did that, it would make an even clearer distinction from the new pokemon projects. We would have one "serious" project, and one "fun" project. I can see the appeal of something like that.

You can, but the evolution project isn't totally fun...Per se. It would be working on the CAP Mission of balancing the metagame, but instead of making stuff outta thin air, we would have a guideline to adhere to, and is would be more working on making more alternatives for a role. EG:

Current best choice for Normal/Flying: Staraptor(? Forgot name -_-)
Second best choice: Swellow
Thing everyone wants to see be the best choice (:p): Farfeched

If we overhaul Swellow or Farfeched enough, we have more alternatives for a role, and not just that one. Sure, you can use Swellow and Farfeched now, but they just arn't competitivly viable. If we make more competitivly viable options, then we don't end up with the same OU over and over again. If we differentiate all of these upgraded pokemon enough, then it makes the metagame have more flavour because you cannot just say this:

RMT:

(Generic dragon type physical sweeper)


(Generic Dragon counter)

(Generic OU Special wall)

(Generic OU Physical wall)


(Generic Levitating psychic)

(Generic Special sweeper)

If everything was made just that little bit different when we overhauled it, we could try and stop this "Pack 6 ou into a team and watch it win =DD" Buisness, as you couldn't do 6 generic roles, and you couldn't prepair for a generic special wall. Another example:

A pair of Physical/Special walls that arn't mixape weak! =OO



On the other hand, maybe we should make the evolution project hold to the same standard of competitiveness as the new pokemon project? If we do that, we have both projects aligned from a purpose standpoint, which would avoid confusion when moving back-and-forth between projects. Basically, the same conceptual rules would apply equally to both projects.

It's gotta be different enough to the CAP to let a few people's fanboy fly.

I do think a project timeline would need to be developed. An evolution project should take less time overall. I agree with Dane that the projects should be staggered so as to not overlap on any of the art or spriting threads.

Agreed: Will fix up.

Also, the project would need to have a TL selected, just like the regular project. Just because Aki posted the idea here, would not mean he is named the TL by acclimation.

It would be good ;p I'm actually not sure if i'm ready for the job...Yet. I've got a few ideas for the quick(er) Development in the CAP which still need some refining before i can show them to the community.

I am worried this will be perceived as purely a fanboy effort. I'm concerned that would hurt the credibility of the entire CAP project, which is something that all of us have worked very hard to establish. If we manage it properly, I think we can "do it right". But, we need to make sure we plan it properly before jumping in.

Knuckle down. IF it is percived as something, then let people percive it. They have to see for themselves what it is about.

I'm interested to hear what others have to say on this.

For the EaP Project (so as to differentiate it in thread titles), it should have the following fall into each catagory:

Competitive:
Stat increases
Movepool changes
Ability Changes
Secondary Type Changes

Fan:
Art
Pokemon chosen to evolve


This way, the "fanboys" can create their evolved Pokemon by assisting in choosing the art and the Pokemon evolved. As I stated previously though, the Pokemon chosen to evolve will need reasons to back it up, otherwise we leave ourselves open to alternate Charizards, alternate Pikachus, etc etc.

Everything posted will need reasoning behind it, except for the first typing poll. you may post reasoning for that, but it's not required. From then in, any votes without sufficiant reasoning (In the TL's opinion) Will NOT Be counted.

Then, the competitive battlers can have a usable Pokemon by assisting in the movepool, abilities, secondary typing changes, and stats. Since these are the important aspects of competitive battling, it would still be serious, but can be fun too.
Exactly my point.

I like this idea a lot, but I think you're polling order needs reworking quite seriously I have edited in all the changes I propose.

Right.

Also I have changed the "part X: poll X" bit to the EaP X:part 1 a/b/c: <what we are polling> format.

EaP X: Part 1: Topic Leader Discussion
Chose topic leader, same format as CaP.

This should be in a different thread alltogether: It's not really a part of the "Project" for the public, per se.

EaP X: Part 2a: Pokemon Poll
Pick a Pokemon for us to evolve, give explanations for choice. (Bold vote.)

Yes, but we really should pick a typing first, otherwise we end up with every single pokemon in UU/NU with 1 vote =s

EaP X: Part 2b: Pokemon Poll
Pick a Pokemon for us to evolve, only the top 2-4 (depending on how close Part 2a was, TL's choice) Pokemon from Part 2a are options, OP should have quotes of arguments for each Pokemon. (Bold vote.)

It shouldn't be the TL's choice. if there was a tie for 4th place, then all options should be edited in.

EaP X: Part 3: Typing Poll
Pick a typing for the new Evolution, options on the poll should be any that where suggested in previous polls. (Thread poll)
Begin discussing Base Stat spreads, Movepool additions and possible Ability changes.

There should be a seperate thread for all discussions, otherwise we end up with CAP 3 part 2: Typing syndrome.

EaP X: Art thread
Open the art thread now. Submissions are taken for art of the evo, based on Typing and pre-existing game art.

For drawing, i hope (jk)

EaP X: Part 4a: Base stat Discussion
Continue discussing the Base stats, Movepool adjustments and Ability changes needed to bring that Pokemon into the light of day.
Base Stat spreads should be submitted here.

Again, seperate threads for discussion.

EaP X: Part 4b: Base stat spread poll
5-8 options submitted by chosen individuals or ones that lots of people in the last thread liked. (Thread Poll)
If the result is close do a Part 4c with the top 2-3 options.
Movepools should be submitted here.

no submissions per se =\

EaP X: Part 5a: Art poll
The most popular art submissions from the art thread are polled. (Thread poll)
Add in a Part 5b if the results are close.

yup.

EaP X: Sprite Thread: Open this now; sprite submissions for the official art are taken.

I think it's too soon, but bleh.

EaP X: Part 6a: Movepool Poll
Vote on movepools; put the most popular 3 from the last threads on the poll. (Thread Poll)
If there are disagreements about a few particular moves poll them (by bold text voting) in a Part 6b.
Discuss Ability changes.

Again, everything in seperate threads. Really eric =p

EaP X: Part 7: Ability Poll
The most popular ability changes from the previous polls, one option should be leaving them as they are. (Thread poll)
Add in a Part 7b if it's close.

Good.

EaP X: Part 8: Sprite Poll
Sprite submissions are voted on. (Thread poll)

Good.

EaP X: Part 8: Finishing Touches
Discuss and vote on (by bold text) the final details like height and weight.

Good.

Return to Part 1

Polls should be added if the results of any vote are close, they should be subtracted only if there is a VERY clear winner in the previous thread.


Has any Pokemon ever changed egg groups when evolving? Also adding egg moves to existing Pokemon is kinda against the CaP idea, though it could be done.
It is, but like you said it could be done for balance issues. I'm not sure about evolving and changing egg groups, but i know that it makes sense for some things (Shroomish plant, Breloom Plant/humanshape IMO)

New overhall of the hypothetical EAP:

EAP X Prelude: Team leader discussion.

Team leaders candidates put forward their reasoning why they should be picked for TL. Senior/Involved/Well known members within the CAP Minicommunity will only be voting on this poll. More of a discussion of the TL, Candidates are encouraged to put foward notions to the other candidates, which are also encouraged to rebut.

EAP X Part 1: Typing vote

Out of the 17 typings that make up Pokemon, you make a Bold vote on which typing you support. Reasoning is not required, however it would be worth your while to make it so a to draw other people to your "Cause"

2 days, votes are not counted after 48 hours of the first post.

EAP X Part 2: Pokemon vote

The typing that won the previous part will be drawn up, and every member of that typing from (BL?) UU Down will be drawn up. Bold vote, reasoning not quite neccecary, but up to TL's discression.

2 days, votes are not counted after 48 hours of the first post.

EAP X Part 2a: Overflow voting

Overflow poll from part 2 if required.

1-2 days, votes are not counted after 24-48 hours of the first post. ( as required)

EAP X Part 3: Typing poll

Bold vote, pick the secondary typing of the pokemon that needs to be evolved. Reasoning is essential, and this stops the "me wantz pikablu lolol" Shit. Reasoning is decided at the TL's discression, but may be overruled if the voter can convince the TL otherwise.
2 days, votes are not counted after 48 hours of the first post.

EAP X Part 4: Discussion of Movepool, Ability, Base stats

Movepool, Ability and Base stats are discussed as to what will be needed to make the pokemon OU Worthy and useable. Absolute reasoning will be needed behind any submission, and you will need to draw up somthing along the lines of:
Base stat spread:

BST:

Movepool(Attacking):

Movepool:(Defending):
Movepool(Support):

Ability:

This will be run at the same time as

EAP X Part 5: Art submissions

This thread takes art submissions, and both part 4 and 5 work off eachother. They are posted at the same time, and have a time limit of

7 days, votes are not counted after 168 hours of the first post.

EAP X Part 6: Art poll

Everything submitted in part 5 is taken and polled here in a thread poll. Reasoning would be good, but not required (Public poll, thread poll)

2 days, votes are not counted after 48 hours of the first post.

EAP X Part 7: Ability, BST and Movepool.

Based on the official art, the most popular Submissions from part 4 are drawn up and voted on. (Public poll, Thread poll)

5 days, votes are not counted after 120 hours of the first post.

EAP X Part 7a: Small changes

Once we have a template to work with, small changes can be made. Things are brought up in this part

2 days.

EAP X Part 7b: Small Changes

And Voted in this one. (Public Poll, thread poll)

2 days, votes are not counted after 48 hours of the first post.

EAP X Part 8: Sprite submissions

Sprite submissions are taken in this part.

7 days, votes are not counted after 168 hours of the first post.

EAP X Part 9: Sprite Poll

Sprites are voted on. (Thread poll, public poll)

2 days, votes are not counted after 48 hours of the first post.

EAP X Part 10: Finishing touches

Dex entries are discussed based on Movepool and art; Weight and Height also discussed

EAP X Part 10a: Dex + H/W Polls (Bold vote, reasoning essential)

Bold vote of part 10.

EAP X Part 11: Finishing thoughts and closure.

What it says in the title.

What do people think?
 
Everything posted will need reasoning behind it, except for the first typing poll. you may post reasoning for that, but it's not required. From then in, any votes without sufficiant reasoning (In the TL's opinion) Will NOT Be counted.
I don't agree with this. Reasoning should only be required for submissions, not general votes. Submissions need reasoning to support why they should be included. A vote is just someone's opinion on something, and opinions shouldn't need reasoning, in a sense. That gives too much power to the TL, and can let him/her dictate whether someone's vote should count or not. That's not fair in the slightest.

Yes, but we really should pick a typing first, otherwise we end up with every single pokemon in UU/NU with 1 vote =s
Agreed on every level. Only the main type is needed, since at that point it drops the Pokemon count to an average of 20 or so, and from there reasoning can dictate who can be voted on.

EAP X Part 1: Typing vote

3 days, votes are not counted after 72 hours of the first post.
Should be 2 days, like CaP. Not too much happens on the third day to make it worth extending the time that long.

EAP X Part 2: Pokemon vote

The typing that won the previous part will be drawn up, and every member of that typing from (BL?) UU Down will be drawn up. Bold vote, reasoning not quite neccecary, but up to TL's discression.

3 days, votes are not counted after 72 hours of the first post.
I'd say BL and under.

I believe this should start as a one or two day discussion first, with people submitting reasons why a Pokemon should evolve. If people can't support, with reasons, why a Pokemon should evolve and why/how it would improve it's usage, then it shouldn't make it to the poll.

Then after this point, there would be a two day poll on all Pokemon with worthwhile reasoning. It didn't have to be amazing reasoning, but the TL would post the reasons in the opening post for voters to read and decide on what the best choice is.

EAP X Part 3: Typing poll

Bold vote, pick the secondary typing of the pokemon that needs to be evolved. Reasoning is essential, and this stops the "me wantz pikablu lolol" Shit. Reasoning is decided at the TL's discression, but may be overruled if the voter can convince the TL otherwise.

3 days, votes are not counted after 72 hours of the first post.
Back to the first point, whether a vote should count or not is not up to the TL. This should just be handled like the Pokemon selection. 2 days of reasons why types would help the Pokemon (see: Cooper's Electric/Grass write-up, though not necessarily as extensive, it's a good guide). Then 2 days of voting afterwards.

EAP X Part 4: Discussion of Movepool, Ability, Base stats

Movepool, Ability and Base stats are discussed as to what will be needed to make the pokemon OU Worthy and useable. Absolute reasoning will be needed behind any submission, and you will need to draw up somthing along the lines of:
Base stat spread:

BST:

Movepool(Attacking):

Movepool:(Defending):
Movepool(Support):

Ability:

This will be run at the same time as
These really shouldn't be done like this. It should be done the exact same as the CaP in terms of schedule. In fact, here's how I'd do it:

EaP / CaPE:
Phase I: 8 Days + Spillover
  • Main Type (2 Days)
  • Pokemon to Evolve Submissions w/ Reasoning (2 Days)
  • Secondary Type (if any) Discussion w/ Reasoning (End when Poll starts)
  • Pokemon to Evolve Poll (2 Days)
  • Secondary Type (if any) Poll (2 Days)
Phase II: 12 Days + Spillover
  • Begin Art Submission Thread
  • Base Stat Spread Submissions w/ Reasoning (1 Day)
  • Base Stat Spread Poll (1 Day)
  • Ability Alteration Discussion Thread w/ Reasoning (1 Day)
  • Ability Alternation Poll (if any) (1 Day)
  • Movepool Alternation Discussion w/ Reasoning (2 Days)
  • Art Selection Poll (2 Days)
  • Continued, Post Art Movepool Alternation Discussion w/ Reasoning (1 Day)
  • Movepool Alternation Specifics Poll (1 Day)
  • Begin Sprite Submission Thread
  • Name Submission Thread (1 Day)
  • Name Poll (1 Day)
Phase III: 2 Days + Spillover
  • Begin Pokedex Entry Submission Thread
  • Begin Analysis Thread
  • Sprite Poll Thread & Pokedex Poll Thread (2 Day Total, simultaneous threads)
  • Complete
Average time of project, not counting spillovers: 22 Days.
 
I don't agree with this. Reasoning should only be required for submissions, not general votes. Submissions need reasoning to support why they should be included. A vote is just someone's opinion on something, and opinions shouldn't need reasoning, in a sense. That gives too much power to the TL, and can let him/her dictate whether someone's vote should count or not. That's not fair in the slightest.

For the first part reasoning is essential, otherwise we end up with "PIKABLU PPLZPLZPLZPLZ" And the noobs make us make a pikachu evo. For the first part(s), Reasoning is essential.

Agreed on every level. Only the main type is needed, since at that point it drops the Pokemon count to an average of 20 or so, and from there reasoning can dictate who can be voted on.

Yup, main type.

Should be 2 days, like CaP. Not too much happens on the third day to make it worth extending the time that long.

I'll change that, thought the average WAS 3 days.

I'd say BL and under.

Mmk.

I believe this should start as a one or two day discussion first, with people submitting reasons why a Pokemon should evolve. If people can't support, with reasons, why a Pokemon should evolve and why/how it would improve it's usage, then it shouldn't make it to the poll.

Good point; i'll take that in.

Then after this point, there would be a two day poll on all Pokemon with worthwhile reasoning. It didn't have to be amazing reasoning, but the TL would post the reasons in the opening post for voters to read and decide on what the best choice is.

Exactly, there needs to be some reasoning, otherwise we get the Pikablu syndrome.

Back to the first point, whether a vote should count or not is not up to the TL. This should just be handled like the Pokemon selection. 2 days of reasons why types would help the Pokemon (see: Cooper's Electric/Grass write-up, though not necessarily as extensive, it's a good guide). Then 2 days of voting afterwards.

Then we need some guidelines with regards to how much reasoning is needed.

These really shouldn't be done like this. It should be done the exact same as the CaP in terms of schedule. In fact, here's how I'd do it:

EaP / CaPE:
Phase I: 8 Days + Spillover
  • Main Type (2 Days)
  • Pokemon to Evolve Submissions w/ Reasoning (2 Days)
  • Secondary Type (if any) Discussion w/ Reasoning (End when Poll starts)
  • Pokemon to Evolve Poll (2 Days)
  • Secondary Type (if any) Poll (2 Days)
Phase II: 12 Days + Spillover
  • Begin Art Submission Thread
  • Base Stat Spread Submissions w/ Reasoning (1 Day)
  • Base Stat Spread Poll (1 Day)
  • Ability Alteration Discussion Thread w/ Reasoning (1 Day)
  • Ability Alternation Poll (if any) (1 Day)
  • Movepool Alternation Discussion w/ Reasoning (2 Days)
  • Art Selection Poll (2 Days)
  • Continued, Post Art Movepool Alternation Discussion w/ Reasoning (1 Day)
  • Movepool Alternation Specifics Poll (1 Day)
  • Begin Sprite Submission Thread
  • Name Submission Thread (1 Day)
  • Name Poll (1 Day)
Phase III: 2 Days + Spillover
  • Begin Pokedex Entry Submission Thread
  • Begin Analysis Thread
  • Sprite Poll Thread & Pokedex Poll Thread (2 Day Total, simultaneous threads)
  • Complete
Average time of project, not counting spillovers: 22 Days.
Thing is, this isn't the CAP, it's the EAP. It's a reduced version seeing as we've got a guideline to work with. i'll overhaul it again and see what you think of it.
 
For the first part reasoning is essential, otherwise we end up with "PIKABLU PPLZPLZPLZPLZ" And the noobs make us make a pikachu evo. For the first part(s), Reasoning is essential.
Like I said, for submissions reasoning is needed. For voting it's not. Just because people might vote for a Pikachu evo (which I don't see happening, Raichu is perfectly fine IMO) doesn't mean we'll end up with Pikablu. Art, stats, movepool, etc would still be determined.

There's no just cause for telling someone "your vote doesn't count" beyond not following voting rules for things like a bold vote, and not bolding it. Just assume that anyone voting for a Pokemon is voting for the reasons given in the submission thread.

Then we need some guidelines with regards to how much reasoning is needed.
Just something like it's weaknesses, resistances, immunities, what it can accomplish that the former can't, and such. In fact, I'd say to just quote Cooper's write-up and tell people to follow that as an example.

Thing is, this isn't the CAP, it's the EAP. It's a reduced version seeing as we've got a guideline to work with. i'll overhaul it again and see what you think of it.
Maybe not, but we need order, and we cannot throw 3-4 things together at the same time. Remember, this would also go on at the same time as CaP, so you can't have a large number of polls going at once. Just because there's a guideline doesn't mean you don't need to follow the steps in an orderly manner.


Btw, at least post something in the main section of your post or it's hard to use the quote function. Please? =P
 
Yes, but we really should pick a typing first, otherwise we end up with every single pokemon in UU/NU with 1 vote =s
I disagree and think we should use DJD's idea:
Perhaps there could be a Evolution Candidates thread run at the same time TL candidates are being submitted. A selection panel would pick the TL and they could narrow down the list of evo candidates to a list of 10 or so. Then have a poll based on those. In that way, everyone could throw out whatever ideas they want. The panel could see which pokemon have interest and support, and they could prevent stupid stuff.

After the pokemon poll, you could do a typing poll to see what the evo type will be.

This would eliminate the need for choseing the typeing and make it more easy to count.

Again, everything in seperate threads. Really eric =p
You said this or something similer to all the threads that had a discution of the next thread in them, i think it would save time to alow disuctions earlier and it would happen naturaly.
 
I disagree and think we should use DJD's idea:


This would eliminate the need for choseing the typeing and make it more easy to count.


You said this or something similer to all the threads that had a discution of the next thread in them, i think it would save time to alow disuctions earlier and it would happen naturaly.

Thing is, then we end up with the previous CAP part issue and the whole things gets confused.
 
Since when is Base Stat Total a way to talk about a Pokemon's stats? You're saying that a 100/100/100/100/100/10 Pokemon is on the same footing as a 50/45/45/45/45/180 one. I don't get the insistence of using BST in our polls... :(

I did post a thread on how to compare base stats together. Yeah, it was complex, but what do you expect? Pokemon's base stats are complex, so you can't explain them as simply as 'adding them up'.

I'll be honest with you; I'd like to find a better method than that complex one I posted there, and I'll be researching for a better method. But BST is rather pointless if you ask me. :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top