Good work voters.
No more sweeping or getting swept by LO Raikou!
I can actually enjoy UU again, hopefully.
No more sweeping or getting swept by LO Raikou!
I can actually enjoy UU again, hopefully.
Now lets hope that stall doesn't completely dominate.
Except stall never used froslass, that was only offense. Stall used cloyster or omaster. If anything, stall is better now, less offensive teams will run spikes, and raikou is gone, which made decent setup on chansey and gave stall trouble.
Synre said:I think you'd have to basically be functionally retarded not to make the lower reqs - even the account I was using for testing for QC ended up at like 1710 rating or something, 1600 is almost impossible to miss. It might not be such a bad thing since it basically functions as a special exception vote in OU(people who can make enough sense in their paras get to vote in spite of not having particularly impressing ratings/sexp/whatever), but it's definitely not anything resembling an accomplishment to make them.
Of course they know Hitmontop has Foresight, but it's not rare to go with moves like Attack as Hitmontop Foresights then go to Ghost as it spins, which means it can't take 2 consecutive hits to spin and thus is forced out. It ended up though they played in a conservative way and one took advantage of the other because of that; as losing all your hazards against opposing stall is almost signing your death sentence.
True that but switching Froslass into Foresight loses all your entry hazards too. If Hitmontop is already in, it's 50/50 either way - if it spins and you switch in your ghost, you win; if it spins and you don't switch in your ghost, you lose; if it Foresights and you switch in your ghost, you lose; if it Foresights and you don't switch in your ghost, you win. For a 50/50 choice I would've expected more thought, yet both players essentially played instantaneously ...