-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
[Standard] MegaMan Battle Network Mafia - Game over: blue_light and wickdaggler win!
- Thread starter UncleSam
- Start date
Reasons why you should listen to me and lynch the interwebs before macle:
1. Why would I lie about something as risky as this? WWW has nobody left, if the interwebs kills the last, then he completes half his win condition and has about 4 kills left to make. But before WWW dies they're going to hit a SciLab if possible. How many do you have? 6? 7? 8? 3-5 kills drops you within losing range, depending on other neutrals left and how many kills successfully go off in one night. Enjoy??
2. We have a confirmed inspection on him that we've been saving for when it's needed. Now it's needed because both of us are in danger of losing.
And I hate neutrals so I'd rather not see one win. If anyone's looked at BC mafia you'd know I hate neutrals.
3. SciLab has two full inspectors (supermarth64's claim). Yeah ok. No, you don't. A faction like SciLab would not have two inspectors. sm64 is probably another neutral and would thoroughly enjoy getting rid of a "village leader" like macle so he can take over with his inspector claim. Whatever, nice lie.
Maybe if you thought about this you'd realize the likelihood you have two inspectors.
4. We're not going off "a hunch" that someone may or may not have been converted. Not to mention this 'someone' claims one-time kills, both of which according to you guys have been used up. If you knew enough that he'd been converted you must have inspected him so you'd know he only had one-time kills.
Which means you're either going off a bad guess or you're lying somewhere along the line.
Who's the bigger threat here? Some guy with an alliance you're not sure of but who has no night abilities left, or a neutral with a bunch of kills saved up he can use on one night?
think about it :B unless it's too much of a strain to question your leaders and follow someone who doesn't want to lose to a gd neutral.
tl;dr i hate neutrals make this pos lose. then do whatever w/ your noob scilab.
you can lynch macle the next day, when you still have majority. since you're confident he's a badman. but maybe you should get rid of this punk today before you lose ?_?
like if it were me, i'd rather eliminate some guy who has 3+ kills stored up before some guy who should have none, then go back for the other.
but if you guys are too dumb well that's not going to be my loss.
your beloved rey should have told you the interwebs had a bpv anyways, confirming my story p much.
edit: here's an idea, why not lynch me if i'm "confirmed bad?" supermarth64 is targeting macle to ensure he has control of scilab with his obviously-fake claim of second inspector instead of targeting extremely-dangerous neutral about to smack you lemmings up.
for scilab playing such a 'safe lynch game' till this point you're surely taking a risk here not following a confirmed inspect on a dangerous neutral.
i will lose 100% if the interwebs stays alive. i need your help to lynch him and then you can go back to lynching the dying WWW and whoever you suspect of being WWW and whoever you just generally don't like.
but if you want to take the risk that you'll lose with a neutral alive instead of someone who you should know the alliance of and you should know the dead weight of....... you can join me in loserville
1. Why would I lie about something as risky as this? WWW has nobody left, if the interwebs kills the last, then he completes half his win condition and has about 4 kills left to make. But before WWW dies they're going to hit a SciLab if possible. How many do you have? 6? 7? 8? 3-5 kills drops you within losing range, depending on other neutrals left and how many kills successfully go off in one night. Enjoy??
2. We have a confirmed inspection on him that we've been saving for when it's needed. Now it's needed because both of us are in danger of losing.
And I hate neutrals so I'd rather not see one win. If anyone's looked at BC mafia you'd know I hate neutrals.
3. SciLab has two full inspectors (supermarth64's claim). Yeah ok. No, you don't. A faction like SciLab would not have two inspectors. sm64 is probably another neutral and would thoroughly enjoy getting rid of a "village leader" like macle so he can take over with his inspector claim. Whatever, nice lie.
Maybe if you thought about this you'd realize the likelihood you have two inspectors.
4. We're not going off "a hunch" that someone may or may not have been converted. Not to mention this 'someone' claims one-time kills, both of which according to you guys have been used up. If you knew enough that he'd been converted you must have inspected him so you'd know he only had one-time kills.
Which means you're either going off a bad guess or you're lying somewhere along the line.
Who's the bigger threat here? Some guy with an alliance you're not sure of but who has no night abilities left, or a neutral with a bunch of kills saved up he can use on one night?
think about it :B unless it's too much of a strain to question your leaders and follow someone who doesn't want to lose to a gd neutral.
tl;dr i hate neutrals make this pos lose. then do whatever w/ your noob scilab.
you can lynch macle the next day, when you still have majority. since you're confident he's a badman. but maybe you should get rid of this punk today before you lose ?_?
like if it were me, i'd rather eliminate some guy who has 3+ kills stored up before some guy who should have none, then go back for the other.
but if you guys are too dumb well that's not going to be my loss.
your beloved rey should have told you the interwebs had a bpv anyways, confirming my story p much.
edit: here's an idea, why not lynch me if i'm "confirmed bad?" supermarth64 is targeting macle to ensure he has control of scilab with his obviously-fake claim of second inspector instead of targeting extremely-dangerous neutral about to smack you lemmings up.
for scilab playing such a 'safe lynch game' till this point you're surely taking a risk here not following a confirmed inspect on a dangerous neutral.
i will lose 100% if the interwebs stays alive. i need your help to lynch him and then you can go back to lynching the dying WWW and whoever you suspect of being WWW and whoever you just generally don't like.
but if you want to take the risk that you'll lose with a neutral alive instead of someone who you should know the alliance of and you should know the dead weight of....... you can join me in loserville
Just something I want to point out - what kill was Macle's Human-killing one? I don't see anything about any players getting arrested.
wickdaggler.
darkanine posed as a www w/ 0 vote, a kill, and a bpv. we let him since he killed who we asked. he was targeted by macle n1 or n2 breaking the bpv then we were redirected to him.
which he (darkanine) told me. so if his role is right, macle has 0 kills. which makes lynching him with the interwehs badman neutral running around stupid. it's not like you'll have your numbers halved lynching the interwebs first.
ps to anyone thinking i posted only to save macle, look at the post times. i didn't know suspicious second inspector sm64's aims to lead at the time, i simply want a neutral who ensures my loss gone.
you know i'm wondering how that worked if he was a navi only, but the flavor was accurate for macle. so one of macle's kills was used there, meaning he couldn't have killed rodan who was almost assuredly jacked in orhis nonnavi kill broke darkanine's bpv.
darkanine posed as a www w/ 0 vote, a kill, and a bpv. we let him since he killed who we asked. he was targeted by macle n1 or n2 breaking the bpv then we were redirected to him.
which he (darkanine) told me. so if his role is right, macle has 0 kills. which makes lynching him with the interwehs badman neutral running around stupid. it's not like you'll have your numbers halved lynching the interwebs first.
ps to anyone thinking i posted only to save macle, look at the post times. i didn't know suspicious second inspector sm64's aims to lead at the time, i simply want a neutral who ensures my loss gone.
you know i'm wondering how that worked if he was a navi only, but the flavor was accurate for macle. so one of macle's kills was used there, meaning he couldn't have killed rodan who was almost assuredly jacked in orhis nonnavi kill broke darkanine's bpv.
Yeti is right. Why lynch someone who might belong to either faction and might have kills remaining based off the speculation of someone not entirely clean, when we can lynch a confirmed neutral - bad to all - with more kills remaining than people in WWW?
lynch the interwebs
lynch the interwebs
vote macle
whoops
Protoman could've activated wickdaggler's bpv as well, as there was indication of Protoman fighting Bass and failing during that update (however it had no effect, indicating a bpv). Also, macle's human kill couldn't have worked on wickdaggler because Bass is a Navi, not a Human.
Meh, I'm not really sure who to go for here. If interwebs is indeed wolf then He will most likely go after scilab since he will count on the village to lynch WWW. If he eliminates WWW through kills he would have to fight the village by himself which is not possible. Then again interwebs could be a moron.
For now lynch interwebs
For now lynch interwebs
Protoman was killed by wickdaggler. wickdaggler's BPV was broken the night before and the flavor from it was in line with macle's role PM.
Which means, macle didn't kill Rodan and you're lynching someone unable to defend themself because they're on vacation, and you're also lynching the last 'village leader' who originally claimed.
ps hey moron scilab this still has never occured to you:
you
are
not
a
village
you should be more preoccupied with a lone neutral in a game of bigfaction1 vs bigfaction2, because, as I've posted, they're going to have a lot of power to win the game solo.
"lol" it wouldn't surprise me if rey is going around PMing everyone to vote macle regardless of confirmed neutral scum the interwebs since macle isn't here to defend himself. way to deadtalk to win!!
you are going off a hunch instead of confirmed strongman Yeti or confirmed neutral scum the interwebs.
you are going for someone you suspect of being converted but you don't have a way to verify their kills being used up, when I have said macle used his Navi kill on wickdaggler to break the BPV. Lynch macle the next day, but get rid of the interwebs before he makes us all lose.
Not to mention you claimed second inspector, supermarth. Sounds more like you're trying to screw up SciLab than anything else.
damp scilab.
ITT: Yeti confirms what we all had thought for a long time, hes actually male.
you could just not vote until you have a chance to get informed.
or you could be the typical idiot scilab with no mind of their own blindly following whoever claims to be a leader no matter how much suspicion there is and disregarding the fact they never prove their claims (until they die!!)
edit: you know i'm starting to agree with reyscarface that scilab is too stupid to have anyone else lead (not like i don't think he was a terrible leader) but really.
nobody is questioning the claim they have two full inspectors, once of which is trying to lynch a claimed scilab leader while he's away and can't defend himself on circumstantial evidence that has been proven to be not true???
really scilab?
are you this stupid??
even if www loses at least we weren't as clueless and damp as you.
unless someone PMed you all from the grave telling you to do this, I really can't fathom why anyone who wasn't on the 'in circle' and even those who were would trust supermarth64 to lynch a scilab leader when what sm has accused macle of has been shown false.
lynch the interwebs the dangerous neutral gd do you guys want to lose??
you deserve to lose for playing like a village in a 2 mafia 1 village game when you're a mafia and WWW is a mafia and you have dangerous neutrals on the loose. terrible.
or you could be the typical idiot scilab with no mind of their own blindly following whoever claims to be a leader no matter how much suspicion there is and disregarding the fact they never prove their claims (until they die!!)
edit: you know i'm starting to agree with reyscarface that scilab is too stupid to have anyone else lead (not like i don't think he was a terrible leader) but really.
nobody is questioning the claim they have two full inspectors, once of which is trying to lynch a claimed scilab leader while he's away and can't defend himself on circumstantial evidence that has been proven to be not true???
really scilab?
are you this stupid??
even if www loses at least we weren't as clueless and damp as you.
unless someone PMed you all from the grave telling you to do this, I really can't fathom why anyone who wasn't on the 'in circle' and even those who were would trust supermarth64 to lynch a scilab leader when what sm has accused macle of has been shown false.
lynch the interwebs the dangerous neutral gd do you guys want to lose??
you deserve to lose for playing like a village in a 2 mafia 1 village game when you're a mafia and WWW is a mafia and you have dangerous neutrals on the loose. terrible.
i don't know anything about that spreadsheet but everyone seems to be voting for mac so yeahUncleSam said:
EDIT:
having thought about it a bit, i now believe that Yeti himself/herself is larkman and thus should be killed
think about it, he/she could have inspected me, noticed i am possibly quite dangerous to him/her and then decided to claim i am larkman to get me killed without losing a kill!
um... except Larkman isn't a member of the WWW?
Two things wrong with your story: SciLab's vigilante was killed. There is no way you guys would have TWO, plus macle's kills since he is SciLab.
Also every kill flavor is "effectively killing them", which you lack.
Not to mention where have your kills been? You haven't been killing anyone which I find very suspicious.
You can't, because you have to charge up your kills by letting 4 members of a faction die first.
You have a BPV. We know because we hit it and you're still here. I can c/p the text from UncleSam when we hit it.
Look at the PM:
as SearchMan, every night, you may PM UncleSm and BillyMills with "night X- Sniping <user>" You will aim and fire your arm mounted sniper rifle at <user>, killing them.
There's no capital 'As', UncleSm is missing the a, billymills' name isn't capitalized in any PM, 'Night' is always capitalized, there's no space between the '-', and there should be a period after <user>".
nice fake.
If you SciLab pawns can't look at this and say "what an obvious fake" and realize I am telling you the truth and he is a dangerous neutral, well, I give up. There's no way I can win if you guys are that clueless and stupid.
Are you really going to take the chance with macle, who as I've said used his jacked-in kill on wickdaggler and couldn't have killed Rodan., when his lynch is being lead by a "second full inspector"?
You guys didn't have a second BG, why would you have a second inspector? You don't have a second hooker, why would you have a second inspector?
You certainly wouldn't have a second vigilante who could potentially kill the same times as the dead Protoman. 2 kills in one night by the larger faction? no.
Nor would you have a second mayor when you have more votes to begin with.
scilab look at this evidence and lynch the interwebs.
there is literally no way what I'm saying can be proven wrong atm. unless you are too damp to consider the logistics.
Two things wrong with your story: SciLab's vigilante was killed. There is no way you guys would have TWO, plus macle's kills since he is SciLab.
Also every kill flavor is "effectively killing them", which you lack.
Not to mention where have your kills been? You haven't been killing anyone which I find very suspicious.
You can't, because you have to charge up your kills by letting 4 members of a faction die first.
You have a BPV. We know because we hit it and you're still here. I can c/p the text from UncleSam when we hit it.
Look at the PM:
as SearchMan, every night, you may PM UncleSm and BillyMills with "night X- Sniping <user>" You will aim and fire your arm mounted sniper rifle at <user>, killing them.
There's no capital 'As', UncleSm is missing the a, billymills' name isn't capitalized in any PM, 'Night' is always capitalized, there's no space between the '-', and there should be a period after <user>".
nice fake.
If you SciLab pawns can't look at this and say "what an obvious fake" and realize I am telling you the truth and he is a dangerous neutral, well, I give up. There's no way I can win if you guys are that clueless and stupid.
Are you really going to take the chance with macle, who as I've said used his jacked-in kill on wickdaggler and couldn't have killed Rodan., when his lynch is being lead by a "second full inspector"?
You guys didn't have a second BG, why would you have a second inspector? You don't have a second hooker, why would you have a second inspector?
You certainly wouldn't have a second vigilante who could potentially kill the same times as the dead Protoman. 2 kills in one night by the larger faction? no.
Nor would you have a second mayor when you have more votes to begin with.
scilab look at this evidence and lynch the interwebs.
there is literally no way what I'm saying can be proven wrong atm. unless you are too damp to consider the logistics.
A point on this:
1. DO NOT take flavor in the updates as an accurate depiction of who-killed-who. The only flavor it is safe to take as proof is the final flavor of how someone is killed on the official player's list.
Please don't take anything I say as proof of anything, unless I post a rule or something.
Majority. Update coming in an edit.
...
You all gather around macle and decide to kill him, but suddenly, he began acting very strangely...differently than anyone else would have expected, anyhow. He seemed himself yet also...bug-like. Suddenly, he jumped up 20 feet in the air, and began bounding off into the distance. Did someone else REALLY think they could escape the mob...anyhow, in the distance, macle suddenly fell over and breathed his last. When you caught up with him, it seems as if someone sprayed him with bugspray. Weird...Speaking of weird, you found a whole bunch of slips of paper next to him...
Well, that was surprising, to say the least....anyway, time to go into your rabbit holes and pray you aren't a victim of scary monsters this night...
It is now Night 6. Night 6 will end when I have all night actions, or in 48 hours from this post, at 11:00 GMT-5 on Thursday, May 3rd. Please try tog et your actions in though, there really aren't that many more of you.
...
You all gather around macle and decide to kill him, but suddenly, he began acting very strangely...differently than anyone else would have expected, anyhow. He seemed himself yet also...bug-like. Suddenly, he jumped up 20 feet in the air, and began bounding off into the distance. Did someone else REALLY think they could escape the mob...anyhow, in the distance, macle suddenly fell over and breathed his last. When you caught up with him, it seems as if someone sprayed him with bugspray. Weird...Speaking of weird, you found a whole bunch of slips of paper next to him...
UncleSam said:
UncleSam said:
UncleSam said:
Well, that was surprising, to say the least....anyway, time to go into your rabbit holes and pray you aren't a victim of scary monsters this night...
It is now Night 6. Night 6 will end when I have all night actions, or in 48 hours from this post, at 11:00 GMT-5 on Thursday, May 3rd. Please try tog et your actions in though, there really aren't that many more of you.