Pokemon Black & White, aka Gen 5. Coming to Japan in Fall 2010.

Status
Not open for further replies.
What do you mean there are no pure Ice type?? Glaceon and Regice would like a word with you.

I think the user meant before generation III...hope so :P

Simple solution on a pure flying: don't give it Roost. Trust me, if GameFreak wanted a pure flying, they would make a pure flying. And logically, a pure flying with no other affinity (even normal) is therefore ALWAYS flying and so cannot roost.
 
they dont need to add roost but i really think it would be weird for a pure flying type pokemon to not get roost, gyara and mantyke are special cases since they main type is water, plus they design make sense they dont learn roost.
There designs don't make sense? I'd love to hear why Beedrill, Veonmoth, Mew, Dunsparce, Volbeat/Illumise, Flygon, and Lati@s do make sense to learn Roost considering none of them are flying types. Hell, there are several pokes that are part flying that make no sense considering roosting is a bird thing, not an everything-with-wings thing.

Considering a pure flying type would be something like a cloud or Lakitu, not having roost makes perfect sense.
 
That unnamed gothic lolita pokemon...



11632279.jpg


She is ADORABLE. I'm hoping she becomes a Dark/Psychic type with an excellent BST and movepool... :heart::heart::heart:

with nasty plot and 120 spe hopefully (L)

The thing is with pure flying, the previous birds (pidgey ect.) are about as pure flying in appearance as you can get. How would you make a bird more bird like but less normal and not stray into terretory of fire/dark ect.

This crocodile could be pretty awesome. Dark/ground grants amazing coverage. Give him swords dance and 100 spe or something and we've got ourselves a new garchomp but less broken.

And I did some calculations on the water starter pokemon with the information gained from the video (he didn't die from the thunderbolt). And even if the attacker only has a spAtk of 60 our new little water friend is likely to have 65/60 defences which could translate to a third evolution with 115/105 defences. This could actually be higher! The defence could be substantialy lower compared to its spDef but I think this guy is going to be amazing. I'm predicting 115 HP / 60 Atk / 100 Def / 90 SpAtk / 105 SpDef / 70 Spe. Quote me on this in a couple months time.

I can't deduct anything else from the other battle images.
 
Imagine a pure Flying type. Imagine it uses Roost
Now what happens? It has no weaknesses or resistances for the rest of the turn
Is that a problem? I don't see how it would be
Stop the bitching
 
with nasty plot and 120 spe hopefully (L)

The thing is with pure flying, the previous birds (pidgey ect.) are about as pure flying in appearance as you can get. How would you make a bird more bird like but less normal and not stray into terretory of fire/dark ect.

This crocodile could be pretty awesome. Dark/ground grants amazing coverage. Give him swords dance and 100 spe or something and we've got ourselves a new garchomp but less broken.

And I did some calculations on the water starter pokemon with the information gained from the video (he didn't die from the thunderbolt). And even if the attacker only has a spAtk of 60 our new little water friend is likely to have 65/60 defences which could translate to a third evolution with 115/105 defences. This could actually be higher! The defence could be substantialy lower compared to its spDef but I think this guy is going to be amazing. I'm predicting 115 HP / 60 Atk / 100 Def / 90 SpAtk / 105 SpDef / 70 Spe. Quote me on this in a couple months time.

I can't deduct anything else from the other battle images.

First where the hell are you getting these numbers for the third evolution? Second I pray to god your wrong for 2 reasons one I don't want another bulky water and to I want to smash faces with otterai's shell blade to avenge his early hatred

Could I get a link to the video
 
Just commenting a bit. The Roost discussion is utterly pointless. OF COURSE, GF could make a pure flying type if they wanted. Roost is just a strong pointer that they, too, think of Flying as a "secondary typing" and thus do not want to make a pure flying type.

Also...
Mario With Lasers said:
Fire-types would be useless against Ho-oh, at best you'd see a spike in Heatran usage (unless you want to try to wall Ho-oh with lol Ninetales). And the current OU Grass-types are at 18th, 24th and 44th, while the two Ice-types we have are at 36th and 40th. It's not because "someone wanted it like this", but because... they're more used than the Ice-types. I mean, were the threshold higher, there would not even be any Ice-types in OU, just to show how poorly they are used.
Did you seriously not think of Ho-oh being somewhere in the Top 5 in OU? Wtf? OF COURSE, nobody wants to wall Ho-oh with Fire types, but everybody wants to USE HO-OH. And considered that we have 2 Fire types right nowin OU, adding a third one that is surely going HIGH in usage is a dramatic increase of Fire types.
And as I mentioned before...*sigh*
18 is just the strange effect of the move spore (but yeah, ok),
44 I forgot (but whatever, I mean 44!?)
and 24 is just even allowed to exist there because "somebody wanted this", this somebody being whoever the fuck arranged Smogon tiers.
I'm not arguing that Celebi should be banned (although I'm really in favor of Nintendo's banlist), but just that it is a good example: The Grass type seems to be actually so bad that a pokemon designed as a uber becomes no real problem to OU when it has the Grass type. See?
You cannot say, "Oh, there's Celebi, Grass isn't weak!" because the only reason there is Celebi in the first place, is because Grass is weak.

Efemera said:
Really now? The "obvious banlist" isn't well-designed. Jirachi gets banned because it's an event Pokemon and Garchomp is allowed. You really think an arbitrary banlist by Nintendo beats one tested by thousands of people battling all the time?

The tiers below OU exist for organization purposes, and so that you can play competitively with weaker Pokemon. How is that bad?

Anyway, Grass is a much better type than Ice. It resists both Water and Ground, the two most commonly used offensive types in the game, as well as Electric (and itself). Grass is mostly hampered by the fact that both Dragon and Steel resist it. Down in UU, Grass is very powerful offensively. Ice is just a terrible type. Most Water types learn Ice Beam, and Ice STAB isn't usually worth the huge number of weaknesses that come with Ice.
There are multiple things wrong with the first paragraph. I'm trying not to get into theory too much...
1. The "obvious banlist" does not need to be well-designed by anybody's means. The metagame adjusts. Imagine, you could even play pokemon when Garchomp was still allowed. It was an arbitrary decision that Smogon did not want a metagame centralized around Garchomp. People tend to think that this is natural, but you have to realize that Smogon nonetheless wanted the metagame to be centralized around Stealth Rocks and Scizor ('s Bullet Punch). Former metagames had that, too. GSC was almost completely centralizede around Blissey and Curse. It is an more or less arbitrary decision not to play a metagame centralized around garchomp. And as such not even less arbitrary than what Nintendo calls Uber.
2. The banlist isn't tested by shit. As I've said, you can play any game of pokemon in some way. It's not a great achievement that a metagame develops. Smogon uses a really poor method to decide on its bans (banning pokemon one-by-one, not re-testing everything once something changes, etc...) I know, they cannot do much better having only as many people as they have. But nobody should say they're doing better than they possibly could be doing. lol

I agree with you, that on paper it has some good defensive matchups. BUt if you look at it, there is no standard pokemon to make use of this (we had to invite celebi from ubers). Venusaur is the first defensive Grass type in OU (besides Celebi) and lurks at 77. It's somehow not working for Grass. (The reason you've given is IMO right, too. Perhaps we finally get a Grass/Steel?)

Tortferngatr said:
Because a bunch of people wanted to use Celebi but not Abomasnow. Not because ""somebody wanted them there." Celebi may also have seven weaknesses, but it has much better stats, complements Heatran perfectly, has a better movepool, and it's versatile. And it's fast. Abomasnow does not have good stats, it does not complement another OU perfectly, it tends to have a poorer, outclassed movepool, and it is not versatile. To top this all off...outside of Ice Shard (Weavile and Mamo pull this off better anyway,) it is slow. Hail is the only thing he's got.
Please see above... I'm not talkign about why Celebi isn't UU but about why Celebi isn't Uber. And that's because "some people" decided it should not be. And that's because it wasn't too strong for OU. And that's because the Grass type sucks.

@ UltiMario (below)
Doesn't affect my point. Of course, no type is so bad that you cannot make one of its pokemon uber.
 
Please see above... I'm not talkign about why Celebi isn't UU but about why Celebi isn't Uber. And that's because "some people" decided it should not be. And that's because it wasn't too strong for OU. And that's because the Grass type sucks.
Shaymin-S is Grass Type but it's Uber.
 
Corrupted I was thinking about your stats and maybe he can still be offensive with with that specail bulk. If he is a fighting type like many of us hope he would fit right in as many fighting types have a large Specail defense stat. He would be different with a large hp stat. So I was thinking something like 110 HP/ 100 Atk / 60 def / 70 SAtk/ 105 SpDef / 90 Spe. That gives him 530 which is around where the staters BST are.
 
And I did some calculations on the water starter pokemon with the information gained from the video (he didn't die from the thunderbolt). And even if the attacker only has a spAtk of 60 our new little water friend is likely to have 65/60 defences which could translate to a third evolution with 115/105 defences. This could actually be higher! The defence could be substantialy lower compared to its spDef but I think this guy is going to be amazing. I'm predicting 115 HP / 60 Atk / 100 Def / 90 SpAtk / 105 SpDef / 70 Spe. Quote me on this in a couple months time.

I can't deduct anything else from the other battle images.
Actually, That attack is Wild Bolt. Its the new signature attack of Shimama. Its been reported as its move, and In the video you can hear them say Wild Bolt. So We have no idea its power, and we don't even know if its physical or special. And my guess is physical.
 
Actually, That attack is Wild Bolt. Its the new signature attack of Shimama. Its been reported as its move, and In the video you can hear them say Wild Bolt. So We have no idea its power, and we don't even know if its physical or special. And my guess is special.


In that case forget the stats that I came up with and still hoping for Physical offensive Water Fighting otterai
 
In that case forget the stats that I came up with and still hoping for Physical offensive Water Fighting otterai

Although I have to say, I was surprised when Mijumaru didn't die from Wild Bolt. So either, Mijumaru is really defensive, Shimama is really weak, or Shimama is of average strength and Wild Bolt is Weak.
 
to many possibilties but his HP is stat is going to be somewhere around 50ish which is about as much as mudkip

I just watched the video he only lived with 11 hp it could have been a matter damage role and the iv and ev differences.
 
Imagine a pure Flying type. Imagine it uses Roost
Now what happens? It has no weaknesses or resistances for the rest of the turn
Is that a problem? I don't see how it would be
Stop the bitching

This.

@sandstreamer: you're obviously a total moron. Every gen 4 suspect was tested meticulously, multiple times, and their final tiering was decided by democratic vote in all cases. And Celebi wasn't "made to be uber" at all. If it had been, it would have 680 BST. The only reason it's banned in official Nintendo tournaments is because it's event-only, so not everyone would have access to it. By your reasoning, Steel is a terrible type because Jirachi is OU.
 
2. The banlist isn't tested by shit. As I've said, you can play any game of pokemon in some way. It's not a great achievement that a metagame develops. Smogon uses a really poor method to decide on its bans (banning pokemon one-by-one, not re-testing everything once something changes, etc...) I know, they cannot do much better having only as many people as they have. But nobody should say they're doing better than they possibly could be doing. lol

Just posting to say this guy has no clue wtf he is talking about. Stage 3 definately wasn't testing things "one-by-one." Things were also retested, hence why Latias was later banned. I suppose you are right about the first part of this statement though, the banlist isn't being tested by shit, its being tested by the community and its players.
 
Jirachi has the same base stats as Celebi.
Jirachi has a good movepool.
Jirachi has a great ability.
Jirachi is only OU.
Steel types suck.


Seriously, what kind of logic is this?
 
Imagine a pure Flying type. Imagine it uses Roost
Now what happens? It has no weaknesses or resistances for the rest of the turn
Is that a problem? I don't see how it would be
Stop the bitching

Been mentioned many times already.
A pure flying type does not have to be a bird, much less learn roost.
 
Let's all please ignore Sandstreamers horrible logic and get back or as close to ontopic as we can get. Also let's please drop this mono flying type as it has probably 200 pages devoted to it where neither side can win we ll have to wait and see.

Sandstreamer if you have a problem with the tiering you can either leave the site, make your own site with your own tiers or just live with it your choice. Either way this is not the place to post it.

Okay so I have been thinking about the poison type and how horrible it is. Until I realized Acid is considered a poison type move. As such I was thinking that steel can be eaten away by acid why can't a or some poison moves be developed that are specailly designed to be super effective against steel. Moves like poison jab and gunk shot would maintain to not affect steel but a move like Corrosive Drop would eat away the steel. That way poison pokemon would be more viable and the type chart would not have to change.
 
Let's all please ignore Sandstreamers horrible logic and get back or as close to ontopic as we can get. Also let's please drop this mono flying type as it has probably 200 pages devoted to it where neither side can win we ll have to wait and see.

Sandstreamer if you have a problem with the tiering you can either leave the site, make your own site with your own tiers or just live with it your choice. Either way this is not the place to post it.

Okay so I have been thinking about the poison type and how horrible it is. Until I realized Acid is considered a poison type move. As such I was thinking that steel can be eaten away by acid why can't a or some poison moves be developed that are specailly designed to be super effective against steel. Moves like poison jab and gunk shot would maintain to not affect steel but a move like Corrosive Drop would eat away the steel. That way poison pokemon would be more viable and the type chart would not have to change.
I don't see that happening, lol.
 
I'm sorry but iI really want to make sure that Sandstreamer never even thinls of those arguments again. Now according to you (Dandstreamer) Celebi is supposed to be uber but the fact that it is a Grass type pulls it down to OU. Now let's take a look at the arguments against that:
Skymin is a grass type, as well as being weak to stealth rock (beside the point) and is an Uber
The only reason Celebi is banned by Nintendo is because it is only event obtainable. Do not try and argue that it is too strong because Dialgan Palkia, Kyogre and so on are allowed.
Finally, by this logic (lol) Jirachi being OU makes the steel typing a bad one.
Now let's take a stroll down memory lane and flashback to Gen III. Not only was Celebi viewed as an Uber by half the community (sort of like Gen IV's Latias) but it was actually considered to be a better pokemon than Jirachi.
So now Sandstreamer, have a long hard think about what I and everyone else has said and kust back down!

p.s The pokemon aren't tested by shit, they are tested by probably the best minds competitive pokemon has to offer.
 
Imagine a pure Flying type. Imagine it uses Roost
Now what happens? It has no weaknesses or resistances for the rest of the turn
Is that a problem? I don't see how it would be
Stop the bitching

This is a good way of saying it's okay to have a pure flying type , but why would you wanna miss on the STAB of Return/Quick Attack etc.?
EDIT: I wanna see moves with multitypes;D
 
Let's all please ignore Sandstreamers horrible logic and get back or as close to ontopic as we can get. Also let's please drop this mono flying type as it has probably 200 pages devoted to it where neither side can win we ll have to wait and see.

Sandstreamer if you have a problem with the tiering you can either leave the site, make your own site with your own tiers or just live with it your choice. Either way this is not the place to post it.

Okay so I have been thinking about the poison type and how horrible it is. Until I realized Acid is considered a poison type move. As such I was thinking that steel can be eaten away by acid why can't a or some poison moves be developed that are specailly designed to be super effective against steel. Moves like poison jab and gunk shot would maintain to not affect steel but a move like Corrosive Drop would eat away the steel. That way poison pokemon would be more viable and the type chart would not have to change.

I always thought something like this as well. I never understood why poison never affected steel because there are obviously some acids that exist that can burn through steel.
 
Poison should have a special supper corrosive acid move that allows poison moves to hit steel for 5 turns. Or maybe an ability for an acidic muk evo with that effect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top