I take it that Cloud Nine isn't a really good counter to the weathers...right?
Yes considering Golduck, Altaria and Lickilicky are the only Pokemon that use it and none of which are commonly used in OU, in fact I haven't even seen it used yet.
I take it that Cloud Nine isn't a really good counter to the weathers...right?
Well kinda because I've seen weather mixed interestingly with the common OUs, but I guess I don't feel too strongly about it either way.you think there is more diversity with weather present than without? =S
Jellicent does not stop Kingdra =S and Politoed itself (not its ability) isn't broken.
Really? I've never had a problem stopping Kingdra with Jellicent, am I missing something here?
Ah, I've never seen that before. Thanks for the info. Most of the time they just try to Dragon Pulse me.
I am reading this thread and I really have to ask one thing:
What exactly is the point of trying to allow Swers back in like this?
Aldron's proposal was made on the grounds that without it, the fear of weather bans cascading would be banned. That's not how I see it. What you are trying to do is no different than these amusing requests to unban Blaze Blazeken. Rain is broken, and it was the Sw/Drizzle ban that kept in check. Now you want to try and undo that, but to such a small degree that this doesn't just turn back to round 2?
No pokemon, strategy, or ability has ever been twisted this much to the desperation from keeping it contained. If you guys are truly happy with your weather wars of gen 5, leave the meta as it is. Rain is doing just fine without the need for a boost, there is no reason to create this pseudo experiment just to see if one abuser might be ok with politoed.
I.E. Either undo the proposal and figure out where you want the ban hammer to strike, or leave it and keep your pseudo balance.
Someone doesn't know that his sample size is way too small o_0
And no, my team wasn't handled rain and sand fairly well, and that was quite a big part of the metagame at the time. I had more problems with sun and especially stall, but having checked rain and sand meant the team was relatively safe against a lot of the metagame.
Still, we are nomming Garchomp (abuser) rather than Tar/Hippo (enablers). If you want to include all the sand abusing users, then okay fine, that's 3. Sand is still manageable.
"Zero users of Swift Swim are allowed on a team that also carries Drizzle Politoed."
"One user of Swift swim is allowed on a team that also carries Drizzle Politoed."
It isn't any more complex (we did a complex ban in the first place and no one has suffered an aneurism as of yet), and it isn't arbitrary, it is literally the first logical step. We can't allow half of a swift swimmer, and it would be illogical to allow 2 without first trying one.
Finally, another one that understands my point.
Why overpower a thing that is just too powerful with another power-up ? (whooo just too "power" words :O).
The only thing to do with weathers is banning them OR restrict them OR leave it just like they are now NOT overpower them.
I don't see the point of saying this, as you're basically saying Pokemon X cannot beat Pokemon Y in Weather Z, while that Pokemon would almost always lose to the other Pokemon regardless (for example, I don't think Heatran can ever beat Vaporeon, whether there is Drizzle or not). What you failed to mention, however, were the Pokemon on the "unfavorable" weather that Pokemon X could beat (you didn't say that Heatran will not be dead weight against Ferrothorn or Scizor, which are both common on Rain teams, for example).
I'm reading through the moninations thread right now, and I think that some of the arguments against thundurus are flawed. Blaziken and garchomp have one main set that is cited as broken, but people are saying that thundurus should be banned because:
It's the fastest poke in OU.
It has 115 / 125 offenses and NP.
It can sweep with tbolt, HP ice and focus blast for perfect coverage.
It can also beat blissey and tyranitar with taunt + hammer arm.
Scarfers and revenge killers are paralyzed by prankster twave.
It has priority taunt.
But not all on the same set. Faster revenge killers deal with it easily sans twave. Blissey can throw it around if it lacks hammer arm, which ends your sweep anyway (-1 speed.)
It's the fastest poke in OU.
It has 115 / 125 offenses and NP.
It can sweep with tbolt, HP ice and focus blast for perfect coverage.
It can also beat blissey and tyranitar with taunt + hammer arm.
Scarfers and revenge killers are paralyzed by prankster twave.
It has priority taunt.
The tropius and parasect noms were an obvious joke. I'm not too sure about Choice Specs though...and smashpassing was nominated in UU.
And for extra lolz: Tropius, Parasect, Smashpassing, and Choice Specs were all nominated.
If all weather is banned, then will tyranitar be banned by proxy?
The weather abilities themselves are being nominated more so that the abusers. So IF all abilities are banned, how would Tyranitar be able to run amok if he has no other ability available to him?
Well it appears that Garchomp will be leaving once again. It's a shame because he probably wouldn't be broken outside of sandstorm.
I'm reading through the moninations thread right now, and I think that some of the arguments against thundurus are flawed. Blaziken and garchomp have one main set that is cited as broken, but people are saying that thundurus should be banned because:
It's the fastest poke in OU.
It has 115 / 125 offenses and NP.
It can sweep with tbolt, HP ice and focus blast for perfect coverage.
It can also beat blissey and tyranitar with taunt + hammer arm.
Scarfers and revenge killers are paralyzed by prankster twave.
It has priority taunt.
But not all on the same set. Faster revenge killers deal with it easily sans twave. Blissey can throw it around if it lacks hammer arm, which ends your sweep anyway (-1 speed.)
I am reading this thread and I really have to ask one thing:
What exactly is the point of trying to allow Swers back in like this?
Aldron's proposal was made on the grounds that without it, the fear of weather bans cascading would be banned. That's not how I see it. What you are trying to do is no different than these amusing requests to unban Blaze Blazeken. Rain is broken, and it was the Sw/Drizzle ban that kept in check. Now you want to try and undo that, but to such a small degree that this doesn't just turn back to round 2?
No pokemon, strategy, or ability has ever been twisted this much to the desperation from keeping it contained. If you guys are truly happy with your weather wars of gen 5, leave the meta as it is. Rain is doing just fine without the need for a boost, there is no reason to create this pseudo experiment just to see if one abuser might be ok with politoed.
I.E. Either undo the proposal and figure out where you want the ban hammer to strike, or leave it and keep your pseudo balance.
I'm reading through the moninations thread right now, and I think that some of the arguments against thundurus are flawed. Blaziken and garchomp have one main set that is cited as broken, but people are saying that thundurus should be banned because:
It's the fastest poke in OU.
It has 115 / 125 offenses and NP.
It can sweep with tbolt, HP ice and focus blast for perfect coverage.
It can also beat blissey and tyranitar with taunt + hammer arm.
Scarfers and revenge killers are paralyzed by prankster twave.
It has priority taunt.
But not all on the same set. Faster revenge killers deal with it easily sans twave. Blissey can throw it around if it lacks hammer arm, which ends your sweep anyway (-1 speed.)