what freaks me out most about genesect is 3 things:
1) almost any team can benefit from carrying it
2) it seems to be outclassed/beaten so easily in theory
and 3) it really doesn't look all that good on paper
yknow when we first heard about genesect's release, i actually made a big post, i think it was in this very thread, about how genesect does not outclass scizor and they're both fine uturners. i think that post remains correct even now, but it really illustrates the attitude i had at the dawn of genesect's appearance - this shit is solidly not OP. it's just a solid uturner, and we've never banned anyone for being a solid uturner.
funny how that theoretical attitude did not pan out in the long run. even now i find it incredibly difficult to describe what exactly it is about genesect that i don't like, what it is that i find unhealthy about it. is it the restrictions on teambuilding that it creates in the metagame? eh well maybe, but couldn't we say that about a lot of other things? is it hard to check? eh well maybe, but really the number of offensive checks to genesect isn't that short in theory, and surely shit like venusaur is harder to check right? has it overcentralized/over influenced the metagame? ehh well maybe, but couldn't we say that about rain, or sun, or deoxys-D? (which have all ALSO been brought up for suspecting. coincidence? keep reading....)
i don't think it's possible to describe what makes genesect such a problem for OU in terms of theory alone. it is absolutely NOT broken in theory. when i read pocket's post i found myself nodding to it, yet my position on genesect didn't change at all in my head. how can it be that a mon with so many answers to it is such a problem? am i just dumb? (MAYBE) the heart of it is its effect on the game is overwhelmingly visible, more so than any other single pokemon (deoxys-D does not even come close, and rain/sun are more about the abilities and the teams than about politoed/ninetales, both of which are shit mons barring rain/sun themselves).
i'm still struggling to describe my issue with it so i'm not sure how much farther i'll take this post, but i think two posts best reflect my position - bubbly's
here, and bri's
here:
bubbly said:
For instance, I've been using Spikes Roserade / Jellicent / Rocky Helmet Heatran on a few different teams and it completely takes Genesect out of the game (and even turns it into a liability in some instances).
Princess Bri said:
If you aren't using a Genesect on a team atm I feel like your team is worse than if you were... :|
when you need to counterteam a single pokemon with a 3-mon core, my eyebrows are going up. i mean of course bubbly's core works well against other major metagame threats as well, but clearly the issue in mind and the impetus of its creation is genesect. and for what it's worth, bubbly also mentioned that the team with that anti-genesect core? IT WAS RUNNING GENESECT. to quote frank's red hot sauce ads, we put that shit on everything.
in summary, this whole metagame is g-weak (props to PK for creating this excellent term), and i don't believe that going to the extent bubbly has (and that other players eventually will) to eliminate that weakness is a good solution to the problem. i'm not sure if it has to go, but i absolutely want to see a metagame without it before we start declaring that it is a healthy and acceptable influence on OU.