just want to say that if he's telling the truth (and i am now very confident that he is), barty
did tell us his role, and everything about him that he can.
role name: not allowed
flavor: not allowed
night action: vanilla/none
third paragraph: not allowed due to "special rule"
alignment: village
Sooooo let's quit asking him questions. Perhaps if he gets a sub the sub can explain what is going on in better terms.
@
cxinlee 1) you can't edit posts. 2) you were pretty lucky that i already unvoted barty before you voted for him. we are not trying to end the day just yet.
@
Celever is not against a barty lynch, but unvoted him. I've consistently said that he's been playing in a very similar manner to what he did in RNG NOC, and I stand by that up until this point. In RNG NOC, celever tunneled a player who he found suspicious, actively advocating a lynch on (iirc) all three of the first village lynches. In this case, he's tunneled barty all the way up until L-1, but now won't (help) pull the trigger. I can think of two explanations: 1) he's learned a little bit about tunneling people without letting them give a decent defense. 2) He's mafia and is trying to distance himself from the lynch, while still advocating it. I'm leaning toward the latter enough to put my vote on him.
Vote Celever
@
Houndoomsday has been echoing celever's statements, recently, but previously (pp 3-4 on 50 posts/page) the two got into a bit of a disagreement. I'm thinking that if the two were mafia buddies, they wouldn't both try to pressure barty, instead they'd let one pressure while the other two hang back. I have a feeling that only one of these two is mafia, and right now, as I said above, I'm leaning towards Celever, but it wouldn't take
too much convincing to make me swing the other way.