NOC Great Idea Mafia-Game Over! Mafia, vonFiedler, and More Cowbell win!

Status
Not open for further replies.
ninja'd. Anyway, I can't really decide who to Analyze. And it's kinda impossible to quote people on my crappy e-reader... I guess I could instead give an overview of everyone and fully analyze those who you want me to alaborate on. Just give me a sec to look over all the posts made on day 3 a 2nd time, then I'll post my first useful post (yay!)
 
ninja'd. Anyway, I can't really decide who to Analyze. And it's kinda impossible to quote people on my crappy e-reader... I guess I could instead give an overview of everyone and fully analyze those who you want me to alaborate on. Just give me a sec to look over all the posts made on day 3 a 2nd time, then I'll post my first useful post (yay!)
Sorry, but that's no excuse. "I don't know what to do" got Ullar lynched and Tesung under fire. An overview of what happened isn't useful, honestly, because anyone can read back, and Ace Emerald did one a couple pages back anyway. You don't have to quote multiple people, just answer one post primarily, and then answer others through tagging (which you do by typing "@[insert user here]").

First of all, I would like you to do a read on myself. I've posted a lot, so there should be lots of material for you to work with.
 
Idk about in America but I have some exams in a month or so, so I've been kinda busy with that.

Just on my iPad rn, but the above post you made about my post being the "easy let's all be friends" way out... I'm not sure what you mean. Can you tell me which post you were referring to?

I made a mistake there, I meant to say that obbmud was playing it safe there, not you. It was in reference to Tesung's question, and for some reason I mixed you and obbmud up.

Can't say I'm impressed by Pokeguy's posts; not posting anything useful is scummy for sure, but I have absolutely no idea if Pokeguy is in fact clueless or not. I'm leaning scum over town, but lynching someone for inactivity during MYLO is really risky IMO.
 
I made a mistake there, I meant to say that obbmud was playing it safe there, not you. It was in reference to Tesung's question, and for some reason I mixed you and obbmud up.

Can't say I'm impressed by Pokeguy's posts; not posting anything useful is scummy for sure, but I have absolutely no idea if Pokeguy is in fact clueless or not. I'm leaning scum over town, but lynching someone for inactivity during MYLO is really risky IMO.

Ah OK. I read the post a while ago and I was trying to figure out what you meant, but didn't have time to post. I'm glad you cleared that up! :p

IK that it is really risky, and I am really not opposed to anyone else being lynch (within reason), but the only real scumtells I have right now are Obbmudd, PokeguyNXB and sorta LW, but his theories etc. have helped him today. I'm going to think over some people today, though.


1. Ace Emerald
4. Celever
5. Tesung
6. spiresquire
8. LightWolf
9. Nitrox116
10. More Cowbell
11. Obbmud99
12. PokeguyNXB
13. starwarsfan
15. Walrein

First of all, let's cut out Nitrox, Ace Emerald and myself. Nitrox is obviously confotown for all of us, and IDK why, I'm just getting this really strong townie vibe from Ace Emerald. His posts tend to have lots of opinions backed up by good, substantial evidence and it seems like he is truly making an effort to help the town. Honestly I just wish he would post more. Cutting myself out on my own suspects list because... I'm not scum!

5. Tesung
6. spiresquire
8. LightWolf
10. More Cowbell
11. Obbmud99
12. PokeguyNXB
13. starwarsfan
15. Walrein

Next we have some noobs I want to talk about - Tesung and starwarsfan. I've made it very clear that I think Tesung is a noobtown. I attacked him Day 2 and imo he reacted fairly well. Not the best, but not bad either, which is all I can expect from a first-timer. On later days he has made an attempt to contribute iirc, but he's fallen a bit short. He also has a bad relationship with swf. I'm labeling him as noobtown right now, though. Starwarsfan is much more interesting, but personally I just see him similarly to Tesung. This is obviously his first game, but he's been reacting to pressure a little worse than normal, and has even seemed very paranoid at times, such as when 3 people targeted him in half an hour and he said "omfg this is obvo-planned!" I'm not getting quite so good a vibe from him as Tesung, but I would be willing to put him as town for now.

6. spiresquire
8. LightWolf
10. More Cowbell
11. Obbmud99
12. PokeguyNXB
15. Walrein

The experienced players itg are More, Walrein and LW. I brought this up at an earlier stage in my argument with LW, but it's interesting how none of them are really commenting on eachother. Hell, Walrein isn't commenting at all any more, despite being active in other parts of the forums, or even in Circus a la diplo. LW said it was because "experienced players react well under pressure so it's fine not targeting them" but you can at least say your thoughts on them. When I asked him his thoughts on the other two he literally said "well they're town, there isn't much more to say". This interests me, because it appears as if he knows something about one or either of them which he is willing to hide. More Cowbell hasn't commented a lot on either of them, either. The only times he comments on LW was when he was talking about the argument between us, and I can't remember a single comment about Walrein other than "he seems town to me". I would love it if you guys could comment on eachother, so in other words, I want Walrein to comment on LightWolf and More Cowbell, LightWolf to comment on Walrein and More Cowbell (you must have more to work with now?) and More Cowbell to comment on Walrein and LightWolf. In detail, please. Out of those 3, More Cowbell is the least suspicious to me. He's not off scot-free right now, but he's doing a pretty good job of being active, and trying to help the town in any way he can. He's also pretty humble :p. I will snip him from my suspects for now, so that leaves:

6. spiresquire
8. LightWolf
11. Obbmud99
12. PokeguyNXB
15. Walrein

OK, so after much thought I've decided that spiresquire and Walrein are scummier than I had in my head making some of my last posts. Reasons why:

spiresquire
This guy is town fairly unanimously thanks to some good, long posts, middling activity and opinions placed clearly on the table. What is my problem with him, then? Well, as soon as people regarded him as town, his posting quality went downhill a little bit, along with his activity. He pops in with a large post every now and again, but they aren't really anything spectacular any more, and he seems to be posting just enough to get by. I feel like an experience scum-buddy would have told him to do this upon arrival to the game, because it would mean less posts and so less chance of slipping, right? That's my theory, anyway. I would just love it if you could post more, @spiresquire...

Walrein
This is more interesting. His reluctance to contribute now of all times, in MYLO, is really quite unnerving. I know that some of his schoolwork has picked up, and he's hosting diplo, but I don't think it should be too hard for him to pop in every now and again to post a few reads or... well... anything. He's not very high priority on my suspects list, but he definitely makes the cut. He also hasn't commented on a huge range of players itg iirc, focussing mainly on Obbmud, Tesung, Ullar before he died and starwarsfan I think. All noobs... easy targets?

Obbmud99
Lol like I haven't made my opinion on this guy clear 1000 times already.

LightWolf
Like I've said before, his whole theory-posting stuff has redeemed him somewhat. I genuinely didn't find him scummy when I made the argument-provoking post about not trusting him so easily. He then went on the defensive and started a debate with me. He was paranoid, saying "I think you did mean the maliciously" or something and he began tunneling me for quite a while, as if it was an excuse to stop contributing so much. I have yet to go back and check for any contradictions between his older posts and his newer ones, but I expect to find some somewhere. He is still pretty high on my suspects list, even with the good contribution today.

PokeguyNXB
MAKE A GOOD/DECENT/ALRIGHT/OK/BARELY BETTER THAN SHIT POST FOR FUCK'S SAKE. You are literally wasting a player slot itg.

That's just my 2 cents. Just in case I die for whatever reason I decided to post a big tl;dr post about the players in this game and my standing on it for the most recent times, so people have something to go off should I get killed. I think I've said my reasons quite clearly for all of my suspects and why some of them aren't, but if you have any further queries don't be afraid to ask. It should put some life in this place lol.
 
Walrein
This is more interesting. His reluctance to contribute now of all times, in MYLO, is really quite unnerving. I know that some of his schoolwork has picked up, and he's hosting diplo, but I don't think it should be too hard for him to pop in every now and again to post a few reads or... well... anything. He's not very high priority on my suspects list, but he definitely makes the cut. He also hasn't commented on a huge range of players itg iirc, focussing mainly on Obbmud, Tesung, Ullar before he died and starwarsfan I think. All noobs... easy targets?
Just going to look at this read on Walrein. The targets of his scrutiny so far haven't been all noobs (as far as I can tell). I have a moderate amount of experience (from games that were rofl stomped by experienced players and inactivity), and I can see that starwarsfan was in wayne brady mafia (and to my knowledge you were too!). Wayne Brady didn't look like a simple game, so I would expect that he would have at least one more game of experience (starwarsfan help me out here: How many mafia games were you in?) The point is that the targets of walreins logic attacks were not all noobs, but they were all easy targets because other people had accused them before he did. I would also like to note that he went after Felony as well. To me this behavior is very suspicious, and while is opinions are good, he only seems to be on the offence on people that had recently been attacked already. Please explain Walrein . I'm waiting.
Pressure Lynch Vote Thingy Walrein
 
Just going to look at this read on Walrein. The targets of his scrutiny so far haven't been all noobs (as far as I can tell). I have a moderate amount of experience (from games that were rofl stomped by experienced players and inactivity), and I can see that starwarsfan was in wayne brady mafia (and to my knowledge you were too!). Wayne Brady didn't look like a simple game, so I would expect that he would have at least one more game of experience (starwarsfan help me out here: How many mafia games were you in?) The point is that the targets of walreins logic attacks were not all noobs, but they were all easy targets because other people had accused them before he did. I would also like to note that he went after Felony as well. To me this behavior is very suspicious, and while is opinions are good, he only seems to be on the offence on people that had recently been attacked already. Please explain Walrein . I'm waiting.
Pressure Lynch Vote Thingy Walrein
All of those games were OC. NOC is extremely different, so anyone who's first NOC game is this one is considered a noob as far as I'm concerned.
 
Hahaha Celever, it’s not basketball, it’s League of Legends :P I’m watching as well, so some quick reads on LightWolf and Walrein in between games:


I have bad experience with LightWolf in NOC games; I only recall playing one game with him prior to this, which was Mafia from the Depth. Everyone who played in that game or read the thread knows I was thrown for a loop big time there, thanks to LightWolf. Overall I don’t think he’s playing much different here, but overall I’m still getting a town feeling from this. I’m not sure whether it’s 100% essential to figure out the set-up of the game, and one can say that LW got stuck on that during Day 3, but overall it felt like a genuine attempt to help town to me. LW pointed out himself, there is no difference between townwolf and mafiawolf, and seeing as he’s an experienced player, I can see how he always appears town.

Overall, for LW, I’m leaning town, though you never know. At this point, however, I feel there are better targets for a MYLO lynch.


Onto Walrein; I don’t think he has posted anything in 48 hours if not more. I can understand hosting Diplomacy is taxing, but some involvement with the game would be good. However, the posts Walrein made earlier make me lean town on him. Those posts are so outdated, however, that I can’t really say much about Walrein now; he really needs to post more for others to base reads on. As of now, Walrein is kind of in the same boat as Pokeguy; super inactive, but I find it risky to lynch only on that during MYLO.


Also, I wouldn’t say OC and NOC are completely different; I think a good OC player will be able to quickly adapt to NOC, though NOC puts much more emphasis on the day threads. A decent OC player like starwarsfan should be able to play a decent game of NOC as well, me thinks.


Anyways, OMG vs SKT game 2 is on, so that’s it for now. I’ll be back later today.
 
Ha, hahaha, HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Man I'm tearing up. And I thought that last nights WIFOM kill would make me unable to put out anything against you Celever.

First things first, lets go back to Day 2, I'd say both of us at best contributed the same amount targeted at other players, you tunneled me as much as I tunneled you, and I at least had a better reason than that you attacking me. From the get go you started throwing wild accusations at me, starting with me being a major voting force behind the Felony lynch(and putting it in a false way that you were clearly not willing to confirm by simply checking back a few pages). Every single reply to my accusations you tried to bring up a point unrelated to our current argument trying to discredit me, and, using your own words, your first post about my voting of Felony was to say you don't trust me, and you said it in the most passive-aggressive manner possible! Day 1 you were generally defensive in your replies, instantly backing out when anything reasonable headed your way, then come Day 2 and you react in a passive-aggressive manner, like you don't trust backing out being effective anymore. Let's not forget you just claimed, you had no problem with me before I started tunneling you other than that you had nothing on me ergo had no idea which side I was on at all, yet you decided to take a jab at me, rather than reasonably point out people shouldn't be so quick to trust me(which I did, like day 1, right after people started doing it).

Sure later you did exactly that, but you also started tunneling me just as much, focusing on me completely, saying it multiple times and then bolding it too just so people know what I say shouldn't be taken for granted, funnily enough what I have been saying was that Celever is suspicious, and also seems to be going overboard as far as defending yourself goes since the whole thread keeps brushing off all my arguments aimed at you!

This brings us to one of your other points: The nature of my tunneling. Leaving aside the fact that I did actually do stuff beside tunnel you, lets answer why I was tunneling you. BECAUSE I'M GODDAMN FRUSTRATED!!! People have been ignoring nearly all my points against you that from my point of view are 100% legit. I can understand some degree of differences on how people view the world around them, but I can't understand how something as obviously suspicious as "A makes a point against B, B replies by questioning trustworthiness of A" is constantly ignored! And this is why I got Santa Baron in the first wave, because instead of raging, I went ahead and tried to pile on more pressure, explain my points and again hoping more detail would help clarify it, and kept on not working, and the one person who harbors similar opinions has constantly been TOOOOOOOO BUSY, to actually post a reasonable amount and has been sadly been discouraged from following this trail via the events of last night!(I have always claimed that my very frustrated post on the final day of Depths NOC was a dead give away of my alignment, while I stuck to it being what village wolf would have done, I think this at least makes me DAMNED CONSISTENT!)

BUT YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M THANKFUL! Why you ask? Because this has given me a chance to beyond the shadow of doubt prove my innocence!(Minus the case where both Celever and I are mafia, thankfully that still makes Celever mafia, so I don't see the problem there) See here is my argument, I spent a whole day arguing for the lynch of a specific person, having no one in the game support me, minus the one guy who we heard barely anything from. So say I'm mafia, I clearly told my team to discredit me in my endeavor then! One I think is completely reasonable and one I think is suspiciously being ignored(If it wasn't for the whole game doing it I'd actually use it as a point, which I currently can't). Heck it's very odd how no one at all jumped on it, leaves two options, because if I'm a villager, attacking another villager, mafia would have jumped in for sure, naturally for the remaining cases it goes either way, me telling my buddies they are better off staying away from it or Celever's mates trying to ignore my opinion into oblivion. But here is the thing, I'm still sticking to Celever, because I think my points are still legit(and just keep on being added to), yet it keeps being brushed aside, I think we can all agree on me actually believing in my points, so why haven't I gotten my scum friends to support me at least a little. And say you point at Walrein, if Walrein was my scummy, he'd have a knife at his throat and post I wrote up for him ready for copypasting and not fucking leave me alone after he makes a post finally to support my claims! Sure, these are all small points why my side of the story makes more sense(Especially the part where one of us should really be mafia) but they just add up, and that is without the context of other things I have done. Sure as I said there is only LightWolf no mafia or town wolf, but that doesn't change there are plenty of selfdestructive things a mafia would generally do. I went out of my way to point out how Ullar was a mafia aligned neutral, I went out of my way to argue with our host trying to clarify information that the mafia already clearly possessed(Just based on their own numbers they know the exact situation we are in). I will just say that anyone, who doubts my alignment after all this, is silly, simply utterly silly billy milly.

Man that was good to get out of my system, also if one thing is good about the new forums, is being able to see new posts as you write yours, HAHAHA Celever thought he was talking about baseball!

Now for some Conjecture: I'm somewhat sure on the following facts. The mafia likely has a Traitor, it's an obvious explanation as to why they'd kill the Innocent Child, rather than the mayor who is more likely to be protected. Next thing I'm currently looking at starwarsfan and Celever as my main suspects, I made my point against Celever and as for swf, he has been playing a very, extremely, miraculously perfect don't suspect me I'm active game, he says barely anything but posts enough to not really have anything actually against him, even when pressured he keeps this attitude. Fair enough he might be a stubborn new player who sticks to his style, but there is on slight problem here. We are playing a game, we are playing it because it's fun, sometimes, at parts... Meanwhile what swf is doing is not fun, he is doing nothing for the sake of survival, I simply can't imagine that someone new to NOC would have the strength to keep this up as a villager, as a mafia he'd at least have victory to look forward to, to which he contributed by playing honestly by the book, but as a village he is doing nothing that'd get him enjoyment from this game... I just think that his is a mask that a villager couldn't possibly wear. And if we take into account there is Celever's recent buddying on him, which strangely started on the day I set some decent points against him, rather than previous ones where he had some jabs at him. But yeah this is conjecture, my favourite kind of con!

Another one is a possible third scum Walrein, wouldn't put it behind him, that he purposefully posts about how he will make a post against Celever, misses the deadline on purpose, then orchestrates a kill that basically turns his argument into one practically defending Celever.

Yeah I'm getting less facty here, but I'm very much thinking I'm done for pretty soon and I might as well get my thoughts out now, rather than end up like in TP NOC where I get nightkilled before posting my opinions.

Oh and Vote Celever
 
LightWolf said:
Next thing I'm currently looking at starwarsfan and Celever as my main suspects, I made my point against Celever and as for swf, he has been playing a very, extremely, miraculously perfect don't suspect me I'm active game, he says barely anything but posts enough to not really have anything actually against him, even when pressured he keeps this attitude. Fair enough he might be a stubborn new player who sticks to his style, but there is on slight problem here. We are playing a game, we are playing it because it's fun, sometimes, at parts... Meanwhile what swf is doing is not fun, he is doing nothing for the sake of survival, I simply can't imagine that someone new to NOC would have the strength to keep this up as a villager, as a mafia he'd at least have victory to look forward to, to which he contributed by playing honestly by the book, but as a village he is doing nothing that'd get him enjoyment from this game... I just think that his is a mask that a villager couldn't possibly wear.
I don't think I'm keeping any mask up? I'm just being me and playing the game how it makes sense to me. Also believe me I'm having fun just watching, I can't keep any mask up for long, just ask Acklow how I couldn't resist taunting him on an anon in YASM.
 
That is kinda my point, as a villager you couldn't possibly keep up this behavior, but as a mafia you'd merely be executing a simple strategy. Even ignoring that, the play style you have been keeping up and you just claimed to have is not helping the town and only seems to serve your own survival. Huh, thanks for actually having me word my feelings into a more factual form, you act anti-town.
 
Ha, hahaha, HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Man I'm tearing up. And I thought that last nights WIFOM kill would make me unable to put out anything against you Celever.

Oh god, he's gone mad with desparation! D:

First things first, lets go back to Day 2, I'd say both of us at best contributed the same amount targeted at other players, you tunneled me as much as I tunneled you, and I at least had a better reason than that you attacking me. I have to disagree already. I made all kinds of posts D2. Some were directed only at you, others at the whole game. For most of day 2, 85-90% of your posts were directed at me. I also tried to include some thoughts on other players in my posts about you wherever possible or if I had time to do so. Furthermore, you attacked me first Day 2, and multiple other times D1 (with no provoking), not the other way around. From the get go you started throwing wild accusations at me, starting with me being a major voting force behind the Felony lynch(and putting it in a false way that you were clearly not willing to confirm by simply checking back a few pages). iPad. If in my post I use things such as "iirc" I will be on my iPad, and you should take lots of minor incorrect info like that with a grain of salt. Also you were very paranoid over that comment. I said "you may have influenced" not "OMG YOU KILLED FELONY HERP DERP!" Every single reply to my accusations you tried to bring up a point unrelated to our current argument trying to discredit me, and, using your own words, your first post about my voting of Felony was to say you don't trust me, and you said it in the most passive-aggressive manner possible! Sorry if I was passive-aggressive, I didn't mean to be? Day 1 you were generally defensive in your replies, instantly backing out when anything reasonable headed your way, then come Day 2 and you react in a passive-aggressive manner, like you don't trust backing out being effective anymore. Right. I backed out ALL the time. No big argument with Felony. Nothing like that. I actually got really interested about where you'd get my backing out from, so I decided to flick through Day 1. Your DLL accusation on me carried on to D2 (not backing out). That is literally the only argument I could see you thinking I backed out on, since the rest of the accusations directed at me were from Felony. Baseless accusations... I thought that was a scum tell? Let's not forget you just claimed, you had no problem with me before I started tunneling you other than that you had nothing on me ergo had no idea which side I was on at all, yet you decided to take a jab at me, rather than reasonably point out people shouldn't be so quick to trust me(which I did, like day 1, right after people started doing it). Lol wait a second, let me get this straight. You're saying that taking a jab at people who you don't suspect is bad? That's what you've been doing this whole bloody game!

Sure later you did exactly that, but you also started tunneling me just as much, focusing on me completely, saying it multiple times and then bolding it too just so people know what I say shouldn't be taken for granted, funnily enough what I have been saying was that Celever is suspicious, and also seems to be going overboard as far as defending yourself goes since the whole thread keeps brushing off all my arguments aimed at you! This is one of the funnier parts of this post, actually. "the whole thread keeps brushing off all my arguments". No, they haven't, they've been saying that they are incorrect arguments. There is a huge difference, but it seems that your vision is so centred on me right now that you can't notice any difference. Several users said that they were watching our argument carefully, and usually said that they could see nothing wrong with either of our posts. A good example would be Ace Emerald in post #198.

This brings us to one of your other points: The nature of my tunneling. Leaving aside the fact that I did actually do stuff beside tunnel you (see above. This is wrong), lets answer why I was tunneling you. BECAUSE I'M GODDAMN FRUSTRATED!!! So in other words, this post is you crumbling under pressure? What you've been trying to get the noobs to do? People have been ignoring nearly all my points against you that from my point of view are 100% legit. No they haven't, they said that your evidence was wrong, usually. I can understand some degree of differences on how people view the world around them, but I can't understand how something as obviously suspicious as "A makes a point against B, B replies by questioning trustworthiness of A" is constantly ignored! Well I was questioning the trustworthiness of you before the true argument started. In fact, me responding to you was what kicked it off. Here you contradict something you said above, and you admit that you attacked me first. And this is why I got Santa Baron in the first wave, because instead of raging, I went ahead and tried to pile on more pressure, explain my points and again hoping more detail would help clarify it, and kept on not working, and the one person who harbors similar opinions has constantly been TOOOOOOOO BUSY, to actually post a reasonable amount and has been sadly been discouraged from following this trail via the events of last night!(I have always claimed that my very frustrated post on the final day of Depths NOC was a dead give away of my alignment, while I stuck to it being what village wolf would have done, I think this at least makes me DAMNED CONSISTENT!) Consistent, or stubborn? I myself am extremely stubborn, but I don't think you should cloud it like that. Nothing else in the paragraph is worth commenting on, before you say "ermagherd answer everything". Right now I can't see anything there to answer, but I'm paranoid because it's a big piece of text without any substance.

BUT YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M THANKFUL! Why you ask? Because this has given me a chance to beyond the shadow of doubt prove my innocence! Yeah, all you have to do is push a lynch on me in MYLO! Oh wait, then you would lose, wouldn't you? -_-(Minus the case where both Celever and I are mafia, thankfully that still makes Celever mafia, so I don't see the problem there) The problem would of course come if we lynch you first. Seriously, you've gone loony itg. See here is my argument, I spent a whole day arguing for the lynch of a specific person, having no one in the game support me, minus the one guy who we heard barely anything from. So say I'm mafia, Oh, good WIFOM! I clearly told my team to discredit me in my endeavor then! One I think is completely reasonable and one I think is suspiciously being ignored(If it wasn't for the whole game doing it I'd actually use it as a point, which I currently can't). Heck it's very odd how no one at all jumped on it, leaves two options, because if I'm a villager, attacking another villager, mafia would have jumped in for sure, So if we're both villagers why did you bother with this post? naturally for the remaining cases it goes either way, me telling my buddies they are better off staying away from it or Celever's mates trying to ignore my opinion into oblivion. Of course, like many of your other points, this theory is let down by the fact that several people have responded to this argument. But here is the thing, I'm still sticking to Celever, because I think my points are still legit(and just keep on being added to), yet it keeps being brushed aside, I'm going to ignore any and all "my arguments were/are being ignored! ;_;" because it is untrue. I think we can all agree on me actually believing in my points, so why haven't I gotten my scum friends to support me at least a little. Because then if one of you is lynched we can say "x buddied with LW" and we'll have some very concrete evidence on you to help lynch you alongside your posting habits, possibly spelling the end for your faction. You're experienced, so you should know not to WIFOM, and if you do at least look at all possible consequences... And say you point at Walrein, if Walrein was my scummy, he'd have a knife at his throat and post I wrote up for him ready for copypasting and not fucking leave me alone after he makes a post finally to support my claims! Well actually, he's not been posting at all, so technically he's not left you alone. His most recent escapades have been with you, LW. Sure, these are all small points why my side of the story makes more sense(Especially the part where one of us should really be mafia) but they just add up, and that is without the context of other things I have done. Such as making a huge tl;dr post while seeming incredibly stressed? Sure as I said there is only LightWolf no mafia or town wolf, but that doesn't change there are plenty of selfdestructive things a mafia would generally do. I went out of my way to point out how Ullar was a mafia aligned neutral, I went out of my way to argue with our host trying to clarify information that the mafia already clearly possessed(Just based on their own numbers they know the exact situation we are in). I will just say that anyone, who doubts my alignment after all this, is silly, simply utterly silly billy milly. Oh? And I haven't done my bit for the town!? I mean, it is amazing that you would say that you've done things like that and completely disregard everything I've done. In fact, saying "I did x and I did y" makes it seem like you considered everything you were doing to make yourself seem less suspicious. I could do a big list of things I did which I consider worthwhile if you really want me to, but it would quite simply be trivial and pointless, and would only make me look scummier as it has done to you. For the record, though, the Ullar thing only affected one person (Obbmud) who said in his post "I guess Celever and LW are right", and my post influenced Tesung's vote as well. So my part in the Ullar wagon was more effective than your's. Also asking questions about something the mafias would already know as a mafia is such a basic and common strategy I'm surprised you even brought it up. I only didn't comment on it earlier because I didn't fully understand the conversation about the set ups - now that you confirm that it was asking about information a mafioso would know it makes me even more suspicious of you.

Also I thought you got on with billy mills? It's a shame you brought him into this! :(


Man that was good to get out of my system, also if one thing is good about the new forums, is being able to see new posts as you write yours, HAHAHA Celever thought he was talking about baseball! Oh my Jesus Grandma he doesn't play LoL! CONFOSCUM LYNCH PLEASE!

Now for some Conjecture: I'm somewhat sure on the following facts. The mafia likely has a Traitor, it's an obvious explanation as to why they'd kill the Innocent Child, rather than the mayor who is more likely to be protected. Not sure I follow this logic, but OK. Next thing I'm currently looking at starwarsfan and Celever as my main suspects, Wait, really? I thought we were in good terms! :( I made my point against Celever and as for swf, he has been playing a very, extremely, miraculously perfect don't suspect me I'm active game, he says barely anything but posts enough to not really have anything actually against him, even when pressured he keeps this attitude. Fair enough he might be a stubborn new player who sticks to his style, but there is one (grammar nazi, sorry) slight problem here. We are playing a game, we are playing it because it's fun, sometimes, at parts... Meanwhile what swf is doing is not fun, he is doing nothing for the sake of survival, I simply can't imagine that someone new to NOC would have the strength to keep this up as a villager, as a mafia he'd at least have victory to look forward to, to which he contributed by playing honestly by the book, but as a village he is doing nothing that'd get him enjoyment from this game... I just think that his is a mask that a villager couldn't possibly wear. And if we take into account there is Celever's recent buddying on him, which strangely started on the day I set some decent points against him, rather than previous ones where he had some jabs at him. But yeah this is conjecture, my favourite kind of con! Buddying? You mean not labeling him as a mafia is buddying on him? Pretty sure I explained my reasons clearly - if you have any qualms with the logic don't be a stranger and point it out! ^_^

Another one is a possible third scum Walrein, wouldn't put it behind him, that he purposefully posts about how he will make a post against Celever, misses the deadline on purpose, then orchestrates a kill that basically turns his argument into one practically defending Celever. I have no comment here really. I mean, I also suspect Walrein as a scum. I suppose a possible thing he could have done would be to have missed deadline like you said, then done a kill which turns his argument into one practically defending me to make people suspicious of me for doing a good kill? That's the only way your theory could be correct, but if my version of your theory is correct then that's a fairly good play, all respect be to him >_>

Yeah I'm getting less facty here, but I'm very much thinking I'm done for pretty soon and I might as well get my thoughts out now, rather than end up like in TP NOC where I get nightkilled before posting my opinions. You were final 6 iirc, lol.

Oh and Vote Celever

Oh good, a nice long post to respond to. This should pick the conversation up a bit. I'll put my comments up there in bold, so just look out for them ^_^. A couple things though -- while reading that a few of your points couldn't help but coming into my head. I'll go back and find them, word-for-word.

"More experienced people don't make that kind of mistake, they usually slip on the long run by contradicting their past posts or changing their playstyle so there is so little to grab onto." -- Lightwolf

"Only someone who thinks they did something wrong makes excuses." -- Lightwolf

I want all of you to understand that this is not an OMGUS when I Unvote PokeguyNXB, Lynch LightWolf. I didn't want this to happen and was willing to leave it in favour of more obvious targets for the day, but COME ON LIGHTWOLF. I mean seriously, a colossal post with so many incorrect facts, baseless accusations, hypocrisy and at one point just spouting excuses from your earlier plays just put you at #1 on my scum list. I don't expect a bandwagon on this vote and I don't really expect you to be lynched today either, I am just lynching my #1 suspect at this point in the game, which is what I always try to do aside from pressure votes.

Do you understand why I've been asking you about experienced players now, LW? I wanted to be able to use your own arguments against you when such a time comes when you slip, and if you didn't ever slip based on your criteria, I would have trusted you a little more. As it is, you've slipped up disappointingly early, on Day 3. Man, this game will be so much more boring without you for me, but at least once we lynch you there WILL be more game.
 
Also, my thoughts on the whole Celever/LW thing... LW's post seems to be the definition of cracking under pressure. I'll definitely look at this more closely as well, but wow, that escalated quickly.
 
My eyes hurt from reading your reply, for all that's holy don't do in quote replies.

Well lets go through it point by point anyways:

1. I let posts pile up before I went through them and posted opinions on the ones I felt worthwhile to point out, on the other hand when it came to replying you, I had to address your points as separate ones and frequently make a post for every one of yours, so percentages don't really prove anything, though I admit since you sprinkled in some small stuff into every post usually, so in numbers you likely still win, but as far as actual contribution goes we still stand on similar grounds(I also made a similar point against swf that day, the same one I made earlier this day, but he never actual replied to that one, so that never went off either). On the other argument here, you attack me directly, with the only points being raised, that I shouldn't be trusted, giving nothing solid with the only apparent reasoning that I'm attacking you, which is exactly what I said there "I at least had a better reason than that you attacking me".

2. It was still utterly silly, and 100% an OMGUS(hey thanks for reminding me of that phrase). The only reason you brought that up was to, wait I explained that already, not repeating myself, the actual content of your post hardly matters, only the result, which was to make distrusted.

3. You make it sound like I'm offended by your apparent passive aggressiveness, which I'm not, my problem is the sudden jump from being defensive to that.

4. I was referring to your DLE vote, my base for this whole witch hunt there, as base to show how you reacted differently to my accusations at that time and then later Day 2. I never said anything about Felony's accusations, they were p meh especially given the context of the quote he was attacking, if you remember I lynched him too. You are trying to divert to senseless accusations rather than ones that had a base, your reaction to Felony is irrelevant.

5. No what I'm saying is you took a jab at me as an OMGUS(like seriously, thank for this phrase). I'm not gonna explain it again, the only reason you made those was to discredit me, you took a jab at my cleanness, rather than just believe in your counterargument against my points.

6. What do you think brushing off my arguments means for god's sake! You say the same thing, people aren't taking clear sides, everyone is just sitting by, and they are ignoring my points because they don't accept them from their point of view, that's exactly what brushing off my argument means!

7. "I did actually do stuff beside tunnel you" I actually wrote a big paragraph here about you claiming that I did not do stuff besides tunneling you day 2, but you actually said that 10-15% percent of my posts I did do other stuff, so thanks for answering that.

8. You so silly Celever. Sure being frustrated, over people not listening to what I believe is right, what I think is true, is cracking under-pressure! What pressure am I cracking under exactly? You are basically the only person to actually suspect me at all, and the only reason I even reacted to it is because it's contradictionary as hell. You claimed to pulled of two OMGUSes, to discredit me, before even finding me scummy, you essentially admit to have 100% OMGUSed(I should at this point explain, that OMGUS means OH MY GOD YOU SUCK, and is a type of accusation which is purely reactionary and based on the fact the other side made points against or voted you) me there. So basically the only thing I'm cracking under is the frustration with the other players keep disagreeing with points that I simply can't understand how one can't see the logic behind him, essentially the whole game is committing the biggest scumtell, which is not making any goddamn sense!

9. You are again not understanding what ignoring my points means. You point out why they ignore my points, because they think they are wrong, that still means they are ignoring them!

10. At this point it is clear you read the line "I at least had a better reason than that you attacking me" completely wrong. I meant there that unlike your reason, mine wasn't just that you attacked me.

11. This one was mostly aimed at MC as he brought up my SL hunt in that game a few times already, and my final play was questioned by many back in the day, this was basically me saying, HA I told you I always act like that!

12., 13. and 14. Yeah you are just basically taking a piss on me here, kinda an OMGUS actually, I mean you are literally saying OMG U SUCK there

15. But none of them took part in it, they constantly don't take actual sides, don't actually analyse the arguments, the whole game has been acting like it's two villagers having a pointless argument, yet if this was true, why didn't the mafia try to use this situation, it's basically impossible that such a long-winded arguments keeps going for so long, yet the whole game keeps a neutral stance. I strictly believe that it's unreal to think that both of us are villagers at this point. This combines with my later point of trying to explain the highly unlikeliness of me being mafia to create an new argument that maybe finally will be something someone could finally agree with, I think you are mafia, and it's incredibly frustrating how I'm the only one who thinks that way!

16. And I'm gonna ignore this because you don't understand ignoring and disagreeing are not mutual exclusive

17. You are calling, my conviction to my argument, a WIFOM? Anyone can clearly see, that whatever I am, I mean my argument, you actually made that point previously when pointing out most people disagreed with my opinions, yet didn't find my scummy, it's because they know I actually believe my argument is real, this is at the point clear. My whole frustrations comes from believing in points that everyone seems to disagree with! Or in case by WIFOM you meant me asking my buddies, yeah I point that out later, it'd be silly to ask them, and would explain why no one is taking a side in our argument. I already stated this is part of the bigger picture here, I explain how the only likely explanations to the current situation are I'm mafia, you are mafia or we both are mafia, then I bring up the points why I'm unlikely to be a mafia, so by elimination it leaves the option where you are mafia. Though in retrospect I could be lyncher, still my point stands then, the utter lack of side taking likely means a mafia is involved, and if I'm lyncher I kinda can't be mafia!

18. I explained later that Walrein in the end posted neutrally too, he made his points against you, but basically instantly dropped them because of the night WIFOM. That and I have seen him talking on IRC like 2 days ago on Friday, so it's not like I couldn't get him to talk. Either way I'm basically saying if you wanna point out that Walrein could be my scumbuddy in response to my original post you'd have to realise how farfetched that was based on Walrein's last actual actions.

19. Ah thanks good point, yeah that is in my favour too actually. Considering the stress is basically from me being frustrated over the disagreement over my opinions, yeah WIFOM wise it's another point weighted towards me being innocent.

20. Yeah I agree, I usually really dislike having to bring up my positive exploits myself since the diminishes their value and makes it look like I only did them to look clean, alas you just contradicted yourself, since your actual post also mentioned there as positive points in my favour! If even you thought those were decently close to redeeming my suspicious moves then why do you suddenly think they are points against me. I did each of those exploits to help the village, I'm not saying that proves my cleanness, I'm saying the little things in my favour but in context of our argument and outside it, add up and I hope people can see that it's simply too unlikely with all things considered that I'm scum. Lets not talk about how you are arguing about stuff that yet again isn't there, no where did I say that you didn't do anything town like, I do find it amusing you make it an argument though and don't even bring up an example...

21. After I went Silly Billy, there was no turning back

22. We have a written confession here folks! Man you have been OMGUSing me a lot here(I merely found you thinking swf meant an actual sport amusing, way too overreact)

23. If there is a traitor, the innocent child kill actually makes sense, I mean even a rand on a big name unrelated to the trio of you, walrein and I say Ace or MC would have been an easy decision, since said people would be extremely unlikely to be protected and still would leave the WIFOM of leaving me or Walrein alive intact, yet they went for the one person who was also unlikely to be protected, with Walrein and mayor being much better options, this hunts towards the mafia not wanting to possibly waste a night idling due to the Traitor.

24. We are, you get the house I get the Porsche

25. Oh come on! That can't be the only mistake I made in that whole post, you just did that to not have a big empty uncommented space there!

26. As I said, that's just the topping, a small +0.1. If I had an actual problem with the actual defense you provided, I'd have made a paragraph on it, I said it was conjecture at the start of it, just getting my thoughts out.

27. We can agree to agree... Wait what? Yeah it's a crazy theory, but as an experienced player he could pull it off, I mostly brought it up so that his actions there wouldn't necessarily make him look good were you to flip mafia after which I'd likely be brutally murdered

28. Yeah I was one of the last night kills, eliminated after our first successful lynch, doesn't change the fact I missed the day deadline and failed to provide my thoughts to the game.

Yay done with the quote, now to your actual post:

So first you point out that I stated contradictions would be a give away, and then provide a quote that I contradicted, which funnily implies that if I want to reason in favour of my contradiction I'd be contradicting my contradiction quote! Sadly I do admit I'm making excuses, because I DID something wrong, I must have since people still disagree with my points, so I will keep explaining it again in different ways hoping to get people to understand them.

Yeah I went through the post and I made it clear that you missread so much of it, heck even the quotes you took from my previous posts you didn't grasp the full meaning of and just took them word for word. The OMGUS part is also amusing since you took a piss at me for like a good chunk of your reply and admitted to doing it in your previous posts too.

Have a nice day!
 
My god LightWolf, you can't just post a reaction like that without really making clear which of Celever's points you are referring to. You can say that Celever's post hurts to read, but at least it's clear what he's responding to. If you could make that post again while making clear what points you are referring to, then I can actually understand where the discussion is heading and share my thoughts on it.
 
Ha, hahaha, HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Man I'm tearing up. And I thought that last nights WIFOM kill would make me unable to put out anything against you Celever.

First things first, lets go back to Day 2, I'd say both of us at best contributed the same amount targeted at other players, you tunneled me as much as I tunneled you, and I at least had a better reason than that you attacking me. From the get go you started throwing wild accusations at me, starting with me being a major voting force behind the Felony lynch(and putting it in a false way that you were clearly not willing to confirm by simply checking back a few pages). Every single reply to my accusations you tried to bring up a point unrelated to our current argument trying to discredit me, and, using your own words, your first post about my voting of Felony was to say you don't trust me, and you said it in the most passive-aggressive manner possible! Day 1 you were generally defensive in your replies, instantly backing out when anything reasonable headed your way, then come Day 2 and you react in a passive-aggressive manner, like you don't trust backing out being effective anymore. Let's not forget you just claimed, you had no problem with me before I started tunneling you other than that you had nothing on me ergo had no idea which side I was on at all, yet you decided to take a jab at me, rather than reasonably point out people shouldn't be so quick to trust me(which I did, like day 1, right after people started doing it).

Sure later you did exactly that, but you also started tunneling me just as much, focusing on me completely, saying it multiple times and then bolding it too just so people know what I say shouldn't be taken for granted, funnily enough what I have been saying was that Celever is suspicious, and also seems to be going overboard as far as defending yourself goes since the whole thread keeps brushing off all my arguments aimed at you!

This brings us to one of your other points: The nature of my tunneling. Leaving aside the fact that I did actually do stuff beside tunnel you, lets answer why I was tunneling you. BECAUSE I'M GODDAMN FRUSTRATED!!! People have been ignoring nearly all my points against you that from my point of view are 100% legit. I can understand some degree of differences on how people view the world around them, but I can't understand how something as obviously suspicious as "A makes a point against B, B replies by questioning trustworthiness of A" is constantly ignored! And this is why I got Santa Baron in the first wave, because instead of raging, I went ahead and tried to pile on more pressure, explain my points and again hoping more detail would help clarify it, and kept on not working, and the one person who harbors similar opinions has constantly been TOOOOOOOO BUSY, to actually post a reasonable amount and has been sadly been discouraged from following this trail via the events of last night!(I have always claimed that my very frustrated post on the final day of Depths NOC was a dead give away of my alignment, while I stuck to it being what village wolf would have done, I think this at least makes me DAMNED CONSISTENT!)

BUT YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M THANKFUL! Why you ask? Because this has given me a chance to beyond the shadow of doubt prove my innocence!(Minus the case where both Celever and I are mafia, thankfully that still makes Celever mafia, so I don't see the problem there) See here is my argument, I spent a whole day arguing for the lynch of a specific person, having no one in the game support me, minus the one guy who we heard barely anything from. So say I'm mafia, I clearly told my team to discredit me in my endeavor then! One I think is completely reasonable and one I think is suspiciously being ignored(If it wasn't for the whole game doing it I'd actually use it as a point, which I currently can't). Heck it's very odd how no one at all jumped on it, leaves two options, because if I'm a villager, attacking another villager, mafia would have jumped in for sure, naturally for the remaining cases it goes either way, me telling my buddies they are better off staying away from it or Celever's mates trying to ignore my opinion into oblivion. But here is the thing, I'm still sticking to Celever, because I think my points are still legit(and just keep on being added to), yet it keeps being brushed aside, I think we can all agree on me actually believing in my points, so why haven't I gotten my scum friends to support me at least a little. And say you point at Walrein, if Walrein was my scummy, he'd have a knife at his throat and post I wrote up for him ready for copypasting and not fucking leave me alone after he makes a post finally to support my claims! Sure, these are all small points why my side of the story makes more sense(Especially the part where one of us should really be mafia) but they just add up, and that is without the context of other things I have done. Sure as I said there is only LightWolf no mafia or town wolf, but that doesn't change there are plenty of selfdestructive things a mafia would generally do. I went out of my way to point out how Ullar was a mafia aligned neutral, I went out of my way to argue with our host trying to clarify information that the mafia already clearly possessed(Just based on their own numbers they know the exact situation we are in). I will just say that anyone, who doubts my alignment after all this, is silly, simply utterly silly billy milly.

Man that was good to get out of my system, also if one thing is good about the new forums, is being able to see new posts as you write yours, HAHAHA Celever thought he was talking about baseball!

Now for some Conjecture: I'm somewhat sure on the following facts. The mafia likely has a Traitor, it's an obvious explanation as to why they'd kill the Innocent Child, rather than the mayor who is more likely to be protected. Next thing I'm currently looking at starwarsfan and Celever as my main suspects, I made my point against Celever and as for swf, he has been playing a very, extremely, miraculously perfect don't suspect me I'm active game, he says barely anything but posts enough to not really have anything actually against him, even when pressured he keeps this attitude. Fair enough he might be a stubborn new player who sticks to his style, but there is on slight problem here. We are playing a game, we are playing it because it's fun, sometimes, at parts... Meanwhile what swf is doing is not fun, he is doing nothing for the sake of survival, I simply can't imagine that someone new to NOC would have the strength to keep this up as a villager, as a mafia he'd at least have victory to look forward to, to which he contributed by playing honestly by the book, but as a village he is doing nothing that'd get him enjoyment from this game... I just think that his is a mask that a villager couldn't possibly wear. And if we take into account there is Celever's recent buddying on him, which strangely started on the day I set some decent points against him, rather than previous ones where he had some jabs at him. But yeah this is conjecture, my favourite kind of con!

Another one is a possible third scum Walrein, wouldn't put it behind him, that he purposefully posts about how he will make a post against Celever, misses the deadline on purpose, then orchestrates a kill that basically turns his argument into one practically defending Celever.

Yeah I'm getting less facty here, but I'm very much thinking I'm done for pretty soon and I might as well get my thoughts out now, rather than end up like in TP NOC where I get nightkilled before posting my opinions.

Oh and Vote Celever
54a.jpg

Obbmud99 said:
Lightwolf clearly misread celever's post when he said: "HAHAHA Celever thought he was talking about baseball!". Celever clearly thought it was: "For bloody basketball! -_-". Basketball and baseball are clearly not the same thing. INNNNSSSSTTTAAAAA LLLYYYYNNCCCHHHH! Also to answer celever's "Oh my Jesus Grandma he doesn't play LoL! CONFOSCUM LYNCH PLEASE!". Playing League is clearly the most accurate scum tell, so in everyone's next post they must announce if they play league or not, and then we can lynch them. It's easy and simple. Mafia members lack the means and ability to play league, so they must be scum.
That quote above was just sarcasm. It does not reflect my true opinions.

Shit hitting the fan cannot describe what is happening here. I would say shit is flying out of a jet engine. I shall voice my opinions on the matter. Sorry if i buchered the quotations. Purely accidental.

Ha, hahaha, HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Man I'm tearing up. And I thought that last nights WIFOM kill would make me unable to put out anything against you Celever.

Oh god, he's gone mad with desparation! D:

First things first, lets go back to Day 2, I'd say both of us at best contributed the same amount targeted at other players, you tunneled me as much as I tunneled you, and I at least had a better reason than that you attacking me. I have to disagree already. I made all kinds of posts D2. Some were directed only at you, others at the whole game. For most of day 2, 85-90% of your posts were directed at me. I also tried to include some thoughts on other players in my posts about you wherever possible or if I had time to do so. Furthermore, you attacked me first Day 2, and multiple other times D1 (with no provoking), not the other way around. From the get go you started throwing wild accusations at me, starting with me being a major voting force behind the Felony lynch(and putting it in a false way that you were clearly not willing to confirm by simply checking back a few pages). iPad. If in my post I use things such as "iirc" I will be on my iPad, and you should take lots of minor incorrect info like that with a grain of salt. Also you were very paranoid over that comment. I said "you may have influenced" not "OMG YOU KILLED FELONY HERP DERP!" Every single reply to my accusations you tried to bring up a point unrelated to our current argument trying to discredit me, and, using your own words, your first post about my voting of Felony was to say you don't trust me, and you said it in the most passive-aggressive manner possible! Sorry if I was passive-aggressive, I didn't mean to be? Day 1 you were generally defensive in your replies, instantly backing out when anything reasonable headed your way, then come Day 2 and you react in a passive-aggressive manner, like you don't trust backing out being effective anymore. Right. I backed out ALL the time. No big argument with Felony. Nothing like that. I actually got really interested about where you'd get my backing out from, so I decided to flick through Day 1. Your DLL accusation on me carried on to D2 (not backing out). That is literally the only argument I could see you thinking I backed out on, since the rest of the accusations directed at me were from Felony. Baseless accusations... I thought that was a scum tell? Let's not forget you just claimed, you had no problem with me before I started tunneling you other than that you had nothing on me ergo had no idea which side I was on at all, yet you decided to take a jab at me, rather than reasonably point out people shouldn't be so quick to trust me(which I did, like day 1, right after people started doing it). Lol wait a second, let me get this straight. You're saying that taking a jab at people who you don't suspect is bad? That's what you've been doing this whole bloody game!

Sure later you did exactly that, but you also started tunneling me just as much, focusing on me completely, saying it multiple times and then bolding it too just so people know what I say shouldn't be taken for granted, funnily enough what I have been saying was that Celever is suspicious, and also seems to be going overboard as far as defending yourself goes since the whole thread keeps brushing off all my arguments aimed at you! This is one of the funnier parts of this post, actually. "the whole thread keeps brushing off all my arguments". No, they haven't, they've been saying that they areincorrect arguments. There is a huge difference, but it seems that your vision is so centred on me right now that you can't notice any difference. Several users said that they were watching our argument carefully, and usually said that they could see nothing wrong with either of our posts. A good example would be Ace Emerald in post #198.

This brings us to one of your other points: The nature of my tunneling. Leaving aside the fact that I did actually do stuff beside tunnel you (see above. This is wrong), lets answer why I was tunneling you. BECAUSE I'M GODDAMN FRUSTRATED!!! So in other words, this post is you crumbling under pressure? What you've been trying to get the noobs to do? People have been ignoring nearly all my points against you that from my point of view are 100% legit. No they haven't, they said that your evidence was wrong, usually. I can understand some degree of differences on how people view the world around them, but I can't understand how something as obviously suspicious as "A makes a point against B, B replies by questioning trustworthiness of A" is constantly ignored! Well I was questioning the trustworthiness of you before the true argument started. In fact, me responding to you was what kicked it off. Here you contradict something you said above, and you admit that you attacked me first. And this is why I got Santa Baron in the first wave, because instead of raging, I went ahead and tried to pile on more pressure, explain my points and again hoping more detail would help clarify it, and kept on not working, and the one person who harbors similar opinions has constantly been TOOOOOOOO BUSY, to actually post a reasonable amount and has been sadly been discouraged from following this trail via the events of last night!(I have always claimed that my very frustrated post on the final day of Depths NOC was a dead give away of my alignment, while I stuck to it being what village wolf would have done, I think this at least makes me DAMNED CONSISTENT!) Consistent, or stubborn? I myself am extremely stubborn, but I don't think you should cloud it like that. Nothing else in the paragraph is worth commenting on, before you say "ermagherd answer everything". Right now I can't see anything there to answer, but I'm paranoid because it's a big piece of text without any substance.

BUT YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M THANKFUL! Why you ask? Because this has given me a chance to beyond the shadow of doubt prove my innocence! Yeah, all you have to do is push a lynch on me in MYLO! Oh wait, then you would lose, wouldn't you? -_-(Minus the case where both Celever and I are mafia, thankfully that still makes Celever mafia, so I don't see the problem there) The problem would of course come if we lynch you first. Seriously, you've gone loony itg. See here is my argument, I spent a whole day arguing for the lynch of a specific person, having no one in the game support me, minus the one guy who we heard barely anything from. So say I'm mafia, Oh, good WIFOM! I clearly told my team to discredit me in my endeavor then! One I think is completely reasonable and one I think is suspiciously being ignored(If it wasn't for the whole game doing it I'd actually use it as a point, which I currently can't). Heck it's very odd how no one at all jumped on it, leaves two options, because if I'm a villager, attacking another villager, mafia would have jumped in for sure, So if we're both villagers why did you bother with this post? naturally for the remaining cases it goes either way, me telling my buddies they are better off staying away from it or Celever's mates trying to ignore my opinion into oblivion. Of course, like many of your other points, this theory is let down by the fact that several people have responded to this argument. But here is the thing, I'm still sticking to Celever, because I think my points are still legit(and just keep on being added to), yet it keeps being brushed aside, I'm going to ignore any and all "my arguments were/are being ignored! ;_;" because it is untrue. I think we can all agree on me actually believing in my points, so why haven't I gotten my scum friends to support me at least a little. Because then if one of you is lynched we can say "x buddied with LW" and we'll have some very concrete evidence on you to help lynch you alongside your posting habits, possibly spelling the end for your faction. You're experienced, so you should know not to WIFOM, and if you do at least look at all possible consequences... And say you point at Walrein, if Walrein was my scummy, he'd have a knife at his throat and post I wrote up for him ready for copypasting and not fucking leave me alone after he makes a post finally to support my claims!Well actually, he's not been posting at all, so technically he's not left you alone. His most recent escapades have been with you, LW. Sure, these are all small points why my side of the story makes more sense(Especially the part where one of us should really be mafia) but they just add up, and that is without the context of other things I have done. Such as making a huge tl;dr post while seeming incredibly stressed? Sure as I said there is only LightWolf no mafia or town wolf, but that doesn't change there are plenty of selfdestructive things a mafia would generally do. I went out of my way to point out how Ullar was a mafia aligned neutral, I went out of my way to argue with our host trying to clarify information that the mafia already clearly possessed(Just based on their own numbers they know the exact situation we are in). I will just say that anyone, who doubts my alignment after all this, is silly, simply utterly silly billy milly. Oh? And I haven't done my bit for the town!? I mean, it is amazing that you would say that you've done things like that and completely disregard everything I've done. In fact, saying "I did x and I did y" makes it seem like you considered everything you were doing to make yourself seem less suspicious. I could do a big list of things I did which I consider worthwhile if you really want me to, but it would quite simply be trivial and pointless, and would only make me look scummier as it has done to you. For the record, though, the Ullar thing only affected one person (Obbmud) who said in his post "I guess Celever and LW are right", and my post influenced Tesung's vote as well. So my part in the Ullar wagon was more effective than your's. Also asking questions about something the mafias would already know as a mafia is such a basic and common strategy I'm surprised you even brought it up. I only didn't comment on it earlier because I didn't fully understand the conversation about the set ups - now that you confirm that it was asking about information a mafioso would know it makes me even more suspicious of you.

Also I thought you got on with billy mills? It's a shame you brought him into this! :(


Man that was good to get out of my system, also if one thing is good about the new forums, is being able to see new posts as you write yours, HAHAHA Celever thought he was talking about baseball! Oh my Jesus Grandma he doesn't play LoL! CONFOSCUM LYNCH PLEASE!

Now for some Conjecture: I'm somewhat sure on the following facts. The mafia likely has a Traitor, it's an obvious explanation as to why they'd kill the Innocent Child, rather than the mayor who is more likely to be protected. Not sure I follow this logic, but OK. Next thing I'm currently looking at starwarsfan and Celever as my main suspects, Wait, really? I thought we were in good terms! :( I made my point against Celever and as for swf, he has been playing a very, extremely, miraculously perfect don't suspect me I'm active game, he says barely anything but posts enough to not really have anything actually against him, even when pressured he keeps this attitude. Fair enough he might be a stubborn new player who sticks to his style, but there is one (grammar nazi, sorry) slight problem here. We are playing a game, we are playing it because it's fun, sometimes, at parts... Meanwhile what swf is doing is not fun, he is doing nothing for the sake of survival, I simply can't imagine that someone new to NOC would have the strength to keep this up as a villager, as a mafia he'd at least have victory to look forward to, to which he contributed by playing honestly by the book, but as a village he is doing nothing that'd get him enjoyment from this game... I just think that his is a mask that a villager couldn't possibly wear. And if we take into account there is Celever's recent buddying on him, which strangely started on the day I set some decent points against him, rather than previous ones where he had some jabs at him. But yeah this is conjecture, my favourite kind of con! Buddying? You mean not labeling him as a mafia is buddying on him? Pretty sure I explained my reasons clearly - if you have any qualms with the logic don't be a stranger and point it out! ^_^

Another one is a possible third scum Walrein, wouldn't put it behind him, that he purposefully posts about how he will make a post against Celever, misses the deadline on purpose, then orchestrates a kill that basically turns his argument into one practically defending Celever. I have no comment here really. I mean, I also suspect Walrein as a scum. I suppose a possible thing he could have done would be to have missed deadline like you said, then done a kill which turns his argument into one practically defending me to make people suspicious of me for doing a good kill? That's the only way your theory could be correct, but if my version of your theory is correct then that's a fairly good play, all respect be to him >_>

Yeah I'm getting less facty here, but I'm very much thinking I'm done for pretty soon and I might as well get my thoughts out now, rather than end up like in TP NOC where I get nightkilled before posting my opinions. You were final 6 iirc, lol.

Oh and Vote Celever

Oh good, a nice long post to respond to. This should pick the conversation up a bit. I'll put my comments up there in bold, so just look out for them ^_^. A couple things though -- while reading that a few of your points couldn't help but coming into my head. I'll go back and find them, word-for-word.

"More experienced people don't make that kind of mistake, they usually slip on the long run by contradicting their past posts or changing their playstyle so there is so little to grab onto." -- Lightwolf

"Only someone who thinks they did something wrong makes excuses." -- Lightwolf

I want all of you to understand that this is not an OMGUS when I Unvote PokeguyNXB, Lynch LightWolf. I didn't want this to happen and was willing to leave it in favour of more obvious targets for the day, but COME ON LIGHTWOLF. I mean seriously, a colossal post with so many incorrect facts, baseless accusations, hypocrisy and at one point just spouting excuses from your earlier plays just put you at #1 on my scum list. I don't expect a bandwagon on this vote and I don't really expect you to be lynched today either, I am just lynching my #1 suspect at this point in the game, which is what I always try to do aside from pressure votes.

Do you understand why I've been asking you about experienced players now, LW? I wanted to be able to use your own arguments against you when such a time comes when you slip, and if you didn't ever slip based on your criteria, I would have trusted you a little more. As it is, you've slipped up disappointingly early, on Day 3. Man, this game will be so much more boring without you for me, but at least once we lynch you there WILL be more game.

Reads off of these posts:
First off, I see that Lightwolf claiming that celever was going after him, and that lightwolf was simply retaliating to the tunneling. As far as I can tell, Lightwolf started it with post #185. Celever didn't really return fire either, and actually stated that you might be right in post #188. I agree with celever here; you come back, with tons of new information to comment on, but instead you focused on only one portion of it; celever's post 188. You tunneled him, he simply defended himself. C-1, L-0

Second, people hadn't really been completely brushing off your arguments, but they also read celever's defense of accusation as well. If celever is good enough at defending his actions, people aren't going to bandwagon him because they feel his comments are rational. C-2, L-0

Lightwolf's recent tunneling has been diverted only by speculation over village and mafia number predictions. Lightwolf, people haven't been ignoring your posts because your points have equally good defenses to them.

It doesn't mean we don't find some of your points relivant. I personally see celever as scum also. Day 1 he lynched felony (#102) for being "the most defensive play who hasn't been under serious fire". Celever, you are playing some serious defense as well, and as lightwolf has said before: everyone is a hypocrite. Should we lynch you for playing aggressive defense like felony did. Also when I began day three, (#322) I voted celever for lynching felony and ullar. In tesung and celever's first posts that day both included a lynch vote on me. celever was claiming that he was voting me because I was tunneling tesung on day 2, and tesung was lynching me because I stopped tunneling swf with a stupid argument over the definition of tribunal. They seem to have started the day tunnel voting me. Why does it seem common for you to end up voting very similarly? Only once did tesung vote celever, and then he backed off to hop in the ullar train a few posts later. Please explain your behavior.

I'm going to stay on walrein because I want to see what he has to say, and how he can explain hoping on to both the felony and ullar wagons. I am watching lightwolf, celever, and tesung carefully though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top