I'm gonna try and respond to your points individually.
Are you trying to say that my posting about Mega-Zam is irrelevant because I'm saying that I think Mega-Zam should be banned? Because I don't get how it would be off topic. In my original post I made a point that Mega-Zam is still a huge threat, posted calcs to show that he's not as frail as some may think, and that he still hits really hard, all totally relevant points concerning whether or not he should be rebanned.
I kind of get what you're trying to say here, but I don't see what point you've made. If you had some more data to go with this bit of information it would mean a lot more.1. I believe that in OU there was actually a table computing relative offensive power, and there was also an addition to the Honkalculator 4000 that allowed you to run tests against the entirety of a tier, since even though Weavile may have very high stats and Knock Off, a Starmie with an Analytic boost and a Life Orb using Hydro Pump will still do more damage to the entire tier (not sure if that's exactly true, the Honkalculator is not currently working for me)
I don't see how this is relevant, as I said before:2. I believe there was some sort of a rule in OU during the Aegislash test NOT to bring up the 720 BST argument, due to the fact that it didn't actually work out that way most of the time.
This is a different argument from the one you brought up with Aegislash as I'm not making an argument about Mega-Zam's overall BST, but the fact that he's got high stats where it counts. I just showed in my original post that Mega-Zam has good enough bulk to take priority hits and some SE moves from a relevant scarfer who some might just assume can OHKO Mega-Zam, then dish back out some serious damage, I even posted calcs to prove it.Mega-Zam still has ridiculously high stats in the right places
Once again I don't really see what you're trying to say here. What you just described is what we're doing in this thread right now, we're talking about whether or not this poke should be rebanned.3. UU should at least try to accommodate whatever threat has been dropped in, and if, after accommodating it, it is deemed to be unhealthy for the metagame, then it should be rebanned.
Are you trying to say that my posting about Mega-Zam is irrelevant because I'm saying that I think Mega-Zam should be banned? Because I don't get how it would be off topic. In my original post I made a point that Mega-Zam is still a huge threat, posted calcs to show that he's not as frail as some may think, and that he still hits really hard, all totally relevant points concerning whether or not he should be rebanned.