this part of your post really interested me, basics (not being facetious). the idea of 'what makes ____ good' is pretty subjective though, isnt it? i dont think its any one person's place to determine what makes hip hop good. haha but then again, i really cant blame you, or ANYONE who has that mindframe, as im guilty of it myself. i have a difficult time respecting people who like bands like nickelback, lol. i guess by nature we all have our ideas of what makes certain things definitively good.
as for this album, i havent listened to much of it, but i enjoyed it. i dunno, i dont really know shit about hip hop, and dont actively listen to much hip hop outside of anticon., but theres something about kanye i just like.
as for curtis, fuck that. as i said, i dont know shit about hip hop, but the little knowledge i have is enough to get me to realize that 50 cent is a fucking joke compared to the plethora of other options out there, lol.
I don't like 50 at all, but he can definitely appeal to people. He was a bad example. Chuck D had a really good quote describing how he felt that being like an internationally renowned hip-hop artist was a unique situation for a black man at the time. On the one hand, he had to rock it, otherwise people would lose interest in him, but on the other, he also wanted to make his rap political. Public Enemy is almost indisputably one of the greatest hip-hop groups of all time because they found the balance. Their music is fun to listen to, their production was good, and they were extremely political, but they never lost touch with the fact that hip-hop is, at its core, a primitive, beat-driven genre of music.
When hip-hop like
first originated back in the early 70s, like back in the days of Grandmaster Flash, Afrika Bambaataa, like even before RSC and Crazy Legs, it was all about the DJs, right? Pete Jones, Kool Herc, all those guys. But it's easier to market emcees than it is to market DJs, so when rap went mainstream, with SHG, PE, etc. it became more about the emcees, but it's just... it's not the same if you don't have that double-stuff.
Rap didn't start out like rock did. Some of the greatest rock songs in the world don't have extremely meaningful lyrics, a lot of them do, but it's not necessarily what the genre is about. Hip-hop has always been about social consciousness, so that aspect has to be there, but with I Tech, he's like... well, he's honestly not a very good rapper, he's not good at presenting himself, he has bad stage presence, and he has trouble keeping a beat. He has a lot to say, but he doesn't know how to say it.
Also, I kinda like Tech once in a while. There are a couple songs by him that I like, but in general, he's just not too great.