• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

Postgame Acid City's Trouble CO-1 [Endgame: Smugglers & Vodoo Win!]

Not quite sure about Shubaka, mainly because all we have to go on for him is a lack of a tag. If King's scum, it could also be spilled wine. Scum implicating townies as scumpartners isn't a new trick in my experience. I'd rather focus on the direct angle and get more information out of King.

Players who haven't answered the RQS yet: Oddish. Hawkie Vanillish Wafer shubaka17 rssp1 DeathByWobbuffet
I'm in school atm. Expect to see an answer anytime after 6-ish. I'll be home by then.
 
Okay, Random Question Sequence incoming. (Not all of these will be in the form of a question.)

1. Name a scenario where Policy Lynch is a bad idea.
2. Player A claims a unique role on Day X. The next day, Player B makes a counterclaim. How do you respond?
3. What's the most likely scenario in which you would strongly disagree with your strongest townread?
4. And the inverse of the above: what's the most likely scenario in which you would strongly agree with your strongest scumread?
5. Out of a total of 100, assign percentage values to the importance of these 4 things: power roles, scumhunting, teamwork, luck. (Pie chart optional.)
6. Does Ad Hominem ever work as a means of scumhunting? Why or why not?
7. What mafia-related buzzword/phrase would you love to remove altogether from mafia games?


1. When you have some sort of lead on potential scum.
2. One of them is lying, but I have no idea which one. I guess examine their activity for any leads.
3. When I have proof that it's incorrect. Outside of that, I'm not sure
4. See above.
5. Power Roles 25%, Scumhunting 35%, Teamwork 15%, Luck 25%
6. I suppose an Ad Hominem response could represent nervousness, which hints at scumminess.
7. Idk
 
1. Name a scenario where Policy Lynch is a bad idea.
Whenever you have strong evidence/reasoning to lynch someone else

2. Player A claims a unique role on Day X. The next day, Player B makes a counterclaim. How do you respond?
Question why they didnt claim previously and go from there

3. What's the most likely scenario in which you would strongly disagree with your strongest townread?
I don't get this question, someone being your strongest townread is irrelevant to you disagreeing w/ them

4. And the inverse of the above: what's the most likely scenario in which you would strongly agree with your strongest scumread?
see above but flip the statement

5. Out of a total of 100, assign percentage values to the importance of these 4 things: power roles, scumhunting, teamwork, luck. (Pie chart optional.)
1% 1% 1% 97%
pr/scumhunting vary depending on the theme, they total to around 70% imo
25% teamwork 5% luck

6. Does Ad Hominem ever work as a means of scumhunting? Why or why not?
no
its nai too so it doesnt help in the slightest
theres only the off chance that you piss a scum off and make them scumslip but town may "scumslip" too by just saying incorrect things bc they're angry

7. What mafia-related buzzword/phrase would you love to remove altogether from mafia games?
anything I dont understand
 
Cancer's putting pressure on a no-show, which doesn't work if there's no response. I'm still waiting for a few players to answer the RQS. Then there's your vote on Dentricos, which still hasn't been properly addressed. So we've got three situations where more time would be useful.

Why would you contradict yourself like that, anyway?
 
Yeah this is why Smogon NOC doesn't work without more context, especially if you try to force it by lurching into a full playerlist with tons of known idlers.

Vote Hawkie

Speaking of known idlers, this ins't one of them.
 
Cancer's putting pressure on a no-show, which doesn't work if there's no response. I'm still waiting for a few players to answer the RQS. Then there's your vote on Dentricos, which still hasn't been properly addressed. So we've got three situations where more time would be useful.

Why would you contradict yourself like that, anyway?
It's been what like 2 days? and we're just NOW barely starting anything, my votes on Rssp + Dentricos was a reaction based lynch, Rssp was idle, Dentrico is interesting as of now. As of now we're STILL waiting for people to answer the RQS from you. More time will just let idlers idle longer, if pressure is set on the idlers they will either respond or die idling.
 
Okay, Random Question Sequence incoming. (Not all of these will be in the form of a question.)

1. Name a scenario where Policy Lynch is a bad idea.
2. Player A claims a unique role on Day X. The next day, Player B makes a counterclaim. How do you respond?
3. What's the most likely scenario in which you would strongly disagree with your strongest townread?
4. And the inverse of the above: what's the most likely scenario in which you would strongly agree with your strongest scumread?
5. Out of a total of 100, assign percentage values to the importance of these 4 things: power roles, scumhunting, teamwork, luck. (Pie chart optional.)
6. Does Ad Hominem ever work as a means of scumhunting? Why or why not?
7. What mafia-related buzzword/phrase would you love to remove altogether from mafia games?
1. Policy lynches are almost always a bad idea imo. I feel like they're way too easy for mafia to exploit, and they hurt town more often than help.
2. I think it depends on the scenario. Idk, I've only been in four games (not including this one) and this scenario had never come up. The closest is on mafiauniverse, people like to leave fake cop peaks, but there's not usually a genuine claim. I guess it really would depend on the situation hand and the players involved.
3. Once again, it'd probably depend on what they said.
4. Pretty much the same as 3.
5. Scumhunting 50%, teamwork 25%, PRs 25%, luck 25%
6. I don't think anyone should ever have to resort to personal attacks, so I'm gonna say no. Personal attacks are unnecessary and just make the game toxic.
7. Not really.
 
Yeah...

unvote

Vote extension This just isn't gonna work out the way things are going right now.

Tbh I think we're all relying a little too much on waiting for everyone to answer those questions. Hopefully they'll come around tomorrow, and we'll get extension. Well, actually, DeathByWobbuffet will likely answer by tomorrow, but idk where Hawkie and Shubaka are. In fact, Shubaka hasn't logged on since Thursday.

King, can you explain what about Dentricos makes them interesting?
 
Yo rssp1 why are you defending Hawkie before he even speaks? This kind of stuff really annoyed me in the last game where I try to pressure people and others immediately make excuses for them.

unvote vote rssp1
 
Yeah...

unvote

Vote extension This just isn't gonna work out the way things are going right now.

Tbh I think we're all relying a little too much on waiting for everyone to answer those questions. Hopefully they'll come around tomorrow, and we'll get extension. Well, actually, DeathByWobbuffet will likely answer by tomorrow, but idk where Hawkie and Shubaka are. In fact, Shubaka hasn't logged on since Thursday.

King, can you explain what about Dentricos makes them interesting?
The response of Dentricos to RQS other responses to my lynching of Dentricos
 
The response of Dentricos to RQS other responses to my lynching of Dentricos
I suppose I can see why Dentricos' reaction to your vote would look odd, but I personally see it as nai. Dentricos has been making those jokes since neighborhood mafia. Plus, I don't think you phrased your vote in a serious enough manner for them to react in a serious way.
 
Also this is off topic but it's bothering the living shit out of me, I messed up on my math big time in my answer to knight's questions, holy shit. Make it 50%, 25%, 15%, 10%
 
FYI I've been feeling really physically awful today and thus super reluctant to make any serious posts, vote extension since it'll give me time to feel better and contribute
 
Back
Top