Gotta agree on playing observer instead of getting involved. Participation generates discussion generates tells, none of which a Townie should be particularly afraid of.
3 and 4, Blazade? Learning what's likely to cause a Town on Town can be helpful with sorting reads. And the inverse might be able to help me sort buddying tells. And it all helps me get a better understanding of people I've never played with before (which is everyone except Cancer).
Hawkie, you're not the first player to say my RQSes suck. If you'd like to offer criticism once the game is over, I'd gladly welcome it. Don't think dropping crumbs about a PR is a good idea, though.
Town lean on Oddish. Friendly and involved in discussion, willing to clarify statements and learn about unfamiliar terms.
Slight Town lean on Cancer, but I'm only familiar with his Townplay (if you count one game as familiar) and don't know if his pressure votes are NAI.
Slight scum lean on Wobbuffet for letting an RVS vote hang after discussion gets underway.
Scum lean on King for hypocritical behavior (PL stance and going from tag everyone to why bother extending), and for trying to shut down discussion instead of letting the conversation resolve naturally.
Null on everyone else so far. Not sure what to make of those players who treated question 4 as if it was exactly the same as question 3, but that might just be me being nitpicky.