The beautiful thing about Texas posting his notes from pre game and building off them is he can do that as scum and still generate a legitimate towngame. I read this as mostly NAI for Texas but really pure and definitely worth engaging.
I disagree that Earlio's first post is any kind of indicator that he's town but nevertheless I've been unable to find scum motivation in his activity up to now. I'm still not sure I understand Twin's arguments after their banter either.
I also don't agree with your argument on Whydon. Making a suggestion for other people to investigate a wagon without following up yourself is just trying to create a distraction.
I've been town leaning Jalmont and Xnadroj because I see them as engaged and your arguments for scum reading them are subtle enough that I'm gonna have to reread the game to engage with them properly.
Now that I've slept on it I'm still good voting aubisio here but I recognize that I might be biased because I'm doing it essentially becauae I don't like how his read has developed toward me, it feels really bandwagony and revisionist.
I could also vote Whydon or Jordan pending a reread at this point, or Durza, or apricity. I probably don't vote Jalmont and I definitely don't vote moodycloud or Texas here.
Still busy this weekend and it's only gonna get worse next week when I go to a conference.