• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

NOC New World NOC - GAME OVER

Oh yeah, if it's not jalmont (or whydon, but I also just want to believe the mafia don't have both idlers), then it's caporegime

but anyways, if I have to go with the path of least resistance. Let's vote hannah and then vote M2H
 
It is an interesting question though, since normally we've been talking about who can't be Former's partner rather than who can be.

Entirely possible for Former to be leading Hannah/Whydon and threatening to quit/self hammer because he's tired of having to be the only one on his team even trying. Former pushing Hannah early is a bit weird though, could be normal busing but idk not sure overall on that relationship.
 
Seriously though, why has Whydon avoided all of the scrutiny that Hannah's gotten? This is aimed mostly at Former who is pushing Hannah rn, but question is for everyone I guess.
 
one time I shot her in popcorn mafia for going afk for like two days and she profusely thanked me for keeping her from having to play.
 
I've never seen Hannah play Mafia, only know her from survivor... But she did quit a survivor instead of being scummy against vooper... But then again I've heard of so many stories of hannah snaking vooper in other eimm. But yeah, I don't know hannah's games outside of ffa/eimm/survivor/non-alignment-games.
 
HeaLnDeaL said:
Seriously though, why has Whydon avoided all of the scrutiny that Hannah's gotten? This is aimed mostly at Former who is pushing Hannah rn, but question is for everyone I guess.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure it's because M2H focused her early because he was planning to bus her and everyone else followed in suit.
 
But yes, clearly my partners are Hannah/Whydon.

But hm, I wonder what it says when my two most logical partners, are the two people who could be partners with literally anyone.
 
HeaLnDeaL said:
Uh yeah, what part of me being Former's scummate makes ANY sense? I voted his ass on day 1 and he SHOULD have been lynched if it wasn't for host error.
Click to expand...

This unfortunately is not a great take because *should* means nothing as contextually speaking everyone thought that inferno was getting lynched. clearly if you and former are on a scum team then it's in your interests to switch the vote to somehow who isn't you/former, aka inferno. we won't ever know how it would've played out had cap's unvote been counted
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top