Clarinet iso first thoughts - clar seems much more frazzled in an iso reading than when his posts came in one at a time in the thread. I'm not sensing any strong cohesion between the posts, and I don't see a sense of shared logic. Which is well... as others have said, wishywashy. I can't remember exact games I've played with clarinet before, I remember one where he died early but can't remember a lot... but I never remember viewing him as scatterbrained as his iso looks now. It seems different. Might try to dig up the few games we played together but bleh. In terms of clarinet's interactions with the other three... they jump around too much for me to see a complex system of logic. idk I feel weird.
Cancerous iso first thoughts - really don't see anything bad or wrong with cancerous's posts. They are making a character, we know they are acting, too soon to say if its acting because they have to (i.e. canc is scum) or if canc us acting because it makes d1 more fun to everyone and it would be painful otherwise. The iso also showed much much fewer cancerous posts than I would have guessed, suggesting they are not at tightly in a web of convos, even if a lot of others have talked about canc.
Mikey iso first thoughts - he is obv town. as obv town I sort of view him immune from this relationship web that I'm looking into. As town, he doesn't know any of the other 3 are scum or town. his iso itself is good, he's engaging far about surface level. he reminds me of what a certain player could play like if they weren't sidetracked in showing off and being an ass.
Heury iso first thoughts - okay, his iso is a lot smaller than I expected, too. I'm sorry, but I really can't find a single relevant post of his. Why the heck are so many players talking about such an irrelevant poster? He memes and hasn't added anything. He might have a slightly uhh annoying tone (not quite arrogant, but more like he really doesn't want to engage too deeply with others because his time is more valuable) and I guess maybe players like to squeeze reads out of what annoys them. If anything, anyone commenting about heury I don't think is *truly* commenting about heury, and instead they are trying to explain subconsciously if he annoys them and then if that annoyance is even relevant.
--
On the relationship webs of the 4: I believe that Cancerous and Heury are doing a lot of acting; comedic roleplaying for Cancerous and sorta jokester/game trolling for Heury. Compared to them Clarinet's words seem less discernible as acting, even though I really don't think I've seen clarinet act quite like this before. Clarinet's mind jumps all over the place. My gut reaction is that a lot of comments from and about these players are more of just spew about the appropriateness of acting or the appropriateness of being annoying. Smogon tries to keep things on the game and is consistent with logic, Clarinet tries to keep things on the game but is inconsistent, and Cancerous and Heury more of keep things out of the game with their personas dominating their game involvement.
Ugh, I'm still processing things. I don't think I really touched on relationships as much as smogon asked me to, but I also don't really see them. It's a cycle of annoyances and a cycle of acting. We can question if the acting is done intentionally to preserve a (scum) relationship but idk.
idk wut exactly Mikey was expecting to get out of asking me to make this post, but I feel like my own head is a bit more mixed up after doing it. Cancerous and heury seem to be posting more about and aligned with their own personas than they are posting to preserve a relationship, which itself makes it really hard to find a relationship web when two people are more in their own heads than trying to figure out what is in the heads of others.