HnD - he's not stepping on anyone's toes, I enjoy this comfort but in future phases, I expect HnD to blossom.
That's actually not a bad strategy for scum, nobody will go after you out of OMGUS if you're not stepping on anyone's toes. Not saying Heal's scum, but I wouldn't add someone to the "do not lynch" list based on this reasoning.
heury - I think Crabs will use this to link me to heury again, but I want him around, heury is a mysterious being and it got me feeling something when I followed his posts, it was a rollercoaster. Obv if heury keeps being stubborn and refuses to clear misunderstandings, I'm all open for preparing a noose for him.
Well, couldn't blame him if he did. The second part ounts to "let's not kill heury unless he's being scummy".
depthful and pure reads on d1 are infinitely more appreciated
Sure, if you can produce such. The preference order is still: detailed reads>shallow reads>no explanation for reads
ok i didnt read the context so i cant comment on that but in general i think it's a lot easier to complain about activity vs going after and attacking people who actually post. it's a very reasonable position to take that "i can;t control how much someone posts, so instead of getting worked up about that and focusing on the inactivity, i'm going to look closer at the people who are posting"
unless you want to vote inactive people right now, what's the use in calling everyone who isn't meeting a post requirement mafia?
I can't control how much people post, but I can make a remark about inactive people without getting worked up. Just because I mention it, it's not the center of my attention. As for context, Clarinet posted a list of active players saying "there's usually at least one talkative mafia" and I think there's a difference between "I'm going to focus on active players to see if any of them is suspicious" and "there's at least one mafia among these guys". To be honest, I didn't get the impression that Clarinet is doing the former.
______
Town->Mafia gradient (excluding Thunder and Explosion, because there's nothing to evaluate):
Bloodyrain: innocent child
Panic: rapidfire posting apparently anything that crosses their mind. Not all of contributes to the game, but overall I didn't see anything suspicious and I think this'd be difficult to do as mafia.
Smogon: the other really active and out there guy, I mildly disagree with them on his way of posting reads, but that's about it for quibbles.
Skook: doesn't talk often, but when they do, I generally agree with what they're saying. Looks like they're paying close attention.
Fenrir: not much, but I like the analysis summary of previous pages.
HeaLnDeal: not rocking the boat much, their reads look okay. <neutral line>
jalmont: very little content and most of it is being defensive about it.
Cancerous: initial roleplaying rubbed me up the wrong way, which is probably on me. I feel like they're putting too much stock into the heury-clarinet connection without looking at other people much.
Heury: Reading back I noticed how many times they voted and they just seemed twitchy, OMGUS-ing at the slightest provocation. They also refused to answer some questions, initially just ignoring them.
Clarinet: I agree with Skook, that list of active players reads a bit like bait and I also don't like the "keep for D2" list.