Sorry if no conext [if context of an already existing opinion, or consistent answers, is the point than good for you], but..
I think question 1 flawed because I could consider LGPE flawed, but ORAS as not (or vice versa). The justification probably be if you liked the radical, super easy departure that LGPE was
Question 3 is a little flawed bc we should be talking about the games itself, not any smogon tier (also the 3 different options)
Question 4, using "not" is not recommended in questions
Question 7 is biased because you are asking Zamazenta first; it should be a choice between Zacian and Zamazenta, preferably (if the format makes this off ig i understand)\
Question 9 has the same problem as 7 but "sucks" provides a greater scale so i'll take it
Q14's can makes it amigious, of course they can but its if they do (this is really based on context bc i dont understand?_
Q15, again separate or combine both subjects to Defog sucks | stall sucks, or defog makes stall suck. bc i personally like defog change but indepent thoughts on stall
for the consistent agree/disagree you would just use the "agree" equiv (like zacian) as the agree