(Little) Things that annoy you in Pokémon

Here is a detail that annoys me plenty. The fact that some single staged Pokémon, like Luvdisc, Delibird, Stantler, Stunfisk, Pyukumuku, Volbeat + Illumise and especially Pika Clones have no business to be single stage due to weak stats or all-round mediocre.
Daily reminder that every creature collectible game needs bad entities and you can't just have only good monsters.

It's prolly the silliest of all unpopular opinions to desire that "every pokemon was good".
No, it's fine that on nearly 1000 Pokemon, we have a bunch of trashmons that are just cute/gimmicky and do nothing other than early route trash fodder or funny references.
 
Daily reminder that every creature collectible game needs bad entities and you can't just have only good monsters.

It's prolly the silliest of all unpopular opinions to desire that "every pokemon was good".
No, it's fine that on nearly 1000 Pokemon, we have a bunch of trashmons that are just cute/gimmicky and do nothing other than early route trash fodder or funny references.
Well....I dont disagree in concept, but feel like there's tiers of trashmon. I would say gen 4 was the last era of "this pokemon is just plain, almost unusable bad" and by this point we've transitioned to trashmon either being really gimmicky or just mediocre (or both!). You can pick a pokemon line from anywhere in gen 5-8 and they are almost certainly going to be more innately usable that any given earlier gen trashmon, even if the RNG gives you something without any stellar points.

You can even see this in the gimmick Pokemon, actually.
Unown? Horrible pokemon. 1 move, with variable type (& earlier gens, power) and the stats are bad.
Pyukumuku? Well...not an AMAZING pokemon by any means, but the stats work with what it wants to do, it has an interesting ability and it has a fully supportive movepool to try and do what it wants to do.
 
Not to mention that some of the trashmons are just there because Game Freak wants to show something off.

Unown shows formes, Spinda shows the spot generation algorithm, Chatot shows the recording feature (which is funny as it's the only gimmick mon to lose said gimmick), and so on. Some of the deliberate gimmicks are not THAT bad (see Sawsbuck and Malamar) but it's not their intention.

(Then there's the original Farfetch'd that was deliberately made to be bad)
 
(Then there's the original Farfetch'd that was deliberately made to be bad)
It was? I disagree, because I had great success with Farfetch'd in R/B. It always got boosted Exp. since it could only be obtained from a trade, which made it easy to train. Having access to Slash gave it a move with a base power of 210 which was very solid. Fly was good enough for secondary STAB, and then it could carry Cut as well since it didn't really have a lot of other great movepool options. From what I remember, it only really struggled against Rock-types. While Farfetch'd is not the greatest Pokémon ever, I don't agree about it being downright bad either. At least not in R/B, and I recall it being decent in FR/LG as well. In other games though... it wasn't as great, sadly. The last time I used one on an in-game team before Sword was in SoulSilver and it was pretty disappointing there, unfortunately.
 
It was? I disagree, because I had great success with Farfetch'd in R/B. It always got boosted Exp. since it could only be obtained from a trade, which made it easy to train. Having access to Slash gave it a move with a base power of 210 which was very solid. Fly was good enough for secondary STAB, and then it could carry Cut as well since it didn't really have a lot of other great movepool options. From what I remember, it only really struggled against Rock-types. While Farfetch'd is not the greatest Pokémon ever, I don't agree about it being downright bad either. At least not in R/B, and I recall it being decent in FR/LG as well. In other games though... it wasn't as great, sadly. The last time I used one on an in-game team before Sword was in SoulSilver and it was pretty disappointing there, unfortunately.
Behold, Pokémon that's great because of Slash is mostly great in Gen 1 and loses its greatness over time.
 
It was? I disagree, because I had great success with Farfetch'd in R/B. It always got boosted Exp. since it could only be obtained from a trade, which made it easy to train. Having access to Slash gave it a move with a base power of 210 which was very solid. Fly was good enough for secondary STAB, and then it could carry Cut as well since it didn't really have a lot of other great movepool options. From what I remember, it only really struggled against Rock-types. While Farfetch'd is not the greatest Pokémon ever, I don't agree about it being downright bad either. At least not in R/B, and I recall it being decent in FR/LG as well. In other games though... it wasn't as great, sadly. The last time I used one on an in-game team before Sword was in SoulSilver and it was pretty disappointing there, unfortunately.
From what I understand, Farfetch'd is designed to be worse than Fearow specifically. Because its inspiration refers to both a stroke of good luck and a gullible fool, it shows up as an in-game trade for a very common mon... but is worse than what you would get had you just stuck with Spearow. Fearow has all of its stats higher than Farfetch'd (even if that's only by 3 for its special), and gets Drill Peck and Hyper Beam that Farfetch'd doesn't.

Heck you could argue that Fetch'd not getting Hyper Beam itself shows an intent for it to be weaker than other fully-evolved mons.
 
There are so many retcons in Pokemon's history that I just audibly go "ugh" any time someone suggests the eviolite as a reason for not getting more evolutions.
the annoying part is, they make regional variants that get a new evolution. Yes, I get it. If something adapts to a new environment, then it's possible to evolve differently which can include further evolution. But the opposite can't be true because that would annoy more people and is not good advertising when you have, this is just an example, Galarian Magmar but that can't become a Magmortar.
 
the annoying part is, they make regional variants that get a new evolution. Yes, I get it. If something adapts to a new environment, then it's possible to evolve differently which can include further evolution. But the opposite can't be true because that would annoy more people and is not good advertising when you have, this is just an example, Galarian Magmar but that can't become a Magmortar.

Hilariously, I remember one of the fake Sword/Shield leaks said that many unpopular Gen IV evolutions of older Pokemon simply didn't exist in the game while their pre-evolutions remain, like Rhyperior.
 
Last edited:
I've always hated Zanzamenta and Zacian. Not just because they're some of the laziest legendary designs imo ("What's that, we need a legendary for Pokemon Sword and Shield? Screw it, dog with a sword" - some Pokemon designer probably), but I wholeheartedly believe they should've made the mascots a unicorn and lion

"Hey but isn't Solgaleo a lion legendary?" It sure is, and I severely wish they would've held off on the lion legendary for SWSH. It just fits far, far better with Britain seeing as how the royal coat of arms literally uses a lion and unicorn. It's not like they'd have to really reach with the design like with the dogs as well - a unicorn comes equipped with horn on its head, which can be easily turned into a sword while still feeling natural, unlike Zacian with its stupid sword it awkwardly holds in its mouth in an attempt to fit with the title of its game. And it's not that hard to turn a lion's mane into a shield

It's just a bit disappointing. I also think not making a Pokemon based on William Shakespeare or the British theatre in general was a huge oversight. I think Sobble would've been perfect for the role, but instead we got lizard James Bond with disgusting human hands

Also fun fact, apparently on the Coat of Arms the lion represents England and the unicorn represents Scotland. On the English coat of arms only the lion is wearing a crown, while on the Scottish one they both have a crown, which is pretty neat ig
 
I've always hated Zanzamenta and Zacian. Not just because they're some of the laziest legendary designs imo ("What's that, we need a legendary for Pokemon Sword and Shield? Screw it, dog with a sword" - some Pokemon designer probably)

Other way around, reportedly:

Immediately after the development of "Pokemon Sun Moon" was completed in the fall of 2016, several people, mainly Omori, began to devise the concept of the latest work of the "Pokemon" series. Since Nintendo Switch can be connected to a TV and played on a large screen, why not make Pokemon huge accordingly? I was thinking about the surprise element from the initial concept. Iwao, who was the director of "Pokemon Ultra Sun Ultra Moon", joined the project, and in September 2017, the project started in earnest. Why don't you have a sword and a shield as Pokemon to defeat a huge Pokemon? Omori decided the title from there.
(Translated with Google translate. I remember one of the early interviews also saying the names were chosen late into production, but couldn't find it.)
 
I was in the middle of a post about my mental association between swords/shields and arthropods when I noticed something that will forever bother me about Galar.

The Isle of Armor does not use the British spelling of "Armour." You had one job, GF: give the British region British names.

Isn't Nintendo of America in charge of the translation? If anything, it's them to blame.
 
To think there were rumors of several Pokemon going to get a Sword or Shield form. Sounds like Aegislash. Wish we got that instead of B I G Pokemon.
Honestly I am not expecting much of an improvement in design. I mean stats wise it can work. Sword Skarmory would be less bulky, but faster and stronk while Shield Salamence would be slow and has less attack but bulky.

But just from a design standpoint I don't want to imaging what they would do. Zamazenta and Zacian look dumb, and the Galarian Forms look artificial for the most part with few good designs.
Why is Mr Mime stepdancing? His name no longer fits what he was based on.

I am not a fan of regional variants in general, but Galarian forms are especially off putting. The great thing about Mega Evolution was, most of them were faithful to the original designs. Mega Charizard Y looks like it could belong to the Pokemon of Generation 1.
Mega Lucario looks like it could be a Gen 4 Pokemon.

Galarian Zigzagoon doesn't look like its from Gen 3. Yes, I know it's not a Hoenn Pokemon in Pokemon canon, but then you can argue the other way around that Zigzagoon from Hoenn doesn't fit Generation 8 design wise.
Yes, it's funny I say that considering it's just a pallet swap with the other variation pulling the tongue.
 
Mega Charizard Y looks like it could belong to the Pokemon of Generation 1.
heavily disagree there, most Megas are too overdesigned to fit the old design trends of gen 1-3. Gen 4 is when they started to experiment more with some detailed designs but it was kept mostly for the legendaries and the ugly cross evos (except you tangrowth love u mwah), so some Megas would still not really fit in. They fit way better with the gen 6 design trends
 
Why is Mr Mime stepdancing? His name no longer fits what he was based on.
Blame that on the english localizers, its Japanese name is simply "Barrierd", and while it had obvious mime influences it was not so overt to the point of legit having mime in its name. In fact with Screen Cleaner it's a more logical extension of the original concept than you give it credit for: OG Mr. Mime was all about setting up screens, its Galarian form is about removing them and other hazards with Rapid Spin, with this being reflected in a less literal sense by now being a "noisier" performing artist
 
To think there were rumors of several Pokemon going to get a Sword or Shield form. Sounds like Aegislash. Wish we got that instead of B I G Pokemon.

Actually, the big rumor that persisted in many fake leaks was not swords and shields, but armor. Armored Pokemon were heavily rumored to be the next Mega/Z-Move, the biggest thing that started it was the CGI remake of the first Pokemon move heavily redesigning Mewtwo's armor from the early parts of the movie, for seemingly no reason(and as we all know now it actually really was for no reason).
 
I don't actually mind both legendaries being wolves, but I just wish their weapons were incorporated better. Maybe its too edgy/violent, but I think a zacian/zamazenta design with it being stabbed by the sword/shield would be pretty cool and also have a lot of lore opportunities
Definitely some edge/violence concerns there, but that would work well with the dogs being based of King Arthur stuff. The idea a dog getting a legendary sword stuck into them and then becoming a legendary is pretty pog. Or is the dog already a legendary and it just happens to have a sword? We'll never know because GF is lazy and can't give us a cool Wolf Excalibur Sword design


To think there were rumors of several Pokemon going to get a Sword or Shield form. Sounds like Aegislash. Wish we got that instead of B I G Pokemon.
Honestly I am not expecting much of an improvement in design. I mean stats wise it can work. Sword Skarmory would be less bulky, but faster and stronk while Shield Salamence would be slow and has less attack but bulky.

But just from a design standpoint I don't want to imaging what they would do. Zamazenta and Zacian look dumb, and the Galarian Forms look artificial for the most part with few good designs.
Why is Mr Mime stepdancing? His name no longer fits what he was based on.

I am not a fan of regional variants in general, but Galarian forms are especially off putting. The great thing about Mega Evolution was, most of them were faithful to the original designs. Mega Charizard Y looks like it could belong to the Pokemon of Generation 1.
Mega Lucario looks like it could be a Gen 4 Pokemon.

Galarian Zigzagoon doesn't look like its from Gen 3. Yes, I know it's not a Hoenn Pokemon in Pokemon canon, but then you can argue the other way around that Zigzagoon from Hoenn doesn't fit Generation 8 design wise.
Yes, it's funny I say that considering it's just a pallet swap with the other variation pulling the tongue.

Oh legit? Different forms based off the different versions could be cool ig, but not as a main mechanic like Dynamax

I don't really understand why the regional forms 'not fitting' is a bad thing though. Would you want these new regional forms based off an entirely different culture from halfway across the world to look almost exactly like their originals, like Kantonian and Alolan Diglett? Using your example of Galarian Zigzagoon, of course it doesn't look like it'd fit in with Hoenn. It's based off something entirely different to Zigzagoon - Glam Rock bands, most likely KISS - which isn't something you'd find in Japan. They're designed around and for different environments, and kinda just use the originals as a base, but I don't think them looking different from their counterparts is necessarily a bad thing

Honestly I really like a lot of Galarian forms because of the attention to detail regarding British history and culture. Yeah Galarian Mr Mime is a little weak, I agree, but Mr Rime is based of famous silent film actor Charlie Chaplain; Perrserker is based off Vikings; Sirfetch'd is a Knight; Runerigus looks a lot like Ingvar runestones and Galarian Rapidash exists ig

It's fair enough if you don't like them, but saying they're bad just because they don't look like they came from games that were released years ago is a bit strange to me
 
Definitely some edge/violence concerns there, but that would work well with the dogs being based of King Arthur stuff. The idea a dog getting a legendary sword stuck into them and then becoming a legendary is pretty pog. Or is the dog already a legendary and it just happens to have a sword? We'll never know because GF is lazy and can't give us a cool Wolf Excalibur Sword design

you could probably do multiple ways, depending on how the lore goes, but I always felt like it'd be cool if, instead of just having weapons because "idk they have it", they were more connected to it lorewise. kinda like that myth of the sword in the stone but instead of a stone, its this wolf. a guardian of a legendary weapon made by uuuh pokemon version of king arthur i guess lol

unknown.png


though I wouldn't elaborate much bc of the rules, this is just my main response to my dislike of the current dogs tbh
 
Back
Top