Thunderpunch being SE against Rayquaza ? :D Surpriiiiise
Ehhhh...
Groudon in Gen 3 kinda would have a bad time
View attachment 511512
Can't use Stab since...Flying is immune. Only SE move is Ancient Power and Thunderpunch, and it's not a special attacker. Rayquaza meanwhile...
View attachment 511513
Outspeeds, has Ice, Water, AND Grass coverage, Groudon has to pray for a high range crit for Ancient Power
Kyogre meanwhile...
View attachment 511514
Ice Beam alone off its SpA will kill the dwagon, even at max bulk Ray dies
View attachment 511516
Further proving that Kyogre is better than Groudon
"But wait, what about later gens?"
Well, Primal Groudon now has
-Precipace Blades...doing 0 cuz it's a ground move
-Thundermiss
-Stonemiss
...and now a weakness to EQ from Mega Ray
View attachment 511518
But hey, that's better than Gen 3
Primal Kyogre meanwhile doesn't care. Ice, ice, baby~
View attachment 511517
#TeamAquaSweep
Dunno if you want to clear this up, but at first the way this was worded made me think you were saying Ancient Power was a Special attack in gen 3.Can't use Stab since...Flying is immune. Only SE move is Ancient Power and Thunderpunch, and it's not a special attacker.
Ancient Power is still 60 BP, which isn’t helpful as a coverage move due to BP too low to be effective by the time Level 30 or higher is reached, and the Weather Trio will be level 45 or higher by the time of being fought and caught.Dunno if you want to clear this up, but at first the way this was worded made me think you were saying Ancient Power was a Special attack in gen 3.
Groudon also has Rock Slide in Gen 3 though?Ehhhh...
Groudon in Gen 3 kinda would have a bad time
View attachment 511512
Can't use Stab since...Flying is immune. Only SE move is Ancient Power and Thunderpunch, and it's not a special attacker. Rayquaza meanwhile...
View attachment 511513
Outspeeds, has Ice, Water, AND Grass coverage, Groudon has to pray for a high range crit for Ancient Power
Kyogre meanwhile...
View attachment 511514
Ice Beam alone off its SpA will kill the dwagon, even at max bulk Ray dies
View attachment 511516
Further proving that Kyogre is better than Groudon
"But wait, what about later gens?"
Well, Primal Groudon now has
-Precipace Blades...doing 0 cuz it's a ground move
-Thundermiss
-Stonemiss
...and now a weakness to EQ from Mega Ray
View attachment 511518
But hey, that's better than Gen 3
Primal Kyogre meanwhile doesn't care. Ice, ice, baby~
View attachment 511517
#TeamAquaSweep
Red was a time traveler from 2019 when you can access the PC from anywhere in the world (including the equivalent of on top of Mt. Fuji) or 2022 when he just had a really good Poketch?
You know, we only ever looked at Mt. Silver from the south side, what if there was actually a more pleasant way up from the north side?
Or Red was training and got stranded after a rockslide (which is why you needed Rock Climb) and has been living off of melted snow and actually murdered Pokémon meat for the last years.Red is a genius lets be real.
Jynx (RB/FRLG) could've easily been placed in the Seafoam Islands as it originally was in the Japanese version.
No actually (why!?). Gen 4 on it's TM only at leastGroudon also has Rock Slide in Gen 3 though?
A bit irrelevant at this point (per the calcs), but Groudon gets Rock Slide via Move Tutor in both FRLG & EmeraldNo actually (why!?). Gen 4 on it's TM only at least
...sadly not OHKO even with Ray having no bulk investment....
View attachment 511638
So either Stone miss...or that's it
Edit: this assumes no items/hazards. Obviously Groudon would favor better with those (especially Stealth Rock)
Kyogre still better though
Also asymmetrical version exclusives e.g. Seviper being found in both Sapphire and Emerald while Zangoose could only be found in Ruby. Yes I'm specifically mad about this one.
It's not strictly asymmetrical though because it's specifically balanced out by Lunatone and Solrock having the same setup - Lunatone is only in Sapphire while Solrock is in both Ruby and Emerald. Yeah it sucks if you didn't play Ruby, but it... sucks equally for those who didn't play Sapphire (though I do really like Zangoose so I share your pain)
However this does remind me of something that's always irritated me about those two - there's a Collector in the Hoenn games on Route 115 who brags "check it out, I've got a rare Pokemon!" He has one Pokemon on his team: in (Omega) Ruby he has a Seviper, while in (Alpha) Sapphire he has a Zangoose, making his claim actually completely accurate - being version-exclusives, they're beyond rare in the titles they're not in, practically mythical in fact. He's notable for being one of a very few ordinary NPCs to have a different team based on the version, which is cool.
So how did Emerald handle this? Well, since Zangoose is absent from Emerald you'd think he'd just have that - but no, he has both. Stupid.
Another better solution would have been for the collector to use one of the mons that is available in both Ruby and Sapphire but not Emerald i.e. Meditite/Medicham, Surskit/Masquerain, or Roselia.It's not strictly asymmetrical though because it's specifically balanced out by Lunatone and Solrock having the same setup - Lunatone is only in Sapphire while Solrock is in both Ruby and Emerald. Yeah it sucks if you didn't play Ruby, but it... sucks equally for those who didn't play Sapphire (though I do really like Zangoose so I share your pain)
However this does remind me of something that's always irritated me about those two - there's a Collector in the Hoenn games on Route 115 who brags "check it out, I've got a rare Pokemon!" He has one Pokemon on his team: in (Omega) Ruby he has a Seviper, while in (Alpha) Sapphire he has a Zangoose, making his claim actually completely accurate - being version-exclusives, they're beyond rare in the titles they're not in, practically mythical in fact. He's notable for being one of a very few ordinary NPCs to have a different team based on the version, which is cool.
So how did Emerald handle this? Well, since Zangoose is absent from Emerald you'd think he'd just have that - but no, he has both. Stupid.
You’re not alone on this. Swagger was pretty harmful for competitive as much as in-game due to +2 Attack making confusion damage even more severe, since confusion damage deals physical damage to the victim, instead of a set damage.off topic to what everyone else is saying but i really hate the move swagger
All the mobile games. As much as I love this franchise, it’s difficult to look away.
I would assume they're referring to the absolutely insane amount of mobile titles ripe with microtransactions that use the Pokemon Franchise.Can you elaborate on this at all?
I would assume they're referring to the absolutely insane amount of mobile titles ripe with microtransactions that use the Pokemon Franchise.
Something I myself really don't like considering kids are the ones most likely to interact with them, and also the ones most likely to be preys to the mtx without even realizing it. But heh, asian companies aren't exactly known for their ethics when it comes to mobile and predatory mtxs.
You're not wrong, but it won't stop me (and some others) from cringing at Nintendo letting that specific brand be used for this purpose. I don't mind the random Genshin, Honkai ,Diablo, Candy Crush or whatever bigtiddyanime doing it, I kinda cringe however when it's a brand famous for being targetted at vulnerable peopleI mean thats literally every mobile game. If the kids are spending money, whether it being the parents (i.e not locking up their cards etc. when giving their phone to kids) or the kids who have their own money and are old enough to make the decision i.e teenagers. Its their own fault really. And the parents for failing to educate them about it.
I mean thats literally every mobile game. If the kids are spending money, whether it being the parents (i.e not locking up their cards etc. when giving their phone to kids) or the kids who have their own money and are old enough to make the decision i.e teenagers. Its their own fault really. And the parents for failing to educate them about it.
While we wait for a potential clarification, I will agree with this statement.Having formerly worked in the gambling industry, I'm not entirely in sympathy with the stance that "if you spend money on this it's your own fault" but that's a conversation for another day.