Pinkacross 's team is a good example of taking a niche mon and making it work. You don't just slap things on and wonder why it doesn't work. Anyways, nice job pinka :)
I don't think it will rise to OU, but that would be cool if it did.
widespread enough, frequent enough,
what's the competitive value in keeping anything? what do you consider competitively valuable? isn't that completely arbitrary?I would ask you "What is the competitive value in keeping focus band?"
Could you stop condescending to absolutely everyone who tries to interact with you every single time? And maybe perhaps even try to answer the questions that are being asked of you instead of dodging them because you clearly don't have an argument?what's the competitive value in keeping anything? what do you consider competitively valuable? isn't that completely arbitrary?
Could you stop condescending to absolutely everyone who tries to interact with you every single time? And maybe perhaps even try to answer the questions that are being asked of you instead of dodging them because you clearly don't have an argument?
Anyways, I genuinely can't believe we're arguing about Sleep Clause here. Unless you're arguing in favour of Sleep Moves Clause instead of the current implementation, you're arguing in favour of objectively one of the worst mechanics in the game being completely unrestricted and forcing every single team to have a sleeper (preferably a spore mon). What the fuck has possessed this community as of late that we're genuinely arguing about whether or not shit like the fundamental, basic rules that make this game even remotely playable in a competitive context should stay around?
If you want to go play worse metagames with objectively uncompetitive bullshit like Evasion/OHKO moves, go play BSS or VGC. We have standards around here.
What alteration could you possibly make that would be fair and 100% cartridge accurate? If you want to ban any move that causes sleep, fair enough- but Sleep Clause as it stands is as good as you're going to get.Quite literally nobody advocating for the change in sleep clause think it is acceptable entirely free. Most of us are either advocating for an alteration to be possibly cartridge accurate, or banning sleep moves.
What alteration could you possibly make that would be fair and 100% cartridge accurate? If you want to ban any move that causes sleep, fair enough- but Sleep Clause as it stands is as good as you're going to get.
I don't believe cart accuracy is very important at all. Who the fuck cares? No one plays on cart because it takes too long and there's a 20 minute timer that makes Singles impossible to play. Should we slow down the animations to be cart accurate too? And include that stupid ass timer?
The way I see it, Sleep Clause is being argued about less so because people think it's outright awful and more so because the way it exists currently presents a horribly contradictory take on (what I personally consider to be) one of the core tentants of competitive Singles on Smogon-that being cart accurate play from the convenience of an online simulator-by literally breaking it's rules outright, and, on top of that, changes to other controversial elements are being dissuaded on the same exact line of thinking it compromises almost entirely free of scrutiny.Could you stop condescending to absolutely everyone who tries to interact with you every single time? And maybe perhaps even try to answer the questions that are being asked of you instead of dodging them because you clearly don't have an argument?
Anyways, I genuinely can't believe we're arguing about Sleep Clause here. Unless you're arguing in favour of Sleep Moves Clause instead of the current implementation, you're arguing in favour of objectively one of the worst mechanics in the game being completely unrestricted and forcing every single team to have a sleeper (preferably a spore mon). What the fuck has possessed this community as of late that we're genuinely arguing about whether or not shit like the fundamental, basic rules that make this game even remotely playable in a competitive context should stay around?
If you want to go play worse metagames with objectively uncompetitive bullshit like Evasion/OHKO moves, go play BSS or VGC. We have standards around here.
Okay. That changes nothing about my actual argument. Showdown already has elements that are cart inaccurate (i.e. not being slow as molasses, not having a constantly ticking timer that does nothing but make the game worse), should those be changed to be accurate to the cart too?There is no longer a 20 minute timer, it's been extended to a max of 1 hour
I just don't see how cart accuracy matters in cases like this. OU is, for 99% of interactions, perfectly cart accurate. Why does this one, somewhat niche interaction matter? No one plays on cart and the situations where Sleep Clause being a mod matters pretty much come down to Sneasler and accidentally clicking Spore/Yawn.The way I see it, Sleep Clause is being argued about less so because people think it's outright awful and more so because the way it exists currently presents a horribly contradictory take on (what I personally consider to be) one of the core tentants of competitive Singles on Smogon-that being cart accurate play from the convenience of an online simulator-by literally breaking it's rules outright, and, on top of that, changes to other controversial elements are being dissuaded on the same exact line of thinking it compromises almost entirely free of scrutiny.
This is irrelevant to whether or not they are uncompetitive, which is an objective truth that really isn't up for debate. I don't know why VGC fans are so defensive about acknowledging their metagame has objectively uncompetitive elements to it despite those elements not being completely metagame ruining. Anyways, as Finch said, this isn't really the place to be discussing this as it isn't relevant to our metagame at all.Also, Evasion has always been a middling to bad gimmick in VGC. An OHKO move was considered viable on a singular Pokemon for all of one tournament this gen before people took it for the shitty meme it was and stopped bothering by the next, too. Saying to go to VGC to "play a worse meta with uncompetitive bullshit" like that stuff just strikes me as a wholly ignorant write-off of the format at large tbh.
And that 1% of interactions can create literal win/loss scenarios based on game states that're 100% non-replicable on the literal basis for the entire format (aka the actual goddamn game), and with how many games are played on Showdown daily I'd imagine that 1% ends up rearing it's ugly head far more often than you'd think either wayI just don't see how cart accuracy matters in cases like this. OU is, for 99% of interactions, perfectly cart accurate. Why does this one, somewhat niche interaction matter? No one plays on cart and the situations where Sleep Clause being a mod matters pretty much come down to Sneasler and accidentally clicking Spore/Yawn.
Less so denying that they're uncompetitive and more so pushing back against the idea that someone who feels they want to use them should go into it expecting them to be effective or worthwhile to build around (and your loaded language certainly didn't help in that regard).This is irrelevant to whether or not they are uncompetitive, which is an objective truth that really isn't up for debate. I don't know why VGC fans are so defensive about acknowledging their metagame has objectively uncompetitive elements to it despite those elements not being completely metagame ruining.
that one wasn't even condescending, it was a genuine question and i was trying to de-escalate. is it not subjective what a given person considers valuable to a competitive game? isn't that part of the reason why "competitive value" doesn't factor into tiering policy?Could you stop condescending to absolutely everyone who tries to interact with you every single time? And maybe perhaps even try to answer the questions that are being asked of you instead of dodging them because you clearly don't have an argument?
everyone who's arguing against sleep clause is arguing for sleep moves clause to replace it. no one here is seriously asking for unclaused sleep. for the record, i believe sleep clause is fine as it is—banning an entire status condition would be going too far, the precedent is sound, there's no pressing reason to change it (dire claw is not a pressing reason—or even a particularly good move, for that matter, i run gunk shot these days), and cart play is fucking garbage anyway. at least i can play showdown without having to worry about it randomly crashing mid-battleAnyways, I genuinely can't believe we're arguing about Sleep Clause here. Unless you're arguing in favour of Sleep Moves Clause instead of the current implementation, you're arguing in favour of objectively one of the worst mechanics in the game being completely unrestricted and forcing every single team to have a sleeper (preferably a spore mon). What the fuck has possessed this community as of late that we're genuinely arguing about whether or not shit like the fundamental, basic rules that make this game even remotely playable in a competitive context should stay around?
If you want to go play worse metagames with objectively uncompetitive bullshit like Evasion/OHKO moves, go play BSS or VGC. We have standards around here.
I envy the idyllic utopian society in the alternate universe this was posted from.Man I miss hazards. Why did y'all ban em?
To get back on track I pose the following question to redirect discourse: who do you think will be dropping and rising at the end of the month? Have you been surprised by seeing or not seeing much of a certain mon?
For me even though I'm low ladder I'm astounded at the lack of H-Samu's presence ever since Gliscor arrived. Also will miss Empoleon once it inevitably falls.
I mean, I don’t blame people for wanting to discuss anything other than the Gen 9 metagame tbh.I am not reading a single post in this weird, tangential debate that has hardly anything to do with the current metagame. I advise we all move on.
Ong Gen 9 OU discussions lately have been pretty meaningless lately. We are just arguing over what should be banned and whatnot without any real meaningful development. Or debating sleep clause for some reason, and the occasional shitpost. The icing on the cake is how toxic everything has gotten. I don't think there is much reason to check the forums until the Moon suspect is over.I mean, I don’t blame people for wanting to discuss anything other than the Gen 9 metagame tbh.
We talkin about sleep clause while Gliscor is ruining this tier
![]()
Time for me to talk about the survey results.I am hoping to (and working on) formalizing write-ups of a survey results post which includes not just this past one, but also comparing some scores across multiple recent surveys.
I did promise I would disclose results from this past survey this week and while I paraphrased them on discord and in a prior post, I wanted to formally make them known (note these are all qualified, but there was only one big outlier with the general):
This was a large part of why Roaring Moon was suspected and reflects how problematic Pokemon like GLiscor are regarded as throughout circles of higher level players. Obviously there is not much difference between a 3.39 and a 3.37; even a 3.39 and a 3.22 are within the margin of error.
- Roaring Moon was a 3.68 / 5
- Gliscor was a 3.39 / 5
- Manaphy was a 3.37 / 5
- Kingambit was a 3.28 / 5
- Ogerpon-Wellspring was a 3.22 / 5
- Gholdengo was a 3.11 / 5
- Sneasler was a 2.22 / 5
You've got a point, my man. Personally, I'm thinking we kick sleep to the curb. The current OU scene is just chaotic – non-stop broken sweepers, hazards everywhere, and good luck finding any solid defense. Tera's in the mix, making things wild. Honestly, who's got the time to bother with this Gen outside of the council? It's a whole mood.I mean, I don’t blame people for wanting to discuss anything other than the Gen 9 metagame tbh.
Have you considered Tera Flying as an alternative for this set? The way I see it, it kinda compresses a lot of things you want to do. It's no longer weak to MIR/Iron Head, grass moves from Boom (and breloom please guys breloom is viable please!!!!!), ground moves from Gliscor/Tusk, and we don't really have a lot of good ice or rock moves that can threaten it, especially behind veil. It gives it a nasty weakness to rocks, but in exchange you gain an immunity to spikes, probably the more prevalent hazard, and you're not probably switching this back in after its tera'd anyway. It just feels like on a veil team you want a Tera with less weaknesses rather than more resistances that fairy/water give you, and this seems the best as a jack-of-all-trades.obviously with alolan ninetails everywhere we've seen all manner of setup sweepers try their luck. Garg will be making a comeback to OU as a serious abuser of veil with curse. Iron defense used to be the better set as it got the ball rolling quickly and you could heal off damage but its no longer necessary, which allows you to fight back against ghost types with sub.
@ Leftovers
Ability: Purifying Salt
Tera Type: Water/fairy
EVs: 252 HP / 136 Def / 120 SpD
Impish Nature
- Curse
- Salt Cure
- Recover
- Body Press
252+ Atk Choice Band Rillaboom Wood Hammer vs. +1 252 HP / 136+ Def Garganacl in Grassy Terrain with an ally's Aurora Veil: 178-210 (44 - 51.9%) -- guaranteed 3HKO after Leftovers recovery and Grassy Terrain recovery
choice band rillaboom will literally kill itself with recoil before it kills you. "but it will tera grass" you say. okay just tera garg/ swap to moltres
+2 252+ Atk Kingambit Iron Head vs. +1 252 HP / 136+ Def Garganacl with an ally's Aurora Veil: 129-153 (31.9 - 37.8%) -- 0.2% chance to 3HKO after Leftovers recovery
the only issue garg faces from being a broken setup sweeper is ivy cudgels high crit chance which will OHKO you if you remain a rock type. do watch out for that. and be aware of encore users.