Literally none of the three examples you cited are ‘incorrect information’. But I do appreciate people actually reading my posts and trying so ty.
1. Neon making a sheet like that still feels towny to me. No I haven’t played with him before and you can argue it is NAI because he always makes sheets but his energy in updating it and constantly sharing it still feels towny to me. Plus he’s now the confirmed announcer and thus pretty much confirmed town via role so what exactly are you arguing here? That I should’ve backed off my (objectively correct) town read? Bizarre take.
2. She literally said ‘I am not giving reads D1’, that is an objective fact. No idea what you’re talking about re. A Fairy. And yes I still slight scumread her although now that you mention it my reasoning has changed so I’m glad you asked about it. Originally it was based on her seeming purposefully unhelpful, but now it’s because a significant portion of the game (including you) seem to like referencing Fairy but not actually pressuring / calling her out or reading her one way or the other. It is strange how many people just want to like co-exist with her without interacting and that reads like scumbuddy distancing to me.
3. Go back and re-read the post you quoted because I literally did not say that I scumread AG for the danger of being voted (although he wasn’t at end of day anyway so not only are you wrong on my justification you’re wrong on the objective facts as well), I said that it’s weird he would still use the mayor to try to save someone when it is a limited resource and based on his own posts he didn’t have strong feelings between the two vote options. You know, exactly the opposite of the straw man justification you tried to claim I made.
It is weird to me that you’re like trying to pressure me by just making up things I never said. I do want people reading my posts more closely though because it’s been incredibly frustrating and demoralizing feeling like unless I actively spam the thread people ignore my reads.
My scum reads at this moment are:
1. AG based solely on the fact that his role does not feel town to me, and his usage of it was strange - just doesn’t make any sense why town AG would pop a limited shot on Day 1 at end of day (I.e. he would have cancelled using it if he were town and had no stakes in the final vote, as he claimed). That being said his posting does feel towny and his role is proven, so I’m feeling this vote less and less.
2. Fairy. Hated their posting style all game (sort of active lurking under the radar), while literally everyone in this game is keeping a distance from her. If you think about it pretty much the only person in this entire game who has taken a hard stance on her is me. She has no many potential scum pairings that probabilistically she is more likely scum than average even if you don’t buy any of her behavior being strange.
3. Rostam due to the Jalmont evidence. I actually don’t hate Rostam’s posting in general but I buy Blazade’s role based arguments and the post I quoted was a completely awful one riddled with factually untrue things.
Town I still feel good about Realiti and im coming around to the HydrogenHydreigon read that others have made. This is on top of ImaginaryNeon who via role I think is obviously lock town. I’m probably going to base who I vote today heavily on who these three are voting.
Blazade and Celever could go either way but I still town lean both of them.
Ehmcee we haven’t talked about much due to the vig claim but I will point out it is a little sus of a claim given it has ‘the same flavor as the mafia kill’. Obviously I would never vote this slot until we get more info and if we see two kills with mafia flavor then we can confirm this role very easily, I’m just not ready to put them in lock town due to role until I see the proof.
realiti did you comment on the Jalmont / Rostam thing anywhere and I missed it? What’re your thoughts on them vs. Pulsar vs. AG? Also what’re your thoughts on other scumreads / towncore?
