i think letter grades themselves are fine, but the percentages the grading system uses are extremely fucked. so i propose we use a grading system that has the percentages spread out equally to make actual sense:
a: 100% to 80% (≥95% is a+, ≤85% is a-)
b: 79.999…% to 60% (≥75% is b+, ≤65% is b-)
c: 59.999…% to 40% (≥55% is c+, ≤45% is c-)
d: 39.999…% to 20% (≥35% is d+, ≤25% is d-)
f: 19.999…% to 0% (≥15% is f+, ≤5% is f-)
under this system, tusk's score from your analysis would put it at a c-, hatterene at a c+, and cinderace at a high b-
This is a great idea, thanks man! Additionally, it was suggested to me on Discord that I also multiply by usage stats to grade based on different facets of the meta/Pokemon movesets. I'm gonna take this info and the Discord info and further improve the chart grade system - I'll try to use it again ASAP when I find a discussion or debate situation that needs it (I'm also coming up with an additional resource thread idea which I'm hoping to post before the new year, but it might have to wait until 2024 depending on my schedule).
I have literally spent dozens of my hours changing the structure of OU to be transparent and based off of public data rather than just a small council chat behind closed doors. You have no clue what you’re talking about. Smogon OU is less elitist now than ever.
Your posts did not reflect the reality of the metagame and this thread has tendencies to go into wild tangents — as we saw with the lock yesterday. I am trying to prevent that from happening again. Going out of your way to take shots that couldn’t be further from the truth is just being an ass.
I'd like to also bring up that, in my however many years on Smogon at this point (essentially since Gen 5), Gen 9 has been the LEAST elitist out of all of the generations and is a very welcoming community right now - communication between staff, contribs, users, etc. has been at comparatively seamless levels, and the surveys are doing great and people (myself included) really enjoy them. People have overall been accepting of fringe opinions as long as they're backed up with functional data (whether it be huge posts like my sub-OU analysis works, along with other analysis works like replay analysis, tourney plays, group research projects, etc). From what I've seen and felt, Smogon's in quite a nice spot right now - more so than in the past in my opinion.
If Smogon were as elitist as was claimed, then all of my big posts, and many other posts by many others for that matter, would have been laughed out of the room - but there's been great back-and-forth dialogue throughout the generation so far, and I really hope to see it continue because this is the most fun I've had interacting with the competitive community since Gen 5's weather wars (still love that meta).
Last edited: