And people use meow + kyurem because it’s what they’re comfortable with. There are many other Pokémon/team structures that are viable now as well, and just because people are gravitating towards meow + kyurem right now does not imply a healthy meta game. The same was the Berlin being used a dozen times on top play didn’t imply chess is broken. That is the main point I’m trying to make, let me give you an example through.I don’t agree with you about chess. There are so many viable openings in chess, that it is literally up to what opening you like the best. (Within reason don’t go off playing the grob lol.) The reason Anand and Magnus keep playing the Berlin is that is what they are comfortable with and have the most experience with. Furthermore I also disagree with you about overcentralizing metagames being normal. There are more examples of wide open metagames, like in the Pokémon tcg there have been formats where there were so many good decks that you just chose the one you were comfortable with and stick with it. I think it really comes down to what overcentralizing means. For me, it’s when only a couple mons are good and viable. That’s definitely not healthy. My take is that there is a wide variety of mons that can do well in this format: so the meta isn’t even overcentralized in the first place.
would you agree, that Ttar in Adv Is over centralizing? I certainly would, however you still don’t see Ttar on every single team and the meta is still healthy so what’s the issue? This meta is certainly centralized to an extent if tusk or gambit sits at %40 usage, I’m just saying that’s not a big deal and it will always end up this way. I think the priority should be making a meta that is skill based and not purely reliant on matchup.
if all Pokémon tcg decks are equally viable and you can “pick whatever you want” then how come they have a tiering system like we do where certain decks are S rank? Like what you said just isn’t true tbh.