NOC Pokemon Mystery Dungeon Mafia - Explorers - Game Thread (Game Over!)

Shane the Shroomish said:
can you find where this happened so i can read it again?
Click to expand...
I provided examples in a recent post of their strongarming shared views but no rn I don’t wanna dig for examples of it tbh. A significant proportion of their posts are just talking to each other though, and they’ve both tried to push me twice today (once right after I voted Laurel and also rn while I was asleep) Dx
 
Celever said:
I provided examples in a recent post of their strongarming shared views but no rn I don’t wanna dig for examples of it tbh. A significant proportion of their posts are just talking to each other though, and they’ve both tried to push me twice today (once right after I voted Laurel and also rn while I was asleep) Dx
Click to expand...
translation to readable english: just iso him lol
 
If I get into a situation where I start repeating myself it usually doom spirals into an argument cos I get frustrated ftr so we’re trying the “it’s in the thread, you can find it!” approach x3
 
Celever said:
I provided examples in a recent post of their strongarming shared views but no rn I don’t wanna dig for examples of it tbh. A significant proportion of their posts are just talking to each other though, and they’ve both tried to push me twice today (once right after I voted Laurel and also rn while I was asleep) Dx
Click to expand...
i remember them pushing you for voting laurel but I didn't think anything weird of it, I'll try to find them and read it again
 
Celever said:
That thread dynamic is that the game was way too stagnant for halfway through D1. Adding another 1 vote just adds to that stagnation, whereas pushing someone to 2 (and who has actually been scummy) has a higher likelihood of changing things up a bit. Which is kinda did because I was very randomly pushed for it (lmao?????) so gaming ig
Click to expand...
Anyway on that note, bluedoom I eagerly await your reply to the one thing I have repeated this game cos you expressly made me to which you have just gone back to lurking with your vote on me :boi:
 
Shane the Shroomish said:
i remember them pushing you for voting laurel but I didn't think anything weird of it, I'll try to find them and read it again
Click to expand...
It was specifically for voting Laurel instead of either of them, cos I scumread both of them so much harder than Laurel, but at that time I… didn’t. I just commented on their buddying a bit
 
Celever said:
It was specifically for voting Laurel instead of either of them, cos I scumread both of them so much harder than Laurel, but at that time I… didn’t. I just commented on their buddying a bit
Click to expand...
i can certainly understand why that's frustrating for you but you calling it open buddying just feels like an overly defensive misrep, i don't see why they couldn't come to those conclusions independently

i havant really viewed any two people in this thread as pushing a cohesive narrative, i think the reads lists have varied in shape and size well enough

i didn't like jalmonts reads list that much either but throwing him into some sort of bilderberg group isn't exactly an enticing argument to follow (and I think it's absurd to imply he's overtly trying to influence the game given all of the naked votes he's made), it just makes me question your motives
 
but that read from clouds at at least consistent with his early read on Flanders, he gets pinged by people not behaving as he thinks they should based on the words they're saying, i read that as him trying out a new style of read which i came around to being towny, i didn't find either instance persuasive though
 
Shane the Shroomish said:
i can certainly understand why that's frustrating for you but you calling it open buddying just feels like an overly defensive misrep, i don't see why they couldn't come to those conclusions independently

i havant really viewed any two people in this thread as pushing a cohesive narrative, i think the reads lists have varied in shape and size well enough

i didn't like jalmonts reads list that much either but throwing him into some sort of bilderberg group isn't exactly an enticing argument to follow (and I think it's absurd to imply he's overtly trying to influence the game given all of the naked votes he's made), it just makes me question your motives
Click to expand...
Nah that’s not the only one. There’s also deciding you’re scum for posting a wallpost once, deciding Neon is clear when he isn’t, deciding pulsar is scum because of a claim in a game with safeclaims, and then also a fair bit of consensus on slots like genisu. It’s more than that occasion
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top