NOC Pokemon Mystery Dungeon Mafia - Explorers - Game Thread (Game Over!)

This reads like scum. Let me explain:


This is cool and based, thanks for letting us know why you changed. Kinda undermines one of my original reasons for scumleaning you tbh


This is hilariously contrived, and I think these are fake scumreads to divert attention from real scum. Saber is an entirely new player in his second game who's just trying to figure stuff out as he goes along. If a certain approach got him killed last time, he'll try a different approach for the sake of survival (which has always explicitly been his priority). That just makes sense. As for Alice, last game she was extremely inactive in the first 24-36h and ramped up after that. You surely must know this if you're feeling confident enough to post a scumread on her, in which case you're just misrepresenting how she played last game for the sake of pinning something on her.


This is getting weird. I've been tinfoiling a genisu - bluedoom - JALMONT scum trio dynamic for a while for various reasons, but the JALMONT segment was always the weakest bc you didn't have a readlist yet. Now you do, and you have townread bluedoom and genisu. Genisu TRed you and bluedoom, and bluedoom TRed (or TLed I guess who cares) you and genisu. It's also worth noting that Bluedoom didn't bother explaining genisu much, and left himself an out to change his mind on you later. Similarly, genisu didn't give any reasoning for listing you and bluedoom as his ONLY townreads, and now you gloss over bluedoom (seemingly wanting it to go unnoticed compared to other reads) and use the LHF explanation I basically handed you to justify genisu. It could just be a legitimate towncore forming between you three because you trust each other, but I heavily doubt that since both you and bluedoom have made a point of warning against forming solid D1 "towncores", plus bluedoom also hedged his TR on you. That leaves two options: a cosmic coincidence (which I heavily doubt), or a scumteam subtly covering for each other while focusing more posts and words on flashier issues like the pulsar and laurel incidents.


We've been over this, flavor doesn't mean nearly as much as we thought. The pulsar incident demonstrated that, and multiple people besides that (myself included) have claimed that their flavor doesn't correspond to their actual roles at all. Thus, this feels like an impure switch on a previous TR. Not sure what that means for wider strategy but it'll be interesting to watch.
mate you really have to stop tunneling and take a look at the big picture
 
was i tagged because ive played pmd? magnezone is the head policeman lmao

regardless mafia has safeclaims, so this is redundant, we know every player has a town role pm so getting on someones back for not having a role pm thats towny is by default a bad avenue

pulsar can be voted for other reasons though, imo
maybe magnezone is her real mon, and barista is her fake claim
 
I still don't understand how barista is a "role" unless it's "fruit vendor at home." I'm inclined to say it's worth a vote tbh. I may switch over later.

I'm inclined to also say no to jalmont d1. We massclaim d2 and we solve him from there. I feel like I can have a better read on him based on his posts based on his role.
 
I still don't understand how barista is a "role" unless it's "fruit vendor at home." I'm inclined to say it's worth a vote tbh. I may switch over later.

I'm inclined to also say no to jalmont d1. We massclaim d2 and we solve him from there. I feel like I can have a better read on him based on his posts based on his role.
Ayyyyyy, M2H pushed for massclaim! Got one for my bingo card
 
you're advocating massclaim in the game where scum are given safe roles to claim

Safe claims are still usually not verifiable. E.g. if somebody's safe claims is "town bpv" but they have an action we kill it. Not d1 so any potential alignment cop can check at least one person yea.
 
1708280174848.png
a fairy you're so cruel smhsmh
 
Back
Top