NOC Pokemon Mystery Dungeon Mafia - Explorers - Game Thread (Game Over!)

It’s semi plausible that saber was killed because he town spewed himself from post deadline posting and the mafia just took the chance on that. I don’t think it’s a near certainty he rev martyr’d me especially given my claim was kind of buried. I would hope he saw it though. Unfortunately seems like mostly a dead end
That would definitely not be the exact reason for killing saber lol but I get wym
 
it has to do with the things you said related to the oligarchy, but her just saying "he was being voted because of the oligarchy stuff" is a bit simplistic, there were clear problems with specific things you mentioned about the oligarchy (i.e. you voting JALMONT because you perceived him as trying to manipulate the game state despite him naked voting all day and honestly not giving a crap about d1 to the point he no voted)

is this directed at me or celever
 
I won't be voting jalmont today and I will be probably voting most counter wagons to him if someone tries to wagon him

if he is mafia, my bad but he's literally self resolving and jumping the gun on a self resolving slot is pointless
 
is this directed at me or celever
well it's directed to him but it's my point to you

you're kinda just writing off the wagon on him as if your debate club theory is exactly the same thing as celever's oligarchy stuff but phrased better when it's really far from that, he was using it in attempt to reduce the influence of several players in the thread and pointed to specific examples of things they were saying (most notably that they were fosing him, lol)
 
I won't be voting jalmont today and I will be probably voting most counter wagons to him if someone tries to wagon him

if he is mafia, my bad but he's literally self resolving and jumping the gun on a self resolving slot is pointless
He’s self resolving given a night to shoot someone which he… didn’t do
 
I assume it’s directed at me but it’s a really really bad argument and I might just drop it

Shane is trying really hard to justify what is at its core just inconsistent reads
there's nothing inconsistent about my reads

i said you were a wolf, and you are saying "you said i was a wolf but you were actually fencesitting and really didn't say i was a wolf" which is fatuous bullshit
 
well it's directed to him but it's my point to you

you're kinda just writing off the wagon on him as if your debate club theory is exactly the same thing as celever's oligarchy stuff but phrased better when it's really far from that, he was using it in attempt to reduce the influence of several players in the thread and pointed to specific examples of things they were saying (most notably that they were fosing him, lol)
Why is that most notably? That’s one of myriad examples. You can say it’s most notably but it isn’t. The most notable thing is probably the pulsar safeclaim BS.
 
well it's directed to him but it's my point to you

you're kinda just writing off the wagon on him as if your debate club theory is exactly the same thing as celever's oligarchy stuff but phrased better when it's really far from that, he was using it in attempt to reduce the influence of several players in the thread and pointed to specific examples of things they were saying (most notably that they were fosing him, lol)

that's fair i dont think it changes much w.r.t. how i view my eod
 
there's nothing inconsistent about my reads

i said you were a wolf, and you are saying "you said i was a wolf but you were actually fencesitting and really didn't say i was a wolf" which is fatuous bullshit
“But it gives us info” is what you say in a null gamestate where you really aren’t that clear if someone’s a wolf or not so you want to flip them to also capitalise on their reads and interactions if they turn out to be town

If you thought I was actually a wolf you don’t say that
 
Back
Top