i didn't want to derail the abortion thread, but i'm still stunned that you feel that natural luck should take priority over enforced equality. i've always seen that as a "god made me better than you" stance, which is why i'm having trouble understanding how a non-fanatic can justify it. surely if you were less fortunate yourself, you would have social protection exist? and i assume you're familiar with the established theory that a more equal society is a healthier one?
outside of human rights, i actually think health care is a necessity for a functional economy. the problem is, if health insurance is privately funded, only people who expect to profit from it will buy it, meaning the people who are generally sickly. this forces insurance companies to raise their prices, and then more people choose to forgo insurance. this causes a cycle that results in what the usa looks like now: a huge portion (30%?) of the population is completely uninsured, and that's bad for everyone.