Delko
Reaction score
242

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • This letter is not intended to assuage your worst fears about Delko but will, in most cases, confirm them. So let's begin, quite properly, with a brief look at the historical development of the problem, of its attempted solutions, and of the eternal argument about it. Just as night follows day, he will scapegoat easy, unpopular targets, thereby diverting responsibility from more culpable parties, in the coming days. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Delko had learned anything from history, he'd know that if we make him answer for his wrongdoings then the sea of Chekism, on which he so heavily relies, will begin to dry up.

    What I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that Delko refers to a variety of things using the word "phenomenalistic". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, he's saying that he can change his immoral ways, which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, an injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere. Keep that in mind the next time you catch Delko burning books.

    Delko plans to don the mantel of mysticism and perpetuate misguided and questionable notions of other conniving hoddypeaks' intentions. What can you do about that? Start by reading about how Delko is determined to put as little thought as possible into solving the undeniable problems that our society is still facing with regard to sciolism. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propaganda surrounding his promotion of vandalism. Tell everyone you know that Delko's biggest lie is that education should teach the precepts of Trotskyism and the duties of man towards corrupt braggarts. Sure, he might be able to peddle that boatload of parisology to the hayseeds, but there's an important difference between me and Delko. Namely, I am willing to die for my cause. Delko, in contrast, is willing to kill for his—or, if not to kill, at least to propitiate self-centered degenerates for later eventualities.

    Delko has completely stepped off the deep end. In reaching that conclusion I have made the usual assumption that it would be charitable of me not to mention that the cardinal rule of his false-flag operations is that lackluster, dodgy Pyrrhonism is the only thing that matters. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity so I will instead maintain that his hastily mounted campaigns are like the Hydra from Greek mythology. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to recall the ideals of compassion, nonviolence, community, and cooperation. The only way to destroy Delko's Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that wherever you look, you'll see him enforcing intolerance in the name of tolerance. You'll see him suppressing freedom in the name of freedom. And you'll see him crushing diversity of opinion in the name of diversity.

    Delko is the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to his editorials. When I first heard about his ravings, I didn't know whether to laugh, because his rejoinders are so hateful, or cry, because he insists that purblind, loquacious brigands and infernal know-it-alls should rule this country. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates. Although theoretical differences can be drawn between Delko's loud diegeses and volage-brained exclusivism, these are distinctions without a difference. Now that I've been exposed to Delko's hypnopompic insights I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps I have some of Delko's writings in front of me right now. In one of them, Delko maintains that his opinions represent the opinions of the majority—or even a plurality. If you don't find that shocking then consider that if Delko gets his way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of plagiarism and indescribable horror. That's why I'm telling you that the main dissensus between me and Delko is that I maintain that it would be impossible, even between the covers of a thousand volumes, to list and describe all of the insidious things that Delko has done. He, on the other hand, contends that lying is morally justifiable as long as it's referred to as "strategic deception". All right, I think I've said enough about how Delko is unable to use the English language effectively or correctly. I'd be curious to see if Delko has a persuasive rebuttal.

    I'll do some in the coming weeks when I'm less busy with college. Need to study for some big tests right now :(
    Landorus-T + Gyarados is prolly a better Intimidate core

    Anyway, add Tentacruel and a Heatran (either Shed Shell + SR or Scarf if you want a revenge killer) (to Skarm + Jellicetn core) and that gives us one spot left, which we can use to patch up issues with Terrakion + Conkeldurr. (note that this pokemon would also need to set up SR if we used Heatran for RK duties which limits us to Gliscor / Landorus-T if we go down that route)
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top