their terrible because i cant see a conceivable reason for them to be made, and you're making assumptions out of nothingok so again basically zero explanation for why those posts were terrible. cool!
that is my reason for scumreading Celever, you can claim it’s “making assumptions” then but that’s why I was against him once he made that string of poststheir terrible because i cant see a conceivable reason for them to be made, and you're making assumptions out of nothing
no im saying your posts are terrible, not histhat is my reason for scumreading Celever, you can claim it’s “making assumptions” then but that’s why I was against him once he made that string of posts
I’m defending my posts, consider learning to read properlyno im saying your posts are terrible, not his
i feel bad for u its like me last game except its less confusingThe readlist is based on my subjective opinion combined with my view of the objective opinion, in the objective opinion I cannot say anyone would be able to be able to seen as town by now, but in my subjective opinion Neon's playstyle right now isnt to the benefit of mafia in the slightlest, in a day where mafia would be desperate to make moves, their playstyle hasnt changed. And so, I townlean them.
agreedAnyone who is treating this as 3 equally likely scenarios is either treating it in bad faith (Celever) or does not understand what Peum is saying
i think this idea of 'most likely scum -> must vote' is not necessarily correct and misses peum's point. peum's point is that other people, such as celever, give more information from their flipWell, my question is do you think genisu is scum? If you think he is, then he should get your vote unless you’re moreso sure on someone else
see ^Yeah probably
I think it’s just weird to say “this person is most likely to be scum” (genius) and then vote for someone else (Celever) lol
Like that is weird is it not??