• Follow our Instagram!
  • Curious about what we're currently doing about bots? Check out the latest updates from staff in this thread.

Small Site Page Changes - (Typos, Poor Wording, Inaccuracies, Etc.)

Unseen Fist's Champions description should match the previous two generations.

"This Pokemon's contact moves ignore a target's protection and deal 1/4 the usual damage."

"a" should be "the" like the previous generations.
 
DO NOT EDIT YOUR POSTS IN THIS THREAD. DOUBLE POST. TRIPLE POST, BUT DO *NOT* EDIT.

Post small changes to pages on the site here. Fundamental idea: if there is something wrong with a page on the site and your fix does not change the structure of it, then post it here instead of making a new topic. (Quick addition: if your change is controversial, this is probably not the topic for it. All C&C forums have an analysis discussion thread for such changes, where the relevant people will see them quicker; if your change is to a non-analysis page, feel free to post it here though)

Why are there no posts here?: When something gets fixed in this thread the post is deleted, don't be weirded out by the lack of posts!

SCMS people: You don't need to post here. Just make the change yourself. If you fix someone else's problem, please post that you did so.

When corrections are made by Site Staff, the post reporting the error will be deleted.

Rules

~ It would be wonderful if you linked to the page you want to correct, that makes fixing it that much quicker. Please link to the page on the site. I'm tired of trying to find the page to edit something, only to read through the whole thing and realize you were talking about the ADV analysis or something dumb. If you just say something like "Geodude needs to have 5 more Attack EVs on its Rock Throw set" without linking to the analysis, you will be infracted. If you can't take the time to just add a link, then it's not that helpful.

~ If the errors you find are limited to certain parts of a page, it's a great idea to clarify in which areas your edits are located. For example, "On Kakuna's 'Ubers Support' set, x needs to be capitalized". Better yet is quoting the context so the section you're talking about is quickly and easily found.

~ If your change cannot be made by regular badgeholders or staff members, this is not the thread for it. Regular badge holders can edit analyses, articles, and other "unique" site pages, i.e. pretty much everything that was written in a workshop-like subforum; changes to these pages should go here. However, if, instead, your change is a more structural change, e.g. involves editing a database file (e.g. is to move descriptions or Pokemon learnsets), a template (e.g. the placeholder hyperlinks that appear on any empty dex page), or anything that isn't text (e.g. a broken sprite or 3D model), then post in the Dex bug report thread.


NOTICE #1: Badged members, do NOT just auto-correct all the suggestions. A lot of the time, the suggestion isn't grammatically correct.

NOTICE #2: Be clear about what you have fixed and always make a post AFTER the corrected post to note this.

NOTICE #3: I've noticed that for some reason on the credits page that strings of text will move around the page in between edits from when a person edits the page and when someone caches it. Nobody is doing this on purpose, and it irritates me that it happens, though it mostly happens at the very bottom of the page after the last </dd> tag. For a while there it was "Symphx" that was jumping down, and then a few times it was "ed seve" that jumped. IDK why or how this happens, just be aware that it does.

NOTICE #4:

DO NOT EDIT YOUR POSTS IN THIS THREAD. DOUBLE POST. TRIPLE POST, BUT DO *NOT* EDIT.

Post small changes to pages on the site here. Fundamental idea: if there is something wrong with a page on the site and your fix does not change the structure of it, then post it here instead of making a new topic. (Quick addition: if your change is controversial, this is probably not the topic for it. All C&C forums have an analysis discussion thread for such changes, where the relevant people will see them quicker; if your change is to a non-analysis page, feel free to post it here though)

Why are there no posts here?: When something gets fixed in this thread the post is deleted, don't be weirded out by the lack of posts!

SCMS people: You don't need to post here. Just make the change yourself. If you fix someone else's problem, please post that you did so.

When corrections are made by Site Staff, the post reporting the error will be deleted.

Rules

~ It would be wonderful if you linked to the page you want to correct, that makes fixing it that much quicker. Please link to the page on the site. I'm tired of trying to find the page to edit something, only to read through the whole thing and realize you were talking about the ADV analysis or something dumb. If you just say something like "Geodude needs to have 5 more Attack EVs on its Rock Throw set" without linking to the analysis, you will be infracted. If you can't take the time to just add a link, then it's not that helpful.

~ If the errors you find are limited to certain parts of a page, it's a great idea to clarify in which areas your edits are located. For example, "On Kakuna's 'Ubers Support' set, x needs to be capitalized". Better yet is quoting the context so the section you're talking about is quickly and easily found.

~ If your change cannot be made by regular badgeholders or staff members, this is not the thread for it. Regular badge holders can edit analyses, articles, and other "unique" site pages, i.e. pretty much everything that was written in a workshop-like subforum; changes to these pages should go here. However, if, instead, your change is a more structural change, e.g. involves editing a database file (e.g. is to move descriptions or Pokemon learnsets), a template (e.g. the placeholder hyperlinks that appear on any empty dex page), or anything that isn't text (e.g. a broken sprite or 3D model), then post in the Dex bug report thread.


NOTICE #1: Badged members, do NOT just auto-correct all the suggestions. A lot of the time, the suggestion isn't grammatically correct.

NOTICE #2: Be clear about what you have fixed and always make a post AFTER the corrected post to note this.

NOTICE #3: I've noticed that for some reason on the credits page that strings of text will move around the page in between edits from when a person edits the page and when someone caches it. Nobody is doing this on purpose, and it irritates me that it happens, though it mostly happens at the very bottom of the page after the last </dd> tag. For a while there it was "Symphx" that was jumping down, and then a few times it was "ed seve" that jumped. IDK why or how this happens, just be aware that it does.

NOTICE #4:
The item "Pretty Feather" should probably be shifted down to "useless items" :PPP
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260905-135905.png
    Screenshot_20260905-135905.png
    706.7 KB · Views: 57
From Ho-Oh's ADV Ubers analysis, in the Choice Band section:

Ho-Oh's MASSIVE Attack, myriad physical moves, and Sacred Fire make it a decent Choice Bander.

While Ho-Oh does have a high Attack stat, it is being exaggerated for no good reason. There are several Pokémon used in ADV Ubers with equivalent or higher Attack. The way Sacred Fire is mentioned in the context of a Band set also doesn't make sense as presented because the move is still Special in this generation.

Here's a rewrite:

Ho-Oh can comfortably run a Choice Band thanks to its high Attack and myriad options for physical moves.

Honestly the whole analysis looks like it needs a rewrite. The formatting seems outdated and the writing style a tad too casual. I'd overhaul it myself, but have basically no experience with ADV Ubers so I am not informed enough to do so.
 
Rewriting analyses is out of scope for the GP team, on top of being more than a small site change. As far as I'm aware, GP members shouldn't make direct changes or removals to the analysis content, especially if they're already on the dex for an extended period of time, because at that point they'd be acting as co-writers. If you're interested in learning the GP process, then I highly suggest checking out the workshop.

For this specific analysis, there's already a revamp currently in progress, so there's not much point in doing any GP revisions to the one on-site.
 
Last edited:
Rewriting analyses is out of scope for the GP team, on top of being more than a small site change. As far as I'm aware, GP members shouldn't make direct changes or removals to the analysis content, especially if they're already on the dex for an extended period of time, because at that point they'd be acting as co-writers. If you're interested in learning the GP process, then I highly suggest checking out the workshop.

For this specific analysis, there's already a revamp currently in progress, so there's not much point in doing any GP revisions to the one on-site.
I figured big changes were outside the scope of this thread but still felt it worth mentioning. Draws attention to the analysis so someone more qualified can do the necessary work, especially since the linked thread hasn't been updated in a year.
 
Clefable's UU analysis for Gen 4 consistently utilizes gendered language throughout by referring to the Pokémon with she/her pronouns, which is against our writing standards on top of being inaccurate. This needs a whole analysis sweep, but unlike my previous Ho-Oh report should still qualify as a small change. Outside of potential minor rewrites to a few sentences, this should be an easy find/replace job thay does not affect the body of the writing.
 
Back
Top