https://www.smogon.com/dex/sv/pokemon/porygon-z/nu/
porygon-z's been rubl for months but still has an nu analysis
porygon-z's been rubl for months but still has an nu analysis
-
Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
Small Site Page Changes - (Typos, Poor Wording, Inaccuracies, Etc.)
- Thread starter Oglemi
- Start date
https://www.smogon.com/dex/sv/abilities/forewarn
The description of Forewarn says "(...) .This effect considers ... Counter, Mirror Coat, and Metal Burst to have 120 power...". In generation IX it should include Comeuppance, too.
The description of Forewarn says "(...) .This effect considers ... Counter, Mirror Coat, and Metal Burst to have 120 power...". In generation IX it should include Comeuppance, too.
https://www.smogon.com/dex/dp/pokemon/scizor/
The "other options" section mentions a stat boost passing moveset, even though that strategy is currently banned in gen 4 OU.
The "other options" section mentions a stat boost passing moveset, even though that strategy is currently banned in gen 4 OU.
From Omastar's Gen 6 OU analysis:
The wording is poor. Modest Omastar is extremely fast under Rain (beats anything below base 140 Speed), it's just that the math means it doesn't take much for a Scarfer to outspeed due to a low base Speed. Scarfers only need to be base 78 Speed (fully invested) to outpace; hell, Rotom-W's listed Scarf set doesn't even run full investment and wins.
It should probably read like this.
I haven't played ORAS in forever so maybe some of these Scarfers aren't in vogue anymore, but the point still stands.
The wording is poor. Modest Omastar is extremely fast under Rain (beats anything below base 140 Speed), it's just that the math means it doesn't take much for a Scarfer to outspeed due to a low base Speed. Scarfers only need to be base 78 Speed (fully invested) to outpace; hell, Rotom-W's listed Scarf set doesn't even run full investment and wins.
It should probably read like this.
I haven't played ORAS in forever so maybe some of these Scarfers aren't in vogue anymore, but the point still stands.
This analysis page has "syngergy".
This privacy policy is missing the serial comma at "...types of data collected, how data is used and your choices...."
The second sentence of the about page ends with "...in every aspect of competitive Pokémon from team building to battling tactics," where a comma belongs after "Pokémon," no?
The philosophy page in its second sentence says that "Part 2 applies this to various arguments leveled against Smogon in an informative way," but it presumably means that this is informative (not leveling against Smogon).
(reposted in order not to break this topic's cardinal rule not to edit)
This privacy policy is missing the serial comma at "...types of data collected, how data is used and your choices...."
The second sentence of the about page ends with "...in every aspect of competitive Pokémon from team building to battling tactics," where a comma belongs after "Pokémon," no?
The philosophy page in its second sentence says that "Part 2 applies this to various arguments leveled against Smogon in an informative way," but it presumably means that this is informative (not leveling against Smogon).
- The next paragraph, at "...criticized for its behaviors, its beliefs, and its general attitude. But it can be hard to grasp that this is often intended..." would be "these are" (rather than "this is"), no?
(reposted in order not to break this topic's cardinal rule not to edit)
This truly delightful article has "The only time a participle should be omitted altogether is if it...don't bother to mention...." Don't would like to be doesn't.