Vert
Reaction score
7,957

Profile posts Postings About

  • basically, yeah. content is QC's job since they're the people who're selected for metagame knowledge & stuff! while that doesn't mean other people can't weigh in, it's really better to do that explicitly / not include content corrections in the gp stage, especially since tbh writers might not always carefully consider the edits they're making. it's not your fault; apologies if i worded anything too harshly in the thread but yeah it's definitely something i would steer clear of.
    Ok so here is what we decided. Yanmega is pretty bad right now and we are considering not giving it an analysis. However, if you can gather logs showcasing its effectiveness then we may reconsider. Just make sure that you are willing to defend it if you decide to make a thread about it, and to gather good logs against good opponents, not against random scrubs that Yanmega barely does antyhig useful ok?
    Ok then, i will talk with the rest of the QC team and tell you if Yanmega needs an update.
    Oh sry, i forgot you had told me you wanted Weavile, so go ahead and take it if you still want it...
    You know what they say, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. Why don't you try using one of your own?
    Well, maybe. But like I said, I'm just honored that you decided to nominate me, no matter what they decide. Thanks!
    Wow, man I really appreciate that. I doubt that they'll accept it (I like the team, but I don't think it's THAT good), but still, I'm honored that you decided to nominate me :) thanks!
    Oh i didn't answer, i thought i did... Anyway, i will talk with the QC team and see if we will update the analysis via SCMS or with an update. Also thx!
    Since the Tangrowth analysis hasn't been fully written up yet or given its final QC approval stamp, it's too early to GP check it; you should check back after its been moved to "copyediting."
    That idea that you're talking about with False sounds great! If you choose to do it, please send both False and I a preview of it, so we can see what is looks like before you release it. Only one stipulation for making this thread: False and I have a lot of control over what you decide to post on the thread. If we say to post a certain update, then you MUST do it. For example, if I say to update the group on the current tournament that we're doing, and you choose not to, then we will delete the thread and give the reins to someone else. If you choose to accept these terms, then you may create it.
    "So, if we let you into the group, would you be an active contributor? We want members who will actively participate in group discussions and projects."

    That.
    ...How did you know I was going to ask that next...?

    Well, you sound like you'd make a nice addition to the group. Welcome to the Smogon Creators Organization. : )

    If you'd like to introduce yourself to the rest of the group, or if you have any questions regarding the group you'd like to ask, you can do both in the Introduction thread. Also, please read through the group rules before posting.
    Interesting. So, how experienced would you say you are in OU? Would you consider yourself knowledgeable?
    So, you're interested in joining the Smogon Creators Organization? Could you tell me a little about yourself, your experiences on Smogon and why you want to join?
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top