it would be very funny to vote out celever right now after he posted those massive walls of text
but i don't think it's him
question though: does a maf former ever see celever's 'slip' and interpret it as such?
Though I think it was a reaction test
Walls of text aren't actually alignment indicative. ISO's are infamously easy to fake and simply convince people you are town just because there are walls to read. Ignore it, its just noise.it would be very funny to vote out celever right now after he posted those massive walls of text
but i don't think it's him
question though: does a maf former ever see celever's 'slip' and interpret it as such?
What are you talking about here?
I don't hate Celever's reaction to the Former fakeclaim because tbh I assumed it was fake too, but I'm kinda ? on him pointing out the Former claim probably being fake in game thread but that's more of a "why do this" thing than "this is scummy". I'm kinda mulling over the possibility of Celever/Tommy because there are reasons it could be real, but I don't really suspect Tommy independently which makes me feel like it's a bad read to get into.
My confidence in town Clarinet is definitely sinking a bit. The bottom of page 12 is weird. Why do you have Eagle as scum here btw?
</3it would be very funny to vote out celever right now after he posted those massive walls of text
<3but i don't think it's him
From one perspective, he kinda has to stick to his guns because it's his only contribution today. If he backtracks on this, he loses a lot of face.question though: does a maf former ever see celever's 'slip' and interpret it as such?
I won't even lie, a solid 50% of my read on Tommy is that I saw the slip that Celever said and in my mind my first thought was that it sounds like something Tommy would say. Then looked back and there's a bit of uncharacteristic language from Tommy re: Celever and so buddying seems entirely possible.What are you talking about here?
I don't hate Celever's reaction to the Former fakeclaim because tbh I assumed it was fake too, but I'm kinda ? on him pointing out the Former claim probably being fake in game thread but that's more of a "why do this" thing than "this is scummy". I'm kinda mulling over the possibility of Celever/Tommy because there are reasons it could be real, but I don't really suspect Tommy independently which makes me feel like it's a bad read to get into.
My confidence in town Clarinet is definitely sinking a bit. The bottom of page 12 is weird. Why do you have Eagle as scum here btw?
Pointing out that I said this already on like the last page I think. This is painting me as trying to garner town cred when I already said posting walls isn't town cred.Walls of text aren't actually alignment indicative. ISO's are infamously easy to fake and simply convince people you are town just because there are walls to read. Ignore it, its just noise.
I won't even lie, a solid 50% of my read on Tommy is that I saw the slip that Celever said and in my mind my first thought was that it sounds like something Tommy would say. Then looked back and there's a bit of uncharacteristic language from Tommy re: Celever and so buddying seems entirely possible.
Also I must have missed that, Tommy is scumreading Eagle?
Yeah see like....I don't think town you ever actually posts this....like. This post is so unlike you.Volume is towny if you go to a certain point, cele is p much volume cleared after that much wallposts
I won't even lie, a solid 50% of my read on Tommy is that I saw the slip that Celever said and in my mind my first thought was that it sounds like something Tommy would say. Then looked back and there's a bit of uncharacteristic language from Tommy re: Celever and so buddying seems entirely possible.
Also I must have missed that, Tommy is scumreading Eagle?
Yeah see like....I don't think town you ever actually posts this....like. This post is so unlike you.
Former is my buddy Tommy or BGB or both because you literally can't have it both ways and still have a coherent argument unless you think you game solved on D1 with a whole 3-man scumteam.
Walls of text aren't actually alignment indicative. ISO's are infamously easy to fake and simply convince people you are town just because there are walls to read. Ignore it, its just noise.
I won't even lie, a solid 50% of my read on Tommy is that I saw the slip that Celever said and in my mind my first thought was that it sounds like something Tommy would say. Then looked back and there's a bit of uncharacteristic language from Tommy re: Celever and so buddying seems entirely possible.
where tf are tbz and clarinet isn't it daytime in america
As far as I can tell his case on me only works if BGB is my theorised buddy because otherwise I wouldn’t be “forced to react” as mafia, is why I asked. If BGB isn’t my buddy his suspicion on me is unfounded and since he’s suspicious of you by connection with me his whole platform falls through.He's entitled to have multiple reads and not the exact team D1 tbf I don't see anything wrong with this part
As far as I can tell his case on me only works if BGB is my theorised buddy because otherwise I wouldn’t be “forced to react” as mafia, is why I asked. If BGB isn’t my buddy his suspicion on me is unfounded and since he’s suspicious of you by connection with me his whole platform falls through.
Ah you’re right I keep forgetting with all his talk about how his gambit “forced mafia to respond” but he’s never said why that’s the case so I made up my own explanation.He's suspicious of you because he thinks you slipped
(Former clarified the guilty was real between posts)I believe
unvote Dusk
Vote Bluegummybear
[should be badgummybear]
No more of this bologna, Former! Nuxl wouldn't start a game with a cop having a mafia peek
Bgd is a slight scumlean, but it has nothing to do with your false 'peek'
(Former retracted between posts)Eagle, at that time, I didn't trust Former, but my vote was real!
gummy felt fishy
unvote bluegummy
hate former's troll
I'm not automatically townleaning gummy, but that false 'peek' made things more complicated
if gummy is scum, former did more harm than good
I reread Clarinet.
(Former posts his initial guilty)
(Former clarified the guilty was real between posts)
(Former retracted between posts)
Why is Clarinet not voting for BGB anymore? Did he just forget why he was scumreading him before the reaction test? It's weird BGB and Clarinet were posting at the same time at the bottom of Page 12 and Clarinet didn't try to push BGB at all for anything even when BGB asked them a question. I don't like this progression very much.
Vote: Clarinet