Project 1v1 Shopfront

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jocus

Banned deucer.
Poison Adhesive
I'd like to buy 10 teams for 70 Kyubits.
Then the next purchase is 10 teams for 35 Kyubits.
Then the next purchase is 10 teams for 17.5 Kyubits.
And so forth, ad infinitum.
 

PA

Purgatory.
is a Tiering Contributoris a Contributor to Smogonis a Site Content Manager Alumnusis a Forum Moderator Alumnus
Poison Adhesive
I'd like to buy 10 teams for 70 Kyubits.
Then the next purchase is 10 teams for 35 Kyubits.
Then the next purchase is 10 teams for 17.5 Kyubits.
And so forth, ad infinitum.
Please specify the teams you would like eg 2v2/adv 1v1 mixed etc.
B: doesn't work like that half-price only works once per purchase eg: one you buy 1 and you buy another the second becomes half price and then goes back to original price etc
 

Jocus

Banned deucer.
Smogon District Court of 1v1, Jocus vs Poison Adhesive

JOCUS litigates concerning the failure of POISON ADHESIVE to charge advertised prices in his shop and provide advertised services, the "2V2 AND ADV 1V1 KYUBITS CAMP." Several sentences in his shop advertisement have not been adhered to:
:jirachi: 2V2 AND ADV 1V1 KYUBITS CAMP :Salamence:
** omg cheap prices omg very good quality teams happy customers guaranteed
happy customers :blobnom: : LittleRunnerXC Arai more to come!
and now the moment you've been waiting for... PRICES!!
PRICES :espeon: :
1 SET = 5 KYUBITS
1 TEAM = 10 KYUBITS!
5 TEAMS = 35 KYUBITS!
10 TEAMS = 70 KYUBITS!
20 TEAMS = 140 KYUBITS!
people who buy once get half prize off the next purchase!
current people: Arai LittleRunnerXC
The first is "happy customers guaranteed," contradicting the current state of the plaintiff. He demands compensation for all therapy charges relating to mental disorders resultant from the legal process undertaken in this case, medical charges concerning brain damage from mandatory confinement in the Pokemon Showdown! room "The Happy Place", and penalties incurred from his employer "The International Church of RNG" for missed work or a reduced capacity to work. The second is "people who buy once get half prize [sic] off the next purchase," which implies that the latest purchase price, not the original price, is halved in the calculation of the price; yet the defendant follows with a statement contradicting the original advertisement after the purchase that "B: doesn't work like that half-price only works once per purchase eg: one you buy 1 and you buy another the second becomes half price and then goes back to original price etc[.]" The plantiff demands that the court order the defendant to charge the plaintiff the original advertised price, that the defendant's second statement be ordered to be withdrawn, and that the defendant answer to a criminal court for violation of regulations relating to advertisements and prices in business. In addition, the plaintiff demands all legal fees to be redeemed.

JOCUS is prepared to appeal to the Other Metagames Appellate Court and thereafter the Smogon Supreme Court should this case be rejected.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 0)

Top