If you give us a few days, we’ll update the whole tier list to reflect Kyu-B’s absence.Should the banlist be updated with Kyu-B and Jirachi?
Ninja Edit: Same with the tier list
If you give us a few days, we’ll update the whole tier list to reflect Kyu-B’s absence.Should the banlist be updated with Kyu-B and Jirachi?
Ninja Edit: Same with the tier list
Couldn't agree more. The removal of KyuB specifically helps this thing. It's powerful, and has two great abilities, Sap Sipper and Berserk, the former is what I was looking for; a mon not many people know about that can absorb the subseeder's status moves.
Drampa: Unranked ---> C-
Yes, I am dead serious, this isn't a meme, I legitimately think Drampa has a substantial enough niche to be ranked in spite of Porygon-Z and Meloetta existing.
That niche? Being able to take on things neither of those other two mons can hope to take on, which includes:
Genesect
Mega Metagross
Mega Charizard Y
Mega Scizor
Mega Mawile
Tapu Koko (with some prediction vs sub)
Whimsicott and Jumpluff without stupid Uproar bs
In return, it doesn't really sacrifice a lot of notable match-ups compared to its competition.
Here's the set I've been using:
Drampa @ Choice Specs
Ability: Sap Sipper
EVs: 216 SpA / 176 SpD / 116 Spe
Modest Nature
IVs: 0 Atk
- Hyper Beam
- Hyper Voice
- Fire Blast
- Ice Beam
Meta trends in favor of the best mon ever:
-kyub is dead
-fairium koko is dead along with kyub
-hp fire pz is dead, removing competition for its niche
tldr rank yung dramps
252 Atk Garchomp Devastating Drake (190 BP) vs. 252 HP / 0 Def Multiscale Dragonite: 324-382 (83.9 - 98.9%) -- guaranteed 2HKOOn the topic of these new changes, I want to talk about one which I for sure agree with, that being Garchomp, except I would like to go one further and nominate it for A-
The main reason I feel like it did not receive as much usage or was as viable before was as a result of Kyurem-Black being legal in the tier, and that is definitely a big reason for a boost in the viability rankings, as it lost its main check, which was the most used pokemon in the metagame. However another reason, is that pokemon which were also checked hard by Kyurem-Black such as Zygarde and Dragonite, are rising in usage even more now, and thus garchomp is even better than before not just because of the Kyurem-Black ban, but because of how well it does against these higher usage threats, even more so than before the ban of kyub, as it no longer needs to run scarf leaving it lacking in the power to OHKO Zygarde and Dragonite, and thus letting it perform better against the metagame in general as well as it can wallbreak more effectively.
Tldr; kyub ban made stuff Chomp beats more popular thus making it lose its strongest check and beat some prominent threats post kyub meta like dragonite and zygarde
I feel like fast dragonite is more prominent right now, but that's just from my experience, and Garchomp does OHKO that, however I acknowledge your other points and rescind my statement.252 Atk Garchomp Devastating Drake (190 BP) vs. 252 HP / 0 Def Multiscale Dragonite: 324-382 (83.9 - 98.9%) -- guaranteed 2HKO
some pretty standard bulk just takes the wind right out of Garchomp's sails, for the most part. Here's another example:
-1 252 Atk Choice Band Garchomp Earthquake vs. 252 HP / 0 Def Mawile-Mega: 270-320 (88.8 - 105.2%) -- 31.3% chance to OHKO
The Gen 7 change to Rocky Helmet, Rough Skin, Iron Barbs, etc where Garchomp now dies first really hurt, since it lost the opportunity to win these matchups that it used to always win, not to mention everything becoming progressively bulkier as time goes on, which all takes a toll on Garchomp's chances. As a result of this, I feel that its place is well-deserved in B Rank, since it's a fun mon that you can build multiple sets to beat a lot of things, but the opportunity cost between each set really hinders it from being a serious metagame threat.
We're not looking to drop pokemon just because other pokemon have inherently better performances, especially when the competing pokemon perform completely different roles on the teams they're used on.controversial nom time
Charizard-Mega-Y: A ---> A-
Lemme get this out of the way: Megazard Y is not a bad Pokemon at all. It is definitely an A level Pokemon. So why am I nomming it down? Simple really: Because of Mega Charizard X. When they're forced to pick between one of two forms, people almost always go for X, and for good reason. Megazard X simply offers way more power and utility with its typing. While Megazard has to rely on a shoddy nuke that can result in its own demise if you predict poorly, Charizard X can just spam Outrage and use Dragon Dance or Flame Charge if it is not 100% certain the foe will go down. Megazard X also responds to meta trends way, way better than Y: Specifically the rise of Koko, Dragonite and Mimikyu, as well as certain Sturdies like Magnezone and Sawk. Charizard has way more customizability with its spreads due to Dragon/Fire being way better than Flying/Fire defensively. I know ladder usage is not the best thing to off of for VR noms, but in the past few days, the amounts of Megazard Xs I've seen outnumber the Megazard Ys by an immense margin.
tl;dr Charizard-Mega-Y is 9 times out of 10 outclassed by Charizard-Mega-X due to the latter's better offenses, defensive type, additional attacking/support options and general splashability. Therefore, I feel it should go down.
Short answer: YesIs the set compedium in order of most viable sets? (For each pokemon)
Tapu Koko S- > S
Mega Metagross S- > A+
Dragonite A > A+
Mega Pinsir A- > B+
Mega Venusaur B+ > A-
Carracosta B- > C+
Terrakion B- > C+
Latios B- > C+
Kommo-o C+ > B-
Hitmonlee C > C-
Barbaracle C- > D
Haxorus D > C
Rhyperior D > C-
Zygarde-10% D > Unranked
Hydreigon Unranked > C
Volcanion Unranked > D
Serperior Unranked > C-
Whimsicott C+ > B-
I think most of the viable dragons in the tier are more versatile and beat more stuff. For example, why use Hydreigon over Haxorus, who can kill more stuff with mold breaker, or scarf garchomp? Why use it over Dragonite, with better coverage and versatility? I remember testing scarf hydreigon and it didn't have a fun time.But what is Hydreigon outclassed by?
THANK YOU, i can now use this to attempt to C-Team the meta.VR update time!
the op will be updated when deg wakes upCode:Tapu Koko S- > S Mega Metagross S- > A+ Dragonite A > A+ Mega Pinsir A- > B+ Mega Venusaur B+ > A- Carracosta B- > C+ Terrakion B- > C+ Latios B- > C+ Kommo-o C+ > B- Hitmonlee C > C- Barbaracle C- > D Haxorus D > C Rhyperior D > C- Zygarde-10% D > Unranked Hydreigon Unranked > C Volcanion Unranked > D Serperior Unranked > C- Whimsicott C+ > B-
I've tested scarf sawsbuck on ladder, from my experience, it is far worse than Jirachi or Togekiss. The decrease of power from an 80 bp Iron Head to a 70 BP Headbutt is significant enough to turn many neutral 3HKOs from Jirachi into neutral 4HKO's for Sawsbuck, giving your opponent another chance to break through, changing a 36% chance of winning for Jirachi (double flinch=.6*.6=.36) into a 22% chance of winning for Sawsbuck (.6*.6*.6), roughly the chance of a Gyarados waterfall flinch, which is obviously not impossible, but not something I would rely on to win consistently. Additionally, the typing change along with worse defenses is also significant. Sawsbuck has more weaknesses and less resistances, and it's mediocre 80/70/70 bulk means that if your opponent breaks through once, it's over. Part of the reason Jirachi was so broken and so used was because it's excellent Psychic/Steel typing combined with legendary 100/100/100 bulk made it so that if your opponent broke through once, the game wasn't over, you were more likely to live a given attack (assuming a neutral matchup, never send Jirachi to an unfavorable type matchup). Additionally, the steel typing of Iron Head let it do extremely well against fairies, and most importantly while Jirachi was legal, KyuB. Beating the best Pokemon in the meta and then some always makes you good. Sawsbuck does not even have a favorable matchup against Gyarados, the current best Pokemon. A non-megaed bulky Gyarados is 5HKOed after intimidate by Sawsbuck with Headbutt (which it has to use because it loses after Gyarados gets +2), which makes the chances of winning (getting 3 flinches) again a 22% chance at best (Gyarados needs to not get flinched twice in order to get two attacks off (unless you run bounce), unlike other powerful Pokemon that only need to get one powerful attack off, but are 4HKOed).Here's a video of me talking about all of the drops and rises.
The ban of Kyurem-Black, I would suggest, makes Whimsicott worse. One of the reasons to use Whimsicott over Jumpluff was its rather worry-free Kyurem-Black matchup. Only Sub Icium-Z and Max Special Attack invested sets were real difficulties. This makes the Kyu-b matchup far better for Whimsicott, especially at Team Preview. It never had to guess whether the Kyu-b was Scarf. In my opinion, Whimsicott is as viable as Jumpluff. I think it should never have been moved to C+, and a move to B- was overdue, similar to Carracosta’s drop.Here's a video of me talking about all of the drops and rises.
I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here, friend. The way I’ve seen people use the word, a gimmick in 1v1 is a surprise set that only works as long as your opponent does not know what items/evs/moves you’re running, but is much less effective if they do. Mega-Venusaur’s two sets are widely known and easily prepared for. The fact that Mega-Venusaur is still quite strong is a testament to how good those two sets are. With Kyu-B gone, a rise for Mega-Venusaur was warranted.Ehh kinda a gimmick somewhat but I can see how this ranked up
Can’t we just leave Sawsbuck unranked like the 500 other pokemon we haven’t ranked? I don’t think Do Not Use should exist, personally. It’s pointless.I've tested scarf sawsbuck on ladder, from my experience, it is far worse than Jirachi or Togekiss. The decrease of power from an 80 bp Iron Head to a 70 BP Headbutt is significant enough to turn many neutral 3HKOs from Jirachi into neutral 4HKO's for Sawsbuck, giving your opponent another chance to break through, changing a 36% chance of winning for Jirachi (double flinch=.6*.6=.36) into a 22% chance of winning for Sawsbuck (.6*.6*.6), roughly the chance of a Gyarados waterfall flinch, which is obviously not impossible, but not something I would rely on to win consistently. Additionally, the typing change along with worse defenses is also significant. Sawsbuck has more weaknesses and less resistances, and it's mediocre 80/70/70 bulk means that if your opponent breaks through once, it's over. Part of the reason Jirachi was so broken and so used was because it's excellent Psychic/Steel typing combined with legendary 100/100/100 bulk made it so that if your opponent broke through once, the game wasn't over, you were more likely to live a given attack (assuming a neutral matchup, never send Jirachi to an unfavorable type matchup). Additionally, the steel typing of Iron Head let it do extremely well against fairies, and most importantly while Jirachi was legal, KyuB. Beating the best Pokemon in the meta and then some always makes you good. Sawsbuck does not even have a favorable matchup against Gyarados, the current best Pokemon. A non-megaed bulky Gyarados is 5HKOed after intimidate by Sawsbuck with Headbutt (which it has to use because it loses after Gyarados gets +2), which makes the chances of winning (getting 3 flinches) again a 22% chance at best (Gyarados needs to not get flinched twice in order to get two attacks off (unless you run bounce), unlike other powerful Pokemon that only need to get one powerful attack off, but are 4HKOed).
After around 30 games of using Sawsbuck, I believe I won once, maybe twice. Personal experience with a Pokemon does not equal viability, but a sample size of 30 is enough to indicate a pattern/trend (Thank you, AP Statistics). Sawsbuck is incredibly and infuriatingly bad, and ranking it anything other than Do Not Use would be lying to the community.
I Think Now that the word "Gimmick" Was not the right word, but i just think the sleep game is a problematic game that isnt going to be won. I was keeping that in mind. I Agree with everything you say Thank you for your contribution to the community. Have a nice day!The ban of Kyurem-Black, I would suggest, makes Whimsicott worse. One of the reasons to use Whimsicott over Jumpluff was its rather worry-free Kyurem-Black matchup. Only Sub Icium-Z and Max Special Attack invested sets were real difficulties. This makes the Kyu-b matchup far better for Whimsicott, especially at Team Preview. It never had to guess whether the Kyu-b was Scarf. In my opinion, Whimsicott is as viable as Jumpluff. I think it should never have been moved to C+, and a move to B- was overdue, similar to Carracosta’s drop.
I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here, friend. The way I’ve seen people use the word, a gimmick in 1v1 is a surprise set that only works as long as your opponent does not know what items/evs/moves you’re running, but is much less effective if they do. Mega-Venusaur’s two sets are widely known and easily prepared for. The fact that Mega-Venusaur is still quite strong is a testament to how good those two sets are. With Kyu-B gone, a rise for Mega-Venusaur was warranted.
Can’t we just leave Sawsbuck unranked like the 500 other pokemon we haven’t ranked? I don’t think Do Not Use should exist, personally. It’s pointless.
I always thought it existed as a way to dissuade people from noobtraps that seem like they could work in theoryCan’t we just leave Sawsbuck unranked like the 500 other pokemon we haven’t ranked? I don’t think Do Not Use should exist, personally. It’s pointless.