I think three-way finals might be the most universally hated, most complained about tournament aspect. Like, i don't think i need to explain what's wrong with those. So hey, if they are so bad, why not just get rid of them? I'm sure this has already been proposed at some point, but i think it's a worthwile idea to discuss..
Here's a round from a random tour with a 3*2^n bracket. Imagine it's round 1.
SoulWind vs twash
chub vs Raiza
egalvanc vs Kaz
Excal vs ABR
Serpi vs Unowndragon
Melbelle vs zf
So the simple obvious solution is to just give out byes until we hit a nice non-three-way-finals number. No ground-breaking revolutionary thoughts here. I'll remove two players to make the example a bit uglier.
SoulWind vs twash
chub vs Raiza
egalvanc vs Bye
Excal vs Bye
Serpi vs Bye
Melbelle vs Bye
zf vs Bye
Unowndragon vs Bye
Problem solved. The aesthetically pleasing way to do this is:
SoulWind vs (twash vs Raiza)
chub vs (Unowndragon vs zf)
egalvanc vs Melbelle
Excal vs Serpi
with a longer deadline. I imagine for semi-/unofficial tournaments that have 1 week long r1 this would be a two week deadline for the whole round, and one week deadline for "preliminary round" matches. I think this would suffice for officials as well, but idk, one+one week? two+one week?
Regarding point rewards in cups - win in "preliminary round" is one point, win in round 1 two points, getting a bye and losing afterwards is zero points.
The only downside i see with this is the need to decide the r1 deadline in officials, because these are already two weeks long for a reason. Otherwise - it's just the same one r1 game advantage / disadvantage that players just randomly get all the time with byes, activity wins etc - it's completely inconsequential AND also it will be there no matter what. Also players in some matches will get more time to schedule, but that feels like a pretty minor issue.
Here's a round from a random tour with a 3*2^n bracket. Imagine it's round 1.
SoulWind vs twash
chub vs Raiza
egalvanc vs Kaz
Excal vs ABR
Serpi vs Unowndragon
Melbelle vs zf
So the simple obvious solution is to just give out byes until we hit a nice non-three-way-finals number. No ground-breaking revolutionary thoughts here. I'll remove two players to make the example a bit uglier.
SoulWind vs twash
chub vs Raiza
egalvanc vs Bye
Excal vs Bye
Serpi vs Bye
Melbelle vs Bye
zf vs Bye
Unowndragon vs Bye
Problem solved. The aesthetically pleasing way to do this is:
SoulWind vs (twash vs Raiza)
chub vs (Unowndragon vs zf)
egalvanc vs Melbelle
Excal vs Serpi
with a longer deadline. I imagine for semi-/unofficial tournaments that have 1 week long r1 this would be a two week deadline for the whole round, and one week deadline for "preliminary round" matches. I think this would suffice for officials as well, but idk, one+one week? two+one week?
Regarding point rewards in cups - win in "preliminary round" is one point, win in round 1 two points, getting a bye and losing afterwards is zero points.
The only downside i see with this is the need to decide the r1 deadline in officials, because these are already two weeks long for a reason. Otherwise - it's just the same one r1 game advantage / disadvantage that players just randomly get all the time with byes, activity wins etc - it's completely inconsequential AND also it will be there no matter what. Also players in some matches will get more time to schedule, but that feels like a pretty minor issue.