i think that abortion should be illegal, because if pro-choice people have abortions, they won't pass on their genes, and the next generation will be flooded with pro-lifers.
...
i was hoping i would get to be the first to answer these, but then dm posted and i went to sleep. my answers are mostly the same as his (but trollier). oh well.
i tend to think that humanity is defined by consciousness. i think that any creature that can be thought of as self-aware is entitled to a lengthy set of rights and dignities. the challenge here is that consciousness is extremely difficult to define, understand, or recognize. i would be alright with killing people if they could be shown to have no consciousness, but that is currently not possible -- and i value every conscious person's life very highly. as such, i take a very safe route: if there's a chance that a creature might have achieved consciousness, then i'm strongly against killing it. that includes all people, as well as dolphins, whales, many apes, elephants, and several birds (including penguins). i think all of these groups have a right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness".
so now let's deal with this:
1. fetuses are obviously not conscious until a certain point in their development. many live babies don't even appear to be self-aware. however, that's not a safe assumption to make. i don't think any fetus could be conscious until at least the 3-4 month range, so that's where i think the cutoff should be. that gives women plenty of time to decide as well as guaranteeing that no thinking baby will be harmed.
2. what stops us from legalizing infanticide is the Big Government
3. but those are like exactly the same argument why would one be valid and the other not
4. my conscious tells me that not excercising is a bad thing but i do it anyway and nobody's rights are violated
5. you are dreadfully abusing the word 'imposed'. if i said you must get an abortion, that's imposing a rule. if i said you can't get an abortion, that's imposing a rule. but when i say that you can get one if you feel like it, that's not imposing anything (well, i suppose it's imposing a choice, but we tend to assume that's good).
6. sorry but this question is just too dumb to answer
7. when men start having babies, they'll get to choose whether or not to have an abortion. if your girlfriend doesn't want a child and you do, break up with her and find a better match.
8. women already have the choice to look at fetuses if they feel like it. why would you force people to look at something gross if they don't want to? this question is like something straight out of a clockwork orange
9. yes
10.
It is difficult to live without religion after having known it because it is difficult, after knowing religion, to take earth seriously. And unless one is a saint, it is difficult to live without taking earth seriously.
look, i've taken a quote about opium and substituted 'religion' for 'opium'. doesn't that bother you?
opium is the religion of the people.
ah! i've gone and done it again. does that bother you at all?
11. if i had been aborted before i was conscious, by definition i wouldn't have noticed. besides that, being in favour of giving women a choice doesn't mean i want them to choose abortion.
12. i'm pretty sure every one of these questions was built on the premise that fetuses are people, which i don't accept. as such, there's no way for me to answer this. (it doesn't help that there really isn't a question.)
13. it is discrimination. it discriminates against creatures that aren't people, which society already does en masse.
14. "Suppose we bracket for the moment the idea that the unborn child is a human being with human rights. Let's suppose that these things are uncertain, which in fact they are not." i should probably skip this question only for making this absurd statement, but anyway: there definitely is a degree of uncertainty. that's why i make the very generous estimate that fetuses become humans 5-6 months before birth.
15. the main reason that nobody wants to cut up kittens is because they're cute. fetuses aren't cute. i don't think the law should ban killing cats or dogs for food. to me, it's equivalent to hunting game.
16. damn this question is brilliant why doesn't all logic work this way it's like man i'm arguing so i'm right okay
17. why do you care who puts their hands into my vagina??? these questions are getting dumber
18. i would sort of like to see this happen, actually. if you're the sort of person who would abort a child for being gay, then there's like a 99% chance you're against abortions too. it would be a hysterical dilemna. anyway, since the fetus isn't a human, the mother can still do whatever she wants with it.
19. jaded indifference.
reading tayla's post and then her location made me laugh way harder than it should have
edit: holy cocks you are all posting so fast