viva la darmz
please :) all I really want is it to go back to where it was tbh; I still don't necessarily agree with some other parts but that ends up coming down to personal opinion.I could maybe see it returning to C+
Maybe I wasn't clear (certainly an possibility). Mega Latias being higher absolutely does affect Cresselia's viability. However, Cresselia's performance in battle isn't dependent on Mega Latias' existence. Its usage is, but not its performance (I guess technically they're sort of correlated but not nearly as much usage).Whether Cresselia moves up to C+ or stays in C, it won't change the way it performs when I use it.What? That has everything to do with how cresselia should be ranked. If it's never the best solution, it shouldn't even be ranked. It's why blissey, despite being effective, isn't ranked- any circumstance under which you'd want to use blissey, chansey is completely or mostly better.
That's the point I was making, at least: just because Mega Latias exists doesn't mean that Cresselia suddenly becomes bad in some (SOME) aspects, just outclassed.
Also quick side note: Cress is physically bulkier than Mega Latias so it's got that going for it too from a stats standpoint