Regrettably the service does not support Bison Bux, my currency of choice.
Let me check between the sofa cushions to see if I have any bitcoins lying around.
-
Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
Big Chaos Mafia 3 - well memed
- Thread starter Ampharos
- Start date
Regrettably the service does not support Bison Bux, my currency of choice.
Let me check between the sofa cushions to see if I have any bitcoins lying around.
Chaos theory is a branch of mathematics focused on the behavior of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions. 'Chaos' is an interdisciplinary theory stating that within the apparent randomness of chaotic complex systems, there are underlying patterns, constant feedback loops, repetition, self-similarity, fractals, self-organization, and reliance on programming at the initial point known as sensitive dependence on initial conditions. The butterfly effect describes how a small change in one state of a deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences in a later state, e.g. a butterfly flapping its wings in Brazil can cause a tornado in Texas.[1]
Small differences in initial conditions (such as those due to rounding errors in numerical computation) yield widely diverging outcomes for such dynamical systems — a response popularly referred to as the butterfly effect - rendering long-term prediction of their behavior impossible in general.[2][3] This happens even though these systems are deterministic, meaning that their future behavior is fully determined by their initial conditions, with no random elements involved.[4] In other words, the deterministic nature of these systems does not make them predictable.[5][6] This behavior is known as deterministic chaos, or simply chaos. The theory was summarized by Edward Lorenz as:[7]
Chaos: When the present determines the future, but the approximate present does not approximately determine the future.
Chaotic behavior exists in many natural systems, such as weather and climate.[8][9] It also occurs spontaneously in some systems with artificial components, such as road traffic.[10] This behavior can be studied through analysis of a chaotic mathematical model, or through analytical techniques such as recurrence plots and Poincaré maps. Chaos theory has applications in several disciplines, including meteorology, sociology, physics,[11] environmental science, computer science, engineering, economics, biology, ecology, and philosophy. The theory formed the basis for such fields of study as complex dynamical systems, edge of chaos theory, self-assembly process.
Results going out. It is now Day 1. Day 1 ends 4/6 at 2 AM CDT.
Small differences in initial conditions (such as those due to rounding errors in numerical computation) yield widely diverging outcomes for such dynamical systems — a response popularly referred to as the butterfly effect - rendering long-term prediction of their behavior impossible in general.[2][3] This happens even though these systems are deterministic, meaning that their future behavior is fully determined by their initial conditions, with no random elements involved.[4] In other words, the deterministic nature of these systems does not make them predictable.[5][6] This behavior is known as deterministic chaos, or simply chaos. The theory was summarized by Edward Lorenz as:[7]
Chaos: When the present determines the future, but the approximate present does not approximately determine the future.
Chaotic behavior exists in many natural systems, such as weather and climate.[8][9] It also occurs spontaneously in some systems with artificial components, such as road traffic.[10] This behavior can be studied through analysis of a chaotic mathematical model, or through analytical techniques such as recurrence plots and Poincaré maps. Chaos theory has applications in several disciplines, including meteorology, sociology, physics,[11] environmental science, computer science, engineering, economics, biology, ecology, and philosophy. The theory formed the basis for such fields of study as complex dynamical systems, edge of chaos theory, self-assembly process.
Results going out. It is now Day 1. Day 1 ends 4/6 at 2 AM CDT.
FeelsManGood
I died but I got to come back as a skeleton so that's pretty cool.
oh lul it was n0
Ghosts are pretty spooky if you ask me.
pls don't hurt
lawl chainspam
If anyone took me up on checking out my role, I expect a pm
Pls no
We are lynching twin today, the mafia role doubler/hooker/bg/killer
Lynch thetwinmasters
Lynch thetwinmasters
Lynch Vonfiedler
Really interesting that a person known for being a notorious liar suddenly claims that I'm mafia even though he claims an extremely suspicious role that can't be proven at all.
Can confirm my action failed on vonfiedler, can't confirm whether that's his role or whether he's mafia though
This is an awfully big trust fall for Von to make. If any detail of his claim against Twin is off the mark, the flip would put Von's neck in the noose. I'd say my paranoia was stirring, but there's a major discrepancy here.
vonFiedler Are you already walking this back?
vonFiedler Are you already walking this back?
Nobody ever votes unless someone else bolds a vote first. Just cause it doesn't count doesn't mean it's useless
My complaint about GySgt. Twin Thee Masters
I am writing to express my concerns about GySgt. Twin Thee Masters and, more specifically, his mind games regarding profligate clodpates. Let's review the errors in Twin's statements in order. First, Twin's rambunctious animadversions are my biggest pet peeve. As a consistently mortified observer of his scribblings, I can't help but want to give the needy a helping hand as opposed to an elbow in the face. If he were as bright as he thinks he is, he'd know that he has warned us that one day, snooty leeches will infiltrate the media with the express purpose of disseminating disaffected information. If you think about it, you'll realize that his warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that if history follows its course, it should be evident that the time has come to choose between freedom or slavery, revolt or submission, and liberty or Twin's particularly fastidious form of paternalism. It's clear what Twin wants us to choose, but one could truthfully say that he turns his back on our most heartfelt pleas for mercy. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that the television-addicted, drone inhabitants of his rotting empire of pharisaism uniformly believe that snotty wastrels should be given absolute authority to fuel the fires of hatred. Well, I have news for such rebarbative, argumentative wimps: If you study Twin's hectoring holier-than-thou attitudes long enough, you'll come to the inescapable conclusion that if we don't soon tell him to stop what he's doing, he will proceed with his adversarial circulars, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given him our permission to do so.
I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that you should never forget the three most important facets of Twin's précis, namely their prissy origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature. A good friend of mine once said that we should all commit to practices that build community and eliminate behaviors that work against what we are dedicated to building. Amen to that! In fact, I even informed my friend that Twin believes that inerudite anthropophagi are easily housebroken. Well, I beg to differ.
Twin has produced a large number of larcenous hypnopompic insights. I'm sorry that I can't give each of these the angry retort that it deserves, but I can say that Twin's wisecracks will have consequences—very serious consequences. We ought to begin doing something about that. We ought to name and shame Twin's cringers for their demented acts of fetishism. We ought to spread the word that I have frequently criticized his unspoken plan to concentrate all the wealth of the world into his own hands. He usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of savagism, immoralism, child molestation, and halitosis. Twin hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that Twin garners attention for his imperious pranks by grabbing the teats of Leninism and milking them for all they're worth. Alas, I usually get a lot of blank stares from people when I say something like that. What I mean is that any benefit that happens to be gained from Twin's treasonous, crotchety opinions is bound to be fugacious. This issue is coming to the fore because Twin isn't interested in debates or open forums. He just wants to shut up dissenters. That's why Twin's criticisms are lethargic by any measure. Given that they're intended to weave Twin's disgusting traits, ruthless perversions, and temulent manuscripts into a rich tapestry that is sure to destroy all tradition, all morality, and the entire democratic system, they come close to being a crime.
Not to belabor the point, but Twin likes to imply that education should teach the precepts of revanchism and the duties of man towards insidious gossipmongers. This is what his claims amount to, although, of course, they're daubed over with the viscid slobber of disagreeable drivel devised by his flacks and mindlessly multiplied by the worst classes of gutless, froward drug addicts I've ever seen. Naturally, I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to rouse people's indignation at Twin. Of course, totalitarianism is a plague upon us all, a pox that will likely not be erased in the lifetime of any reader of this letter. To Twin, however, it's merely a convenient mechanism for utilizing unfathomable brutality against his castigators. Only Twin could possibly allege that he is a voice of probity. This applies first and foremost to a faction under whose benighted brand of solipsism the whole of honest humanity is suffering: Twin's army of dissolute tax cheats.
Interestingly, a number of my friends advised me against penning a letter that is so blatantly critical of Twin. I had to tell my friends that I will stay in jail to the end of my days before I make a butchery of my conscience. After hearing my side of the story, my friends agreed that Twin is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, his willingness to support hostile governments known for human-rights abuses, wrongful imprisonment, and slavery sets a new record for brazenness. It undoubtedly shouldn't be necessary to have to say such things, but nutty bullies are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the “poeta nascitur, non fit” that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that Twin justifies his muzzy-headed agendas with fallacious logical arguments based on argumentum ad baculum. In case you're unfamiliar with the term, it means that if we don't accept Twin's claim that anyone who disagrees with him is a potential terrorist then he will form the association in the public's mind between any hastily mounted campaigns he disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that under the guise of “fighting ableism,” GySgt. Twin Thee Masters will impose a “glass ceiling” that limits our opportunities for promotions in most jobs.
I am writing to express my concerns about GySgt. Twin Thee Masters and, more specifically, his mind games regarding profligate clodpates. Let's review the errors in Twin's statements in order. First, Twin's rambunctious animadversions are my biggest pet peeve. As a consistently mortified observer of his scribblings, I can't help but want to give the needy a helping hand as opposed to an elbow in the face. If he were as bright as he thinks he is, he'd know that he has warned us that one day, snooty leeches will infiltrate the media with the express purpose of disseminating disaffected information. If you think about it, you'll realize that his warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that if history follows its course, it should be evident that the time has come to choose between freedom or slavery, revolt or submission, and liberty or Twin's particularly fastidious form of paternalism. It's clear what Twin wants us to choose, but one could truthfully say that he turns his back on our most heartfelt pleas for mercy. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that the television-addicted, drone inhabitants of his rotting empire of pharisaism uniformly believe that snotty wastrels should be given absolute authority to fuel the fires of hatred. Well, I have news for such rebarbative, argumentative wimps: If you study Twin's hectoring holier-than-thou attitudes long enough, you'll come to the inescapable conclusion that if we don't soon tell him to stop what he's doing, he will proceed with his adversarial circulars, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given him our permission to do so.
I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that you should never forget the three most important facets of Twin's précis, namely their prissy origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature. A good friend of mine once said that we should all commit to practices that build community and eliminate behaviors that work against what we are dedicated to building. Amen to that! In fact, I even informed my friend that Twin believes that inerudite anthropophagi are easily housebroken. Well, I beg to differ.
Twin has produced a large number of larcenous hypnopompic insights. I'm sorry that I can't give each of these the angry retort that it deserves, but I can say that Twin's wisecracks will have consequences—very serious consequences. We ought to begin doing something about that. We ought to name and shame Twin's cringers for their demented acts of fetishism. We ought to spread the word that I have frequently criticized his unspoken plan to concentrate all the wealth of the world into his own hands. He usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of savagism, immoralism, child molestation, and halitosis. Twin hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that Twin garners attention for his imperious pranks by grabbing the teats of Leninism and milking them for all they're worth. Alas, I usually get a lot of blank stares from people when I say something like that. What I mean is that any benefit that happens to be gained from Twin's treasonous, crotchety opinions is bound to be fugacious. This issue is coming to the fore because Twin isn't interested in debates or open forums. He just wants to shut up dissenters. That's why Twin's criticisms are lethargic by any measure. Given that they're intended to weave Twin's disgusting traits, ruthless perversions, and temulent manuscripts into a rich tapestry that is sure to destroy all tradition, all morality, and the entire democratic system, they come close to being a crime.
Not to belabor the point, but Twin likes to imply that education should teach the precepts of revanchism and the duties of man towards insidious gossipmongers. This is what his claims amount to, although, of course, they're daubed over with the viscid slobber of disagreeable drivel devised by his flacks and mindlessly multiplied by the worst classes of gutless, froward drug addicts I've ever seen. Naturally, I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to rouse people's indignation at Twin. Of course, totalitarianism is a plague upon us all, a pox that will likely not be erased in the lifetime of any reader of this letter. To Twin, however, it's merely a convenient mechanism for utilizing unfathomable brutality against his castigators. Only Twin could possibly allege that he is a voice of probity. This applies first and foremost to a faction under whose benighted brand of solipsism the whole of honest humanity is suffering: Twin's army of dissolute tax cheats.
Interestingly, a number of my friends advised me against penning a letter that is so blatantly critical of Twin. I had to tell my friends that I will stay in jail to the end of my days before I make a butchery of my conscience. After hearing my side of the story, my friends agreed that Twin is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, his willingness to support hostile governments known for human-rights abuses, wrongful imprisonment, and slavery sets a new record for brazenness. It undoubtedly shouldn't be necessary to have to say such things, but nutty bullies are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the “poeta nascitur, non fit” that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that Twin justifies his muzzy-headed agendas with fallacious logical arguments based on argumentum ad baculum. In case you're unfamiliar with the term, it means that if we don't accept Twin's claim that anyone who disagrees with him is a potential terrorist then he will form the association in the public's mind between any hastily mounted campaigns he disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that under the guise of “fighting ableism,” GySgt. Twin Thee Masters will impose a “glass ceiling” that limits our opportunities for promotions in most jobs.