Since other people are probably curious.
<Eagle4> yo what was the reasoning behind the king/kirsche mislynches
<Eagle4> worth a try
<elcheeso> king was because the guy was 100% useless outside of mentioning the phylactery (and he didnt even give the full deets on empoof), gave basically zero info all game and even though it was a ml i have zero regrets about it, kirsche was just a lot of assumptions with the mafia having an og and what their safe claim would be (amongst other minor things i cant remember at this point) given how the protects and shit had played out
Also according to the sheet, Yeti was cleaned n1 by the twins, Walrein n2, Aubisio n3, so it's entirely possible that both AG and Walrein were given false roles along with Aubisio. But yeah, I kind of feel like Walrein would have lynched less mafia if he was moling, and probably most importantly... I think I was the final say on who we were lynching with king and kirsche. I mostly ignored AG in those discussions because his role was just super weird and didn't make sense to me as a safe claim and was a bit weird for mafia to have. But of course, I kinda forgot about Paperblade's role so... yeah. This is why you don't let a noob make important decisions!
That said, I did tell Walrein to put internet on Mithril the night he died, but he ignored my sage wisdom and went for GME because he was the important twin >:(