Yo Yo : )
Just thinking about players;
And again, a lot of this assumes hitmonleet scum, which is highly probable (but tiny tiny bit skeptical {but hitmonleet not responding is a good sign?!})
acidphoenix;
unvote
vote pancake
what rvs does is make it so eventually people talk about anything useful
you know what randvotes do smh
I really liked this post, and if not for aura I would have voted pancake for similar reasons. So that gave me some town vibes.
no ag, he does have a case vs you, and that case is one of very few things i don't actually have a problem with his logic on
Still thinking about this one
Josh; the bad post you linked seems more scum motivated if they know that aura is town because they're adding the caveat of could be dumbness so you're an anchor point where blame can fall if aura flips town. I get that acid could be lazy scum, but I can imagine more conviction in a bus of your scum partner at that point than just "yeah sounds right, but maybe dumb".
MoodyCloud;
As I referenced yesterday, this is such a weird post;
Blank slate I am very tempted to vote you so I'd like you to explain why you're voting on hitmonleet atm
I don't think there's a precedent for him to ask about a vote like that.
But with Moody I see that the *plan* of watcher / disguise artist target is obviously a very ludicrous suggestion for mafia. I guess the question is did they really believe that both watcher and disguise artist would target them after suggesting it?
His scumreads on Knights and Asek for not posting as much were bad, but I think I can see them as misapplications of meta?
Pancake;
I do want this flip but I still feel as though moodycloud is a better lynch than Aura Guardian. I highly suggest we get on him instead, and if you guys don't listen, whatever, that's fine, we'll play it on whether or not Aura is scum, this is a good flip to have anyway.
This is the other post I mentioned yesterday and it's pretty potent. "I want this flip" - which indicates that they still want to lynch aura, allegedly. Wanting that flip but "highly suggest[-ing] we get on him [MoodyCloud] instead" seems a bit bollocks. It seems like trying to eke some towncred and stay cool if aura flips scum, whilst presenting a laid back suggestion to go for some one who isn't aura.
The Moody read seems to develop and yes there's the idea of too scummy to be scum but regardless it's a really bad request to move the lynch but affirm the lynch you're advocating to move on from.
Mithril;
Didn't commenting on the aura guardian wagon or aura guardian, except for their RVS post (which I thought was unnecessary, but I can see town also wanting to just post 'something' there).
All that being said though, I'm going to vote asek for now. He has two posts, and all he really talked about was being against claiming and thought Twin was town just because they agreed on claiming. Some actual thoughts on players would be nice.
Again, didn't like that they didn't vote Josh, and then voted Asek for set-up speculation and lack of evaluative stances "actual thoughts on players". Particularly because a) they found Josh suspicious and talked about that in the post and b) Mithril themselves didn't really have much non claiming discussion outside of the Josh and hitmonleet link.
King_;
I thought Knights aggression was a bit out of place, but not much. Ah, gotta go soon, so I will do more later with King_, but first comment is that they don't seem to be digging that deep.
Concise conclusions
Basically don't really think it's acid.
Want to read King_ and re-read Moody (and also asek, Josh, Haruno, but I'm not particularly keen on voting them at all).
I want to believe that mafia wouldn't play Moody's game and that Moody has made mistakes as town rather than intentional scum.
So I think it's most likely Pancake, or then Mithril (and have to re-read King_).
Questions;
acidphoenix; read on asek and King_, and I want to see your Moody look-in?
pancake; why do you like Haruno's contribution?
King_; how have acid and Moody been off?
Haruno; thoughts on pancake & mithril 'cases'?
Bye for now : )